Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-25 Thread Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus
imapd_userisadmin, > imapd_userid, > imapd_authstate, > NULL, NULL, 0) == 0) > ? "[TRYCREATE] " : "", error_message(r)); &g

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus
NULL, NULL, 0) == 0) ? "[TRYCREATE] " : "", error_message(r)); } else if (copyuid) { prot_printf(imapd_out, "%s OK [COPYUID %s] %s\r\n", tag, copyuid, e

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus
ion - so I don't really know how to even recreate the problem. The semantics of the OK response *should* be "Message is safely written on disk (so you can delete the original message)", shouldn't it? --Janne On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:56:15AM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > When y

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus
t; > > > > > --Janne > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:27:40PM +1000, Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus > > wrote: > > > Version? > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, at 21:47, Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > > > Hi! >

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus
27;s srpm. Revision 6 of said rpm. > > > --Janne > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:27:40PM +1000, Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus wrote: > > Version? > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, at 21:47, Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > &g

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus
2, 2016, at 21:47, Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I've always thought that IMAP COPY should only say OK once the message file > > is > > safely on the disk. So that it should block, should another imapd process be > > holding a write lo

Re: Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Bron Gondwana via Info-cyrus
Version? On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, at 21:47, Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus wrote: > Hi! > > I've always thought that IMAP COPY should only say OK once the message file is > safely on the disk. So that it should block, should another imapd process be > holding a write lock to

Shared folder, COPY, OK, message nowhere to be seen

2016-04-22 Thread Janne Peltonen via Info-cyrus
Hi! I've always thought that IMAP COPY should only say OK once the message file is safely on the disk. So that it should block, should another imapd process be holding a write lock to the folder. Now today I experienced something very weird. There was a shared folder. If I tried to c

Re: Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread John
On 01/02/13 16:42, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > A modseq is very much like an etag or a ctag in HTTP/WebDAV. It is a > value that gets incremented with every change. So the the modseq on the > slave is greater than the modseq on the master... something is out of > sync. I guessed that's what it

Re: Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 16:15 +, John wrote: > Further to my last message, I've updated my master so now both servers > report the same version: > version: v2.4.17 d1df8aff 2012-12-01 > I'd like to understand some error messages that I am getting and what I > should do to resolve them... >

Re: Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread John
Further to my last message, I've updated my master so now both servers report the same version: version: v2.4.17 d1df8aff 2012-12-01 I'd like to understand some error messages that I am getting and what I should do to resolve them... On the replica: syncserver[8816]: higher last_uid on re

Re: Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread John
lhost sync_client[239]: seen_db: user john opened /srv/mail/cyrus/user/j/john.seen Any thoughts? >> I'd like to confirm that the replication mechanism implemented with >> sync_server and sync_client is ok for this kind of set-up. It certainly >> appears to work just fine

Re: Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
I'd like to confirm that the replication mechanism implemented with > sync_server and sync_client is ok for this kind of set-up. It certainly > appears to work just fine like this but I haven't found anything in the > documentation saying that two-way replication like this is ok (

Is it OK for users to use either of a pair of replicated servers ?

2013-02-01 Thread John
the two servers in sync. It's a basic configuration intended for use by a small number of people. I'd like to confirm that the replication mechanism implemented with sync_server and sync_client is ok for this kind of set-up. It certainly appears to work just fine like this but I hav

Re: Bounced email although LMTP returns an ok

2006-09-30 Thread Andreas Winkelmann
Am Wednesday 27 September 2006 14:40 schrieb Hardi Gunawan: > It seems I've many problems with Cyrus on SuSE SLES10. > > My current problem is that there are many bounces on > the server, but the LMTP returns an "ok". Here's the > log on the server: > >

Bounced email although LMTP returns an ok

2006-09-27 Thread Hardi Gunawan
Hi, It seems I've many problems with Cyrus on SuSE SLES10. My current problem is that there are many bounces on the server, but the LMTP returns an "ok". Here's the log on the server: Sep 26 20:12:29 mail2 postfix/lmtp[14840]: > /var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp[/var/lib/imap

Re: S: C01 OK Unknown Error Code: -1904809418

2006-07-24 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
--On Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:14:58 AM +1000 James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Imtest is giving me the following error: S: C01 OK Unknown Error Code: -1904809418 This is IMAP_OK_COMPLETED, which should expand to "Completed" My suspicion is that your imapd somehow got li

S: C01 OK Unknown Error Code: -1904809418

2006-07-24 Thread James Brown
Imtest is giving me the following error: S: C01 OK Unknown Error Code: -1904809418 Anyone know what this means? Thanks, James. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List

Re: Authentication ok but heaps of lines in log file

2005-10-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Pascal Mouret wrote: Hello all, I've got a problem (amongst others) with my log files being clogged with messages like these, most likely to be caused by cyrus-sasl : Oct 24 17:13:47 mailup pop3[254947]: could not find auxprop plugin, was searching for '[all]' and that at a rate of about 5 ev

Authentication ok but heaps of lines in log file

2005-10-26 Thread Pascal Mouret
Hello all, I've got a problem (amongst others) with my log files being clogged with messages like these, most likely to be caused by cyrus-sasl : Oct 24 17:13:47 mailup pop3[254947]: could not find auxprop plugin, was searching for '[all]' and that at a rate of about 5 every second Still, auth

Re: help pls? imtest OK for localhost, fails for same box @ IP .... where to start looking?

2005-10-07 Thread OpenMacNews
sasl is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which I > have in my user database, so I can log in. i've been googling the lists abt realms. let's just say their use/implementation is *not* very clear to me :-/ AND, apparently, quite a few others have issues/questions as well ... >> >>ok. mine i

Re: help pls? imtest OK for localhost, fails for same box @ IP .... where to start looking?

2005-10-07 Thread Georg Gell
== yes > > >>>watching the debug log, it looks like this: > > >>>imtest localhost: ok, I meant imtest -a username localhost >>>login with [EMAIL PROTECTED] this is the part I was talking about. If you have virtdomains: yes, imapd adds a realm to all us

Re: help pls? imtest OK for localhost, fails for same box @ IP .... where to start looking?

2005-10-07 Thread OpenMacNews
g log, it looks like this: > imtest localhost: > login with [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok. mine is: imtest -t "" -p imap -m plain -a my.admin -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 login: localhost [127.0.0.1] testuser PLAIN+TLS > imtest servername.domain.com: > login with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: help pls? imtest OK for localhost, fails for same box @ IP .... where to start looking?

2005-10-07 Thread Georg Gell
OpenMacNews schrieb: > hi all, > > testing my cyrus imap v 2.2.12 + sasl v 2.1.22, with: > > % imtest -t "" -p imap -m plain -a my.admin -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 127.0.0.1 > > i CAN login successfully > > log: --> > Oct 6 22:24:24 devbox DMCYRUS/imaplocal[2012]: login: localhost

help pls? imtest OK for localhost, fails for same box @ IP .... where to start looking?

2005-10-06 Thread OpenMacNews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, testing my cyrus imap v 2.2.12 + sasl v 2.1.22, with: % imtest -t "" -p imap -m plain -a my.admin -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 i CAN login successfully log: --> Oct 6 22:24:24 devbox DMCYRUS/imaplocal[2012]: login: local

Cyrus-IMAPd-cvs OK on OSX 10.4.1 w/ --disable-sieve; "Bus Error" w/ --enable-sieve

2005-06-20 Thread OpenMacNews
hi, bldg unpatched Cyrus-IMAPd-cvs (6/20/05 01:00:00) w/ Cyrus-SASL v2.1.22 on OSX 10.4.1 if configured w/: ... --disable-sieve ... install is successful: % otool -L /usr/local/cyrus-imap/libexec/imapd /usr/local/cyrus-imap/libexec/imapd: /usr/local/cyrus-sasl

LOGIN & PLAIN auth OK; CRAM-MD5 & DIGEST-MD5 fail w/ "no mechanism available: security flags do not match required"

2004-11-02 Thread OpenMacNews
LOGIN -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] -p imap testserver.testdomain.com S: C01 OK Completed Please enter your password: C: L01 LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] {6} S: + go ahead C: S: L01 OK

POP3 timeout, IMAP OK

2004-05-26 Thread Bagt
Hello, I have Redhat Enterprise AS 3.0 ( update 2 not installed ) and Cyrus-imap 2.2.3-8 ( from RPM Simon Matter ) + SASL + PAM + OpenLDAP Yesterday for the first time I have problem with POP3 server. > telnet localhost 110 +OK Cyrus POP3 v2.2.3 server ready u

Ok to kill single imapd processes?

2004-04-13 Thread Kevin M. Myer
Hello, We are running an installation of Cyrus IMAPd. There is one particular imapd process hanging around that has been terminated on the other end (i.e. laptop is no longer there, device in between doing NAT has been rebooted and our firewall shows no connection). However, the mail server stil

Cyrus don't sends a OK after QUIT

2003-09-11 Thread Atlantis Online
Hi Does someone has a solution or the reason for the following problem: When I pop with MS Outlook Express on my Cyrus IMAP/POP3-Account, and there are NO new mails, then everything is fine: - from the outlook pop3.log protocolfile - POP3: 15:55:07 [rx] +OK ..xx Cyrus POP3

Cyrus don't sends a OK after QUIT

2003-09-11 Thread Atlantis Online
Hi Does someone has a solution or the reason for the following problem: When I pop with MS Outlook Express on my Cyrus IMAP/POP3-Account, and there are NO new mails, then everything is fine: - from the outlook pop3.log protocolfile - POP3: 15:55:07 [rx] +OK ..xx Cyrus POP3

Re: Ok -- I got a few problems ironed out.

2003-06-19 Thread Robert Urban
You wrote: > any idea what I need to do? also does anyone have something I can toss = > into a perl script to auto create mailboxes for users that have 15mb = > quotas? see: http://www.unix-wissen.de/add-cyrus-user for a (very) simple example of a script for adding cyrus users. cheers,

Re: Ok -- I got a few problems ironed out.

2003-06-19 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Drew Weaver wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cyradm localhost > IMAP Password: > > localhost.localdomain> cm aweaver > createmailbox: System I/O error You probably mean user.aweaver (or user/aweaver) > Jun 19 13:09:46 localhost imapd[1165]: IOERROR: creating directory > /var

Ok -- I got a few problems ironed out.

2003-06-19 Thread Drew Weaver
So, now that I know I need to create the mailboxes myself (why i'll never understand) i'm using cyradm to do so and..   [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cyradm localhostIMAP Password:   localhost.localdomain> cm aweavercreatemailbox: System I/O errorlocalhost.localdomain>   this is in my /var/log/i

Re: Verifying if everything is ok after upgrading to db-4.1.25 ?

2003-03-29 Thread Shinichiro HIDA
Hi, > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > I just upgraded my 2.2-cvs installation from berkeley db-3.2 to db-4.1. > The new system now seems to work properly. I had to do some things for > which I would like to know if they may cause f

Verifying if everything is ok after upgrading to db-4.1.25 ?

2003-03-27 Thread Christian Schulte
Hello all, I just upgraded my 2.2-cvs installation from berkeley db-3.2 to db-4.1. The new system now seems to work properly. I had to do some things for which I would like to know if they may cause future trouble. First of all I would need to know what these directories are used for exactly:

Re: Cyrus-IMAPd+SASL+PAM not communicating (but testsaslauthd says OK)

2003-01-16 Thread Ken Murchison
Thomas Hannan wrote: > > Hi all, > > The cliffnotes version of my problem is that even though I run > /usr/local/sbin/saslauthd -a pam& > and my /etc/imapd.conf contains "sasl_pwcheck_method: pam" This should be "sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd" -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Sof

Cyrus-IMAPd+SASL+PAM not communicating (but testsaslauthd says OK)

2003-01-16 Thread Thomas Hannan
Hi all, The cliffnotes version of my problem is that even though I run /usr/local/sbin/saslauthd -a pam& and my /etc/imapd.conf contains "sasl_pwcheck_method: pam" I get an auth failed when trying to login over IMAP or imtest: $ testsaslauthd -u tico2 -p test1234 -s imap

Re: 2.2cvs, imapd OK, pop3d hangs before sending banner to clients

2003-01-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Jonathan Marsden wrote: > > Attaching to one 'connected to but hung' pop3d with gdb shows a > backtrace of: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x420dadf4 in read () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 > #1 0x4002a480 in __DTOR_END__ () from /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 > #2 0x40024186 in randinit () from /usr

Re: 2.2cvs, imapd OK, pop3d hangs before sending banner to clients

2003-01-10 Thread Patrick Boutilier
You might be running out of enthropy. cat /dev/random to check. Jonathan Marsden wrote: On one of our (Red Hat 7.3, dual PIII CPU) servers running cyrus-imapd (2.2 CVS as of late September 2002), last night POP3 and POP3S access mysteriously "stopped working". IMAP and IMAPS access are still

Re: 2.2cvs, imapd OK, pop3d hangs before sending banner to clients

2003-01-10 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > Attaching to one 'connected to but hung' pop3d with gdb shows a > backtrace of: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x420dadf4 in read () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 > #1 0x4002a480 in __DTOR_END__ () from /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 > #2 0x40024186 in randi

2.2cvs, imapd OK, pop3d hangs before sending banner to clients

2003-01-10 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On one of our (Red Hat 7.3, dual PIII CPU) servers running cyrus-imapd (2.2 CVS as of late September 2002), last night POP3 and POP3S access mysteriously "stopped working". IMAP and IMAPS access are still fine. Looking at the logs shows things like: Jan 10 02:11:16 aerogram pop3s[17907]: DBERROR

Ok....

2002-04-14 Thread Scott M Likens
This is irratating every time i reboot, and i do mean EVERY time, my sasldb2 gets corrupted and i have to re-enter every single users login and password. Now i must admit that is quite disturbing, and annoying I have ended up writing a simple script using -p to set all the passwords. Is this

Re: No NFS? Ok, how about GFS/GPFS

2001-11-08 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:20:18 -0800, > Neil Bortnak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nb) writes: nb> I'm not planning on implementing this but could you run a single tier nb> cluster of IMAP servers which share the same read-write storage on a SAN nb> using GFS or GPFS as a shared filesystem? Can th

No NFS? Ok, how about GFS/GPFS

2001-11-08 Thread Neil Bortnak
Hi all, I'm not planning on implementing this but could you run a single tier cluster of IMAP servers which share the same read-write storage on a SAN using GFS or GPFS as a shared filesystem? Can this fix the problems that one would have with NFS (locking and network load)? That way all the "fro

Ok the db's are ok. still I am having problems

2001-10-28 Thread dino . puller
hi, As you can see by the object, i've a "death by 11" and my libdb is ok. I've read the FAQ at http://cyrus-utils.sourceforge.net/faq/install/deathby11.php (Thanks guys, but you should make it more easy to find :) ) and i know there is a bug into the software and

Re: perl ok now - next problem

2001-03-14 Thread Marco Colombo
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: > I had to compile sendmail with -D_FFR_UNSAFE_SASL, okay. But now I have to > enable the option DontBlameSendmail. But how? It's not clearly mentioned in > the sendmail... err, let's name that 'docs'. ;-) In cf/README (funny name for a file, isn't it?

Re: perl ok now - next problem

2001-03-10 Thread Phil Ellett
ginal Message - From: "Olaf Zaplinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 11:40 PM Subject: perl ok now - next problem > Hi, > > thanks a lot for the hints, I moved two directories from > /usr/local/lib/site_perl to /usr/li

perl ok now - next problem

2001-03-09 Thread Olaf Zaplinski
00:15:23 ridcully service-imapd[16290]: executed Mar 10 00:15:23 ridcully service-imapd[16290]: unable to set close on exec: Bad file descriptor Mar 10 00:15:23 ridcully ^B I get the same log entries when I try to login with cyradm. BTW, it's not DeadRat, it's SuSE 7.1 OK, I fixed tha