Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Does this patch fix the problem? Will it be accepted into Cyrus?
Just committed to CVS.
On Aug 18, 2005, at 15:24, Scott Russell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had the same thing. It's a bug in cyrus (off by one) so when
they read their own null from the b
Does this patch fix the problem? Will it be accepted into Cyrus?
Alec
On Aug 18, 2005, at 15:24, Scott Russell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had the same thing. It's a bug in cyrus (off by one) so when
they read their own null from the buffer they complain the message
has a null.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had the same thing. It's a bug in cyrus (off by one) so when they
read their own null from the buffer they complain the message has a
null. We patched it. We also sent the patch into cyrus.
Was the patch accepted? I'm not sure when the patch went to the cyrus
Since I use Postfix + DSPAM + Cyrus, I'll chime in.
On Debian sid, with DSPAM built by me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ls -l /usr/local/bin/dspam
~ -r-xr-sr-x 1 dspam mail 1515934 May 11 16:32
/usr/local/bin/dspam
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Greetings all,
I'm having a problem that makes me think I'm just over looking
something silly, but for the life of me, I can't figure out what. I am
sending emails from postfix to dspam as a mailbox_command:
/mailbox_command = /usr/bin/dspam --deliver=innocent --user $USER/
This seems to be
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jure [UTF-8] PeÃar wrote:
Just yesterday i looked into the code, how difficult would be to add
libdspam support into the cyrus lmtp. It needs to be done before sieve and
it needs to modify the message (insert appropriate headers). This is the
only thing that was non-obvious to
Jure Peèar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just yesterday i looked into the code, how difficult would be to add
> libdspam support into the cyrus lmtp. It needs to be done before sieve and
> it needs to modify the message (insert appropriate headers). This is the
> only thing that was non-obvious to
Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christiano,
> We're considering something very much like what you're
> describing. Would you mind passing on postfix, dspam (and any other
> pertinent) configs? It would save quite a bit of time screwing around
> with stuff.
Sure! I will send you the tricks in a
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:28 PM, Christiano Anderson wrote:
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does anyone have experience of running dspam & cyrus? (with sendmail
& without procmail)
I use Postfix + Dspam + Cyrus and it works very fine.
On Postfix I created two different tran
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:40 +0200
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that dspam out of the box is used instead of the local
> mailer, and hence cannot easily be used with cyrus, but I guess that
> doesn't mean it can't be done, just that it might be a bit difficult. I
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have experience of running dspam & cyrus? (with sendmail
> & without procmail)
I use Postfix + Dspam + Cyrus and it works very fine.
On Postfix I created two different transports: users with individual
dspam dat
Hi!
Does anyone have experience of running dspam & cyrus? (with sendmail &
without procmail)
Right now, I use cyrus & MailScanner, where the latter filters virus using
Kaspersky antivirus. It works fine, and I especially like the way
MailScanner handles mail by using to que
12 matches
Mail list logo
