reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hello, I have read some documentation on the new 2.0.7 cyrus server, and I really like the improvements. However, I am a bit concerned about the lack of reconstruct tool that would be compatible with new mailboxes db format. Could somebody, elaborate on the subject ? When are we going to see

Re: reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Ross Golder
Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Could somebody, elaborate on the subject ? When are we going to see such a beast ? Is somebody hacking it together ? If they're not already hacking it together, can someone outline what needs to be done, so a volunteer could have a go at it. We are considering

Re: reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Hello, I have read some documentation on the new 2.0.7 cyrus server, and I really like the improvements. However, I am a bit concerned about the lack of reconstruct tool that would be compatible with new mailboxes db format. What makes you think that it is

Re: reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 16:07:49 -0500 From: Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Oceana Matrix Ltd. What makes you think that it is incompatible? The reconstruct.c source was updated prior to 2.0.3 and seems to work just fine with the current code from CVS. In

Re: reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Rob Tanner
Then how does one go from the flat mailboxes file to mailboxes.db? How does one, for example, upgrade an existing system from 1.x to 2.x? As I plan on doing just that, I'm kind of concerned. -- Rob --On Friday, December 01, 2000 04:42:54 PM -0500 Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: reconstruct compatible with new format ?

2000-12-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Tanner wrote: Then how does one go from the flat mailboxes file to mailboxes.db? How does one, for example, upgrade an existing system from 1.x to 2.x? As I plan on doing just that, I'm kind of concerned. From doc/install-upgrade.html in the 2.x distibution: ctl_mboxlist -u