On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 16:46, mb wrote:
> At 17:54 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
>
> >I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
> >someone told be I should reformat my partition in Reiserfs rather that
> >ext3 and I will get a great perlformance improvement
>
> ..unti
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Oliver Jones wrote:
> Speaking of FS corruption. In the past I've had corruption occur with
> Reiser FS for no readily apparent reason. I've never had the same thing
> happen with ext2. And until recently I've never had it happen with
> ext3. Recently though I did have a w
Speaking of FS corruption. In the past I've had corruption occur with Reiser FS for no readily apparent reason. I've never had the same thing happen with ext2. And until recently I've never had it happen with ext3. Recently though I did have a workstation corrupt it's ext3 /usr/bin director
For what it's worth, I spoke with an employee of Sendmail, Inc. about
eighteen months ago. At the time, for their MUA they were using an old
1.x.something version of Cyrus-imapd that they had been patching and
maintaining for some time, but of course it uses a very similar storage
format to cur
Craig Ringer wrote:
Some people swear by XFS - and it /does/ work brilliantly with
LVM - but there have been reports of unreliability and FS corruption.
Could you please provide some links to these reports? Thanks.
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:15:16 -0800
David R Bosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW:
>
> We've been running our ~1200 user server on reiserfs/RedHat for 2 years or
> so now with no filesystem problems. In fact everyone I know that uses
> linux for any purpose uses reiser as their standard fs.
mb wrote:
PS I know some people say XFS, JFS etc are brilliant but my local
experience is that although they may be faster in Linux 2.4, they are more
prone to corruption.. (haven't tried either in the last 6 months tho')
As for XFS, I never had any problems with it (Version 1.2.0). We are
runni
FWIW:
We've been running our ~1200 user server on reiserfs/RedHat for 2 years or
so now with no filesystem problems. In fact everyone I know that uses
linux for any purpose uses reiser as their standard fs. It's been fast and
reliable for us.
We'll be migrating to a new box running 2.2.2 on
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:46:04PM +, mb wrote:
> At 17:54 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
>
> >I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
> >someone told be I should reformat my partition in Reiserfs rather that
> >ext3 and I will get a great perlformance improvemen
At 17:54 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
>I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
>someone told be I should reformat my partition in Reiserfs rather that
>ext3 and I will get a great perlformance improvement
..until you get a hardware failure and your entire mail sto
We have been using JFS, which has worked quite well for us. This is on a
Dell 2650 running Redhat 9.
Bennett Crowell
--On Friday, January 9, 2004 22:46 +0800 Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
s
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
someone told be I should reformat my partition in Reiserfs rather that
ext3 and I will get a great perlformance improvement
I noticed a significant performance improvement when moving from ext3 to
reise
Hello all,
I am having around 2000 users on my cyrus server ( redhat 9.0 )
someone told be I should reformat my partition in Reiserfs rather that ext3 and I will get a great perlformance improvement
Is that so
Thanks
Ram
13 matches
Mail list logo
