]
To: Mike Grommet [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: vacation script with optional(??) address parameter
Mike, you do realize that the Vacation script only replies once.
It will not reply multiple times to the same address. Idea is you tell
the
user
Cyrus can't easily determine what your e-mail address is. Since
vacation only responds to messages that explicitly mention you in the
To or Cc header, Cyrus needs to know what addresses to consider as
yours. Without the :addresses field it usually does a pretty poor
job, thus the lack of
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:27:20AM -0500, Mike Grommet wrote:
The example I gave below shows the use of the address parameter to the
vacation function.
According to the RFC tho this is an optional parameter, and if this
parameter is left off then it will just automagically
use the To:
Hi list.
I'm trying to get a vacation script up and running...
In this form, the script works fine:
require vacation;
vacation :days 1:addresses
[[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]] text:
**AUTOGENERATED MESSAGE**
Test!!!
.
Now, when I try to leave the address parameter off, so that it
Mike, you do realize that the Vacation script only replies once.
It will not reply multiple times to the same address. Idea is you tell the
user _ONCE_ that you are on vacation, not 500x.
If you set it up with the mailing list for example, each message you get
would reply with a vacation
