I've implemented a CRM114 backend for the GNUS spam package. The code
is available at http://dfranke.us/crm114-el.
--
Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dfranke.us
|| =|\
|| * | -|-\- Man is free at the instant he wants to be.
-| =| \
On Sat, 24 May 2008 22:55:50 -0700, Daniel wrote:
> bob2 on #gnus pointed out to me that there is already crm114 support
> in No Gnus. It appears to use mailfilter.crm, which is obsoleted by
> mailreaver.crm.
Interesting, I haven't heard of mailreaver.crm (haven't been following
crm114 either, i
I wrote:
> I've implemented a CRM114 backend for the GNUS spam package. The code
> is available at http://dfranke.us/crm114-el.
bob2 on #gnus pointed out to me that there is already crm114 support
in No Gnus. It appears to use mailfilter.crm, which is obsoleted by
mailreaver.crm. So, as a clar
On Sat, 24 May 2008 15:01:52 -0700 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DF> I've implemented a CRM114 backend for the GNUS spam package. The code
DF> is available at http://dfranke.us/crm114-el.
If you think it's a good idea, we can merge your code with the current
CRM114 support. For spli
On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote:
> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I
> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement: their
> headers and training files are identical. So I think the proper
> approach is to use mailreaver if it exists
On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DF> Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you think it's a good idea, we can merge your code with the current
>> CRM114 support. For splitting, it can do multiple regexes. For
>> training, maybe it can auto-det
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote:
>
>> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I
>> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement: their
>> headers and training files are identical. So I think the prope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> Interesting, I haven't heard of mailreaver.crm (haven't been following
> crm114 either, it is just working).
>
> What are the differences, and should we update spam.el to use
> mailreaver.crm instead?
Quoth the source:
# This is MailReaver, the 3rd
Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you think it's a good idea, we can merge your code with the current
> CRM114 support. For splitting, it can do multiple regexes. For
> training, maybe it can auto-detect which version is in use, with an
> optional user override?
I've never used ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote:
>> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I
>> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement: their
>> headers and training files are identical. So I think the proper
On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:04:53 -0700, Daniel wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote:
>>> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I
>>> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement:
[...]
>> Does
11 matches
Mail list logo