Re: Question for upgrading

2019-01-03 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi Javier!, Sorry for the delay and many many thanks for your ideas :) Cheers! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es

Re: Question for upgrading

2019-01-03 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Thank you so much Binarus!!! And as said before, sorry for the big delay!! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es necesar

Re: Question for upgrading

2019-01-03 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi Nic, Sorry for the delay answering... I have been ill and later on holiday, with very very very few time to answer to nothing when coming from illness. Sorry then... My idea really, was to upgrade to 3.0... So I'm planning: - Upgrade in place from 2.3 to 2.4. - Continue giving the servic

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-18 Thread Javier Angulo
On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, Binarus wrote: > On 15.12.2018 17:05, Nic Bernstein wrote: >> On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >>> I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, >>> concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up >>> Cyrus 3.0. I have seen

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-18 Thread Binarus
On 15.12.2018 17:05, Nic Bernstein wrote: > On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >> >> I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, >> concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up >> Cyrus 3.0. I have seen all works properly except for the unexpun

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-18 Thread Binarus
On 13.12.2018 16:52, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, concretely > that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up Cyrus 3.0. I > have seen all works properly except for the unexpunge command because as > someone stated here, a re

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-17 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Thank you so much Ellie!! I would test, read code when needed and finally attempt the upgrade... I think this coud work should say I'm in testing phase still, I'll keep you informed :) Cheers! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 10

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-17 Thread ellie timoney
> Would be fine if Bron, Ellie or someone at Fastmail could tell > something about it to us :) :) Cheeky! Thing is, at FM our production servers more or less track the master branch, so we were running "3.0" from the moment 2.5 forked off, and so our upgrade process only ever really needs to deal

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-17 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi! Yes, I assume there shouldn't be problems... in fact reconstruct in 2.4 does not have the option for upgrading the mailbox databases version with a reconstruct -V max command... So... I assume it's compatible There I could then setup a slave replication... I hope... I'll tell you :) C

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-17 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 10:40 +0100, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > I think (and say think :) )I finally found a method. Although I'm > testing it deeply... it seems (say seems too :) ) 2.4 is compatible > with a mail spool in 2.3 (at least with my config). So I'll try to > upgrade first to 2.4 and lat

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-17 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi mate, I think (and say think :) )I finally found a method. Although I'm testing it deeply... it seems (say seems too :) ) 2.4 is compatible with a mail spool in 2.3 (at least with my config). So I'll try to upgrade first to 2.4 and later to 3.0 setting up a replication from 2.4 to 3.0. Would b

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-16 Thread John Capo via Info-cyrus
On Thu, December 13, 2018 13:25, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > Hi again! > > > Else as a simplication way can you replicate any manner a 2.3 with some > newer version?. At least in manual mode (not rolling)?. The replication protocol in 2.4 is not compatible wit 2.3. There is no easy way. I'm rsy

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-15 Thread Nic Bernstein
On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up Cyrus 3.0. I have seen all works properly except for the unexpunge command because as someone stated here, a recon

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-14 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Common Bron, Ellie, mates :) any advise? Cheers :) :) --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es necesario hacerlo. El 13

Re: Question for upgrading

2018-12-13 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi again! Else as a simplication way can you replicate any manner a 2.3 with some newer version?. At least in manual mode (not rolling)?. Cheers. --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sar

Question for upgrading

2018-12-13 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Good afternoon, I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up Cyrus 3.0. I have seen all works properly except for the unexpunge command because as someone stated here, a reconstruct -V max was needed.The problem