Re: Saving Gnus scoring in IMAP

Björn Bidar via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader (in English)" wrote: > Is it possible to save these information in IMAP e.g. if I more than one > computer? There's Gnus Cloud, but I dont think anyone has tried it in a while. www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ma

Re: Saving Gnus scoring in IMAP

Bob Newell writes: > It would be cool to do this with IMAP but I've never seen a > way to do so. I'd be happy to be wrong about this, of course. I think this could be done by using IMAP METADATA RFC5464: - https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/imap_metadata/ - https://www.rfc-editor.org/

Re: Saving Gnus scoring in IMAP

Björn Bidar via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader (in English)" writes: > Hey, > > Is it possible to save these information in IMAP e.g. if I more than one > computer? The way I do this is by keeping the relevant gnus files (and many others) in sync acros

Saving Gnus scoring in IMAP

Hey, Is it possible to save these information in IMAP e.g. if I more than one computer? Br, Björn

Re: Thread and Followups scoring rules.

mail.com" 1000 nil s) > ("Oleksandr Gavenkoa" 1000 nil s))) The former, er, does what the manual says. It creates new entries based on previous entries so that scoring happens even if the References header is trimmed. > Seems that this paragraph document 'I/L f/t&#x

Re: scoring emails based on the To and Cc headers

Mark Longair writes: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Scoring-On-Other-Headers.html > > ... says that one can get around this limitation by adding the following > to .gnus: But you still have to score on "extra" headers. Try doing the c

How to debug scoring?

Currently I call: (gnus-score-adaptive) ; have no key binding (gnus-score-save) ; have no key binding (gnus-score-flush-cache) ; V F (gnus-summary-rescore); V R Most correct way still (gnus-summary-exit) but it take some time to enter to group *Summary* again... -- Best

scoring emails based on the To and Cc headers

buffer, it shows a score of 1000 for those messages. However, the "To" rule doesn't match. I've seen in the documentation here: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Score-File-Format.html ... that "Scoring can only be performed on these eight h

Thread and Followups scoring rules.

This part of (info "(gnus)Score File Format") very hard to understand: Six keys are supported by this alist: `STRING' If the key is a string, it is the name of the header to perform the match on. Scoring can only be performed on these eight headers: `

Re: Are there any "advanced" tutorial on GNUS scoring?

Oleksandr Gavenko writes: > * How to kill followups to trolls forever? I do this via manual edit of the score file. Find the score entry in the from section and copy to followup section. I think this is the coolest thing in Gnus. Well, next to scoring followups to my own posts. BTW, si

Re: Are there any "advanced" tutorial on GNUS scoring?

uot;thread" new addition to GNUS (I don't >remember it when read GNUS manual from Emacs 22)? (info "(gnus) Adaptive Scoring") of Emacs 24.2.1 mentions `followup' and 'message-id' as score types, but not `thread.' Perhaps you should

Re: Are there any "advanced" tutorial on GNUS scoring?

On 2013-03-31, Adam Sjøgren wrote: > Oleksandr Gavenko writes: > >> Today I make my fifth attempt to configure GNUS scoring. And again I >> fail to do this. > > The easiest way to get help is often: > > * Describe what you want to happen > * Describe wha

Re: Are there any "advanced" tutorial on GNUS scoring?

Oleksandr Gavenko writes: > Today I make my fifth attempt to configure GNUS scoring. And again I > fail to do this. The easiest way to get help is often: * Describe what you want to happen * Describe what you did * Describe what you expected to happen * Describe what happened i

Are there any "advanced" tutorial on GNUS scoring?

Today I make my fifth attempt to configure GNUS scoring. And again I fail to do this. Root of failure: * huge and complicated official documentation * incomplete or over-complicated examples in Internet * foreign ~/.gnus.el looks too cryptic -- Best regards

Re: Scoring followups to yourself when using drafts or gnus-delay?

Anssi Saari writes: >>> (add-hook >>> 'message-sent-hook 'gnus-score-followup-article) >>> >>> The problem with that is that gnus-draft-send (which gnus-delay also >>> uses when sending) doesn't run message-sent-hook. >> >> Hm... No, I don't think that's possible. > > Well, could you consider

Re: Scoring followups to yourself when using drafts or gnus-delay?

Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Anssi Saari writes: > >> Is there an easy way to score up followups to messages when you saved a >> draft or used gnus-delay? The easy way for direct posting is just >> >> (add-hook >> 'message-sent-hook 'gnus-score-followup-article) >> >> The problem with that is t

Re: Scoring followups to yourself when using drafts or gnus-delay?

Anssi Saari writes: > Is there an easy way to score up followups to messages when you saved a > draft or used gnus-delay? The easy way for direct posting is just > > (add-hook > 'message-sent-hook 'gnus-score-followup-article) > > The problem with that is that gnus-draft-send (which gnus-delay

Scoring followups to yourself when using drafts or gnus-delay?

Is there an easy way to score up followups to messages when you saved a draft or used gnus-delay? The easy way for direct posting is just (add-hook 'message-sent-hook 'gnus-score-followup-article) The problem with that is that gnus-draft-send (which gnus-delay also uses when sending) doesn't r

Re: Scoring

Tassilo Horn writes: >> It is bad to have adaptive scoring that overwrite user setting with >> probably have high height in most cases. > > Thanks for confirming that there's indeed some problem here. I'll go > and ask on the development list. > > And the hi

Re: Scoring

Oleksandr Gavenko writes: Hi Oleksandr, >> Incidentally, my adaptive scoring rules add the score 5 to read >> messages. So can it be that adaptive scoring overrides my manual >> score changes? > > Currently I have trapped to same issue. Look for response to me: > >

Re: Scoring

On 2012-09-26, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Hi all, > > I use adaptive scoring for years, but now I wanted to upscore one thread > manually, too. So I've hit `I T RET' in the summary with point on that > thread, but `V S' on it after reentering the summary shows that it w

Scoring

Hi all, I use adaptive scoring for years, but now I wanted to upscore one thread manually, too. So I've hit `I T RET' in the summary with point on that thread, but `V S' on it after reentering the summary shows that it was only scored up 5 "dollars", not 1000 as sugg

Scoring and new messages

Hello, I would like for newly received messages in a thread whose score I have previously lowered (manually) to also receive this lower score (so I won't be bothered by them). This does not seem to be the default behavior. Is there any way to accomplish this? Furthermore, I have one group where I

gnus-score-followup-article ignore gnus-use-scoring

Hello, I have this in my .gnus file: (add-hook 'message-sent-hook 'gnus-score-followup-article) and I've a group which disables the scoring through group parameter. I expect for this group to not have any score files at all when I send article but gnus have created a score file

Low-scoring a troll and direct replies

Let's say I want to low-score a certain Usenet troll as well as all direct replies to troll's messages. I think I can do this with a this kind of rule: ((| ("from" "Troll " s) (1- ("from" "Troll " s))) -1000) But it doesn't seem to match always for replies. I believe that the pro

Re: gnus scoring insanity

Tassilo Horn writes: > Tassilo Horn writes: > > Hi again! > >> You can, but there's interactive support for that, too. When reading >> some very interesting article hit `I', if it's stupid hit `D' >> (increase/decrease score) and some scorin

Gnus info printable version (was: gnus scoring insanity)

Memnon Anon writes: > I think its time to quote the manual > > ,[ (info "(gnus)On Writing Manuals") ] > |This, of course, means that this manual has no, or little, flow. It > | documents absolutely everything in Gnus, but often not where you're > | looking for it. It is a reference manu

Re: gnus scoring insanity

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:37:49 -0600, not...@bb.nothome.com wrote: >> . it kind of almost makes sense. > That's reassuring, almost. Exactly. (If you can't hear the tongue-in-cheek in that paragraph, you must be needin' a hearing aid.) >> Written many reference manuals, have you? :-) > Surpr

Re: gnus scoring insanity

a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:45:08 -0600, not...@bb.nothome.com wrote: > You can if you want to - if you don't you can use the commands listed in > the manual. Here's an amazing fact. Of all the commands I've learned and currently use in gnus, not a single o

Re: gnus scoring insanity

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:45:08 -0600, not...@bb.nothome.com wrote: >> I use scoring very simply: To not see articles from people I've becomed >> tired of. > Feel free to include me. I thought about using you as the example, but decided against it. Apart from your tone of

Re: gnus scoring insanity

Memnon Anon writes: > So if you stay with it, maybe you are the right one to write that > 'different book' ;). I would like to. I've been using linux for seven years and learning gnus has been about the most difficult hurdle I've encountered. slrn is so much easier. I can see why it's more p

Re: gnus scoring insanity

not...@bb.nothome.com writes: > a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: >> They were probably obvious to the author at the time. > Or they were on drugs. ;) I think its time to quote the manual ,[ (info "(gnus)On Writing Manuals") ] |This, of course, means that this manual has no, or

Re: gnus scoring insanity

Tassilo Horn writes: Hi again! > You can, but there's interactive support for that, too. When reading > some very interesting article hit `I', if it's stupid hit `D' > (increase/decrease score) and some scoring wizard will ask you on what > to score. Ups, the k

Re: gnus scoring insanity

s manual that I should create any files and > what and where those files should be named/located. Go to the gnus manual (C-h i d m gnus RET) Find the chapter "Scoring". The first subsection is "Summary Score Commands" which shows what you need to get started: L and I These gi

Re: gnus scoring insanity

not...@bb.nothome.com writes: Hi! > Interesting. Was I supposed to manually create the all.SCORE file? You can, but there's interactive support for that, too. When reading some very interesting article hit `I', if it's stupid hit `D' (increase/decrease score) and some

Re: gnus scoring insanity

a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > It seems it is the same deal as with all the other things you are > complaining about. I prefer to think of 'em as salty observations. > I use scoring very simply: To not see articles from people I've becomed > tired of. F

Re: gnus scoring insanity

not...@bb.nothome.com writes: > Been using gnus for newsgroups for a couple weeks. I really like it > and while I wish for some functions like slrn, the bennies far > outweigh the downside with one exception! > > What's the deal with scoring for newsgroups? I've rea

Re: gnus scoring insanity

not...@bb.nothome.com writes: > Geez, gnus is hard enough. Could it be made any harder by talking in > circles and using proprietary terms without defining them? Anyone > know of a gnus scoring tutorial for complete moron newbies like > myself? And yes, I WILL write a better how

Re: gnus scoring insanity

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:13:03 -0600, not...@bb.nothome.com wrote: > What's the deal with scoring for newsgroups? It seems it is the same deal as with all the other things you are complaining about. I use scoring very simply: To not see articles from people I've becomed tired of. To

gnus scoring insanity

Been using gnus for newsgroups for a couple weeks. I really like it and while I wish for some functions like slrn, the bennies far outweigh the downside with one exception! What's the deal with scoring for newsgroups? I've read half the gnus Scoring section and understand none o

Re: Scoring

On 22 Apr 2009, lguse...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: > David Breton writes: > >> I would like to have scoring do something and I can't figure out how to >> do it so I thought I'd ask here. >> >> There's this guy on one of the newsgroup I read. Every

Re: Scoring

Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Breton writes: > >> I would like to have scoring do something and I can't figure out how to >> do it so I thought I'd ask here. >> >> There's this guy on one of the newsgroup I read. Every time he enters a >> thre

Re: Scoring

David Breton writes: > I would like to have scoring do something and I can't figure out how to > do it so I thought I'd ask here. > > There's this guy on one of the newsgroup I read. Every time he enters a > thread, it goes downhill really fast, you know the type.

Scoring

Hi, I would like to have scoring do something and I can't figure out how to do it so I thought I'd ask here. There's this guy on one of the newsgroup I read. Every time he enters a thread, it goes downhill really fast, you know the type. So what I would like to do is kill all

Re: Scoring

David Breton writes: > Hi, > > I would like to have scoring do something and I can't figure out how to > do it so I thought I'd ask here. > > There's this guy on one of the newsgroup I read. Every time he enters a > thread, it goes downhill really fast, y

Scoring gnus folders

Is it possible to get Gnus to score incoming articles as they download as opposed to when you enter a group? Currently I might see a group with 3 unread but then I enter the group and scoring is applies at that time they might disappear. I would prefer to score before updating the summary

scoring not working: what to check?

e looked at directory and file permissions, comparing the News directory with that from an Ubuntu machine which does work, and another Debian machine on which the scoring also works, and have come up blank as to what could be the problem. I am resigned to the fact that perhaps it is something in my .em

Scoring on Digest mails

I subscribe to some mailing lists in digest mode and I increased the score on some writers of the list on the "from" header after hitting C-d on the digest mail. Now all the digest mails have been scored up and are appearing in bold. I'd like to revert this; will deleting the relevant SCORE and

Adaptive scoring doesn't work

om -1) (subject -1 (setq gnus-parameters '(("mail\\..*" (gnus-use-adaptive-scoring nil)) ("gmane\\..*" (gnus-use-adaptive-scoring t But these settings in gnus-parameters doesn't work, others settings it works properly. If I do:

Re: Recursive scoring or articles

Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29 2007, Sebastian Krause wrote: >> Since the troll-feeding posts will just be as annoying, lines 3-5 >> should be *automatically* killed together with line 2. > > Adding this rule should help: > > ("followup" > ("some troll" -1 nil s) E

Re: Recursive scoring or articles

On Sun, Jul 29 2007, Sebastian Krause wrote: > 1. [ interesting post ] > 2.[ troll A answers ] > 3. [ posting feeding the troll ] > 4. [ more food ] > 5. [ another troll ] > 6.[ good answer ] > 7.[ another good answer ] > > Now let's assumene I've already killed t

Re: Recursive scoring or articles

Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29 2007, Sebastian Krause wrote: >> I'm wondering if it's possible to apply a score of an article to all >> of its follow-ups. In detail I would like to kill a whole subthread >> that follows an article I've killed with some negative score. > >

Re: Recursive scoring or articles

`L r S' what you have in mind? Cf. (info "(gnus)Summary Score Commands") > Maybe something with adaptive scoring and the references headers? > Unfortunately I couldn't find anything. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- |

Recursive scoring or articles

Hello! I'm wondering if it's possible to apply a score of an article to all of its follow-ups. In detail I would like to kill a whole subthread that follows an article I've killed with some negative score. Maybe something with adaptive scoring and the references headers? Unfortuna

Re: scoring help

"Robert D. Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is pretty obvious. I do have one question, though. The variable > gnus-use-adaptive-scoring can be set to line or word, in addition to t > and nil. If set globally to nil, and set to t in this group, does it >

Re: scoring crossposts

least you can ask. That said, the increase in size from Newsgroups' presence in overviews is not at all large in the usual case, and is really totally eclipsed by e.g. References chains that always already appear in overviews. "Extra" scoring is referenced at the end of info://Gnus/T

scoring crossposts

I'm trying to score crossposts down. I found this piece of code: ("xref" ;; the more cross posting, the exponentially worse the article ("^xref: \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+" -1 nil r) ("^xref: \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+" -2 nil r) ("^xref: \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+ \\S-+" -4 nil

scoring help

I am probably making this a lot harder than it need be, but I would like for somebody to tell me that I have my head wrapped around this the right way. I would like to use adaptive scoring in nntp groups only. I really only want to set things up so that if I kill a message, I do not see the

Re: scoring followups based on arbitrary headers

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes: > ((| >(message-id ".googlegroups.com") >(references ".googlegroups.com")) > -1) or, erm, actually ((| ("message-id" ".googlegroups.com") ("references" ".googlegroups.com")) -1) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTE

Re: scoring followups based on arbitrary headers

issdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a different approach, totally *untested* > > ((| > (& >(message-id ".googlegroups.com") >(! (subject "^Re:" R))) > (references "^<[^>]*\\.googlegroups\\.com" r)) > -1000) I ended up with something a little simpler: ((| (message-id ".googlegroup

Re: scoring followups based on arbitrary headers

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Does anyone have an example of a score rule which will kill an entire > thread - like a followup rule - based on other headers than From? For > instance, scoring down threads initiated by Google Groups users > (X-Trace: posting.google.com) would greatly

scoring followups based on arbitrary headers

Does anyone have an example of a score rule which will kill an entire thread - like a followup rule - based on other headers than From? For instance, scoring down threads initiated by Google Groups users (X-Trace: posting.google.com) would greatly increase the readability of a number of comp

Scoring followups when posting from the draft group?

Is there a way to score followups to my posts when they are sent from the draft group? It would seem that Gnus should run message-sent-hook in this case as well, but it doesn't. ___ Info-gnus-english mailing list Info-gnus-english@gnu.org http://lists.gn

Re: adaptive scoring questions?

I have learned how to use adaptive score. Thanks. -- .:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:. . * . ./.\ excuses are the easiest things . . /..'\ to manufacture . . /'.'\ and the hardest things to sell. . /.

Re: adaptive scoring questions?

On Sun, Nov 13 2005, leon wrote: > I want gnus to adaptively score groups in topic [News] but not in > [Emails]. Here is how I configure it. I move my cursor to topic [News] > and press 'G p' then I enter the following lines: > > ((score-file . "emacs.SCORE")) This should go to the score file, no

Re: adaptive scoring questions?

handles news group. Now > I start reading news groups from many sources. I come to the point I > want gnus to handle scoring articles automatically. I start with some > articles in emacswiki for exmaple > "http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/ScoreFile"

adaptive scoring questions?

es. I come to the point I want gnus to handle scoring articles automatically. I start with some articles in emacswiki for exmaple "http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/ScoreFile"; My group buffer looks like this [GNUS] [News] ... ... ...