Re: Need some advice

2003-07-21 Thread John C. Amodeo
Ken, Are you going to continue to use virtual IP addresses? Yes. This is the plan. As the documentation suggests, this is the only way to connect users to the correct mailbox without having to modify client side login names... Cyrus strips the first part of the FQDN as the local name and

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-21 Thread Ken Murchison
John C. Amodeo wrote: I do have another question on the same topic... How can you ensure mail is delivered correctly (via LMTP) if the actual e-mail address is different than the domain Cyrus uses? For instance: email.dep1.rutgers.edu (Cyrus server IP) dep1.rutgers.edu (Cyrus domain) But the

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-21 Thread John C. Amodeo
Ken, The envelope recipient given to lmtpd (RCPT TO) has to have the correct domain, otherwise lmtpd won't find the mailbox path. If you can't That seems logical... Just out of curiosity, why wasn't the LMTP daemon designed to support virtual domains in the same fashion the Cyrus IMAP server

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-21 Thread Ken Murchison
John C. Amodeo wrote: Ken, The envelope recipient given to lmtpd (RCPT TO) has to have the correct domain, otherwise lmtpd won't find the mailbox path. If you can't That seems logical... Just out of curiosity, why wasn't the LMTP daemon designed to support virtual domains in the same

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-19 Thread Ken Murchison
John C. Amodeo wrote: Another issue that's come up is that of the actual virtual domain design. In reality, we have 1 domain, but several sub domains within that domain that make up the different IMAP e-mail servers. The Cyrus documentation suggests that you can have: mail.example.net

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-18 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, John C. Amodeo wrote: I am looking for some sound advice for the following situation I'm currently faced with, and I was hoping someone has some good advice to give me... I'll let Ken answer the virtual domain parts, but I'll try to point you in the right direction on

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-18 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, John C. Amodeo wrote: I was thinking of using the Murder, but from what I read, you need Cyrus = 2.1.3 on *all* servers, which would mean I would need to upgrade the old systems first, which, in itself, is the reason we are migrating to a new system... Well, yes, But

Re: Need some advice

2003-07-18 Thread John C. Amodeo
Rob, I was thinking of using the Murder, but from what I read, you need Cyrus = 2.1.3 on *all* servers, which would mean I would need to upgrade the old systems first, which, in itself, is the reason we are migrating to a new system... -John Rob Siemborski wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, John C.

Cyrus 2.0.16, lmtp, procmail - So far so good, but I need some advice.

2001-09-16 Thread Louis LeBlanc
Hey all. I have been following a bit of the 'Signalled to death by 11' issue a while back, and near as I can tell, it seems to have been solved in the latest (2.0.16) release. I have 2.0.16 installed on FreeBSD 4.3-release, and I would still like to use procmail for filtering. I know about

Re: Cyrus 2.0.16, lmtp, procmail - So far so good, but I need some advice.

2001-09-16 Thread Werner Reisberger
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:01:13PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: With 1.6.24, I simply changed the Cyrus mailer args so that sendmail would dump the message to procmail, which would then pipe the filtered message thru to deliver. I notice deliver is still there, but it doesn't seem to be used

Re: Cyrus 2.0.16, lmtp, procmail - So far so good, but I need some advice.

2001-09-16 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 09/16/01 08:26 PM, Werner Reisberger sat at the `puter and typed: On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:01:13PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: With 1.6.24, I simply changed the Cyrus mailer args so that sendmail would dump the message to procmail, which would then pipe the filtered message thru to