Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread physiculus
Am Mi, 2021-12-01, 13:47 -1000, Bob Newell schrieb: hello, thanks for the reply. i gave gnorb a try, but if i move a message, that is linked with gnorb, i got the following error: gnorb-org-setup-message: Symbol’s function definition is void: second do you know what it means? Regards Jens ---

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
physiculus writes: > Am Mi, 2021-12-01, 13:47 -1000, Bob Newell schrieb: > > hello, > thanks for the reply. > i gave gnorb a try, but if i move a message, that is linked with gnorb, > i got the following error: > gnorb-org-setup-message: Symbol’s function definition is void: second > > do you k

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread physiculus
Am Do, 2021-12-02, 11:20 -0800, Eric Abrahamsen schrieb: hello, the version is 1.6.9 from elpa, installed today. this is the backtrace: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function second) signal(void-function (second)) gnorb-org-setup-message(("nnimap+GMail:gnus#87o860krsm@googlemail.c

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
physiculus writes: > Am Do, 2021-12-02, 11:20 -0800, Eric Abrahamsen > schrieb: > > hello, > the version is 1.6.9 from elpa, installed today. > > this is the backtrace: > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function second) > signal(void-function (second)) > gnorb-org-setup-message(("nnimap

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Heerdegen
Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I honestly don't know what's going on here. There's no call to > `second' in `gnorb-org-setup-message', not even a call to > `cl-second'. Are you comfortable with stepping through functions using > edebug? Wait - the backtrace looks like it's an re-thrown error from the

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Heerdegen
Michael Heerdegen writes: > And indeed - look at `gnorb-reply-to-gnus-link'. OTOH you can also simply look at the compiler warnings... Michael.

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Michael Heerdegen writes: > Michael Heerdegen writes: > >> And indeed - look at `gnorb-reply-to-gnus-link'. > > OTOH you can also simply look at the compiler warnings... I'm still just seeing a call to `cl-second', which is required at compile time. And my, there are a lot of compiler warnings

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Heerdegen
Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I'm still just seeing a call to `cl-second', which is required at > compile time. And my, there are a lot of compiler warnings! But nothing > about second or cl-second... This is where I found it: #+begin_src emacs-lisp (defun gnorb-reply-to-gnus-link (link) "Start a

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Michael Heerdegen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I'm still just seeing a call to `cl-second', which is required at >> compile time. And my, there are a lot of compiler warnings! But nothing >> about second or cl-second... > > This is where I found it: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (defun

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Heerdegen
Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Crap, it's in a commit I've had locally since... late 2020, but never > released. Then now it's one of the best tested commits ever ;-) I have a lot of these myself... Michael.

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Michael Heerdegen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Crap, it's in a commit I've had locally since... late 2020, but never >> released. > > Then now it's one of the best tested commits ever ;-) > > I have a lot of these myself... When we say battle-tested...

Re: question about org-link gnus message and gnus registry

2021-12-02 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
physiculus writes: > hello, > i'm just struggeling about the consistency of an org-link to a gnus message > after moving this message into another folder on same server or a > different one. > > scenario: > i create a org link with org and insert the link into an org file. > works. > > now i move