Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Yi Ning Chen

2013-09-23 Thread Yi Ning Chen
Hi Fedora Community, My name is Yi Ning Chen (irc: ynchen) from Boston and I would like to join the Fedora Infrastructure Team. I have been using Fedora for a few years and have acquired a RHCE certificate. I have interned and volunteered at the Free Software Foundation. I helped setup thei

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread nitesh narayan lal
Hi, On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Chris Roberts wrote: > Could we have a space setup where people could upload, but have to be in > a Video FAS group in order to push/commit the videos? I agree there needs > to be a review process setup. Option 2 is starting to look good now :) > > Something

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Chris Roberts
Could we have a space setup where people could upload, but have to be in a Video FAS group in order to push/commit the videos? I agree there needs to be a review process setup. Option 2 is starting to look good now :) ___ infrastructure mailing li

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread nitesh narayan lal
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:28:07 -0400 > "Chris Roberts" wrote: > > > Kevin, > > > > The ones Ralph made are in ogv format, I am not sure about the ones > > on Youtube or Vimeo. It would be awesome if we could get a repo or > > storage area setu

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/23/2013 11:12 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Considering I've been involved with infrastructure since at least 2004. I think I classify as one of the long term infrastructure guys and I do not agree with you. There is possibly some cases where it's better to just report upstream. If we want

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Considering I've been involved with infrastructure since at least 2004. I think I classify as one of the long term infrastructure guys and I do not agree with you. There is possibly some cases where it's better to just report upstream. How would we document and make sure that the message got out

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:51:55 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: ...snip... > And quite frankly I doubt that any of the infrastructure team that > has been here long enough disagrees with this being the right course > of action. Well, I do... or at least I don't find it to be any kind of super

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:36:51 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/20/2013 07:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > I really dont see any compelling reasons to move > > off of Red Hats bugzilla today. > > After bit of discussion there is a compelling reason to move entirely > away from Red Ha

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/23/2013 10:19 PM, Tristan Santore wrote: So, PLEASE! Where are the arguments for and against this proposal. Actually there have been many RH developers as well as other upstream ones in our community requesting this for many years but just go through the devel list archives or the deskt

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Tristan Santore
On 23/09/13 22:36, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/20/2013 07:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> I really dont see any compelling reasons to move >> off of Red Hats bugzilla today. > > After bit of discussion there is a compelling reason to move entirely > away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as

Re: Migrating to our own bugzilla instance.

2013-09-23 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/20/2013 07:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: I really dont see any compelling reasons to move off of Red Hats bugzilla today. After bit of discussion there is a compelling reason to move entirely away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as away from hosting our own and probably is the correct way

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:28:07 -0400 "Chris Roberts" wrote: > Kevin, > > The ones Ralph made are in ogv format, I am not sure about the ones > on Youtube or Vimeo. It would be awesome if we could get a repo or > storage area setup in Fedora Infrastructure so we can have these > local to the Fedor

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Chris Roberts
Kevin, The ones Ralph made are in ogv format, I am not sure about the ones on Youtube or Vimeo. It would be awesome if we could get a repo or storage area setup in Fedora Infrastructure so we can have these local to the Fedora project as well. - Chris Roberts >>> Kevin Fenzi 9/23/2013 12:0

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:44:16 +0100 Tristan Santore wrote: > Judging by the wiki spam, I already see hidden video adverts for > Viagra and co. On our wiki? Please do send me any pages you see with this sort of thing so it can be reverted. I've not noticed any wiki spam in a while, and when I se

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Tristan Santore
On 23/09/13 17:48, Chris Roberts wrote: > I like option 1 personally, I think it would be easier to setup and if > someone joins the video group and have something to upload they can > right away. > > I would like to get a few other opinions though, I have included the > video mailing list to get

Re: Fedora Infrastructure Video Published

2013-09-23 Thread Chris Roberts
I like option 1 personally, I think it would be easier to setup and if someone joins the video group and have something to upload they can right away. I would like to get a few other opinions though, I have included the video mailing list to get Nitesh's input too. - Chris 1. Just setup a

Re: Trac - Batchmodify

2013-09-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:04:32 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 1: Is it allowable to change the plugin, > >so "Ticket Description" can be cleared on mass (to do) > > I don't see a way off hand to get it to change description. ;( > > Perhaps ask upstream to add that? No longer maintained upstr

Re: Updated totpcgi version with support for token reprovisioning

2013-09-23 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I released a new version of totpcgi today, which adds support for >> token reprovisioning. It's a most commonly requested feature and >> supports issuing a new token if you still have access to either your >> old device, or to the scratch cod

Re: Trac - Batchmodify

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:29:48 +0100 Frank Murphy wrote: > As "batchmodify" in logner a plugin, > but integrated into Trac 1.x > http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/BatchModifyPlugin > > 1: Is it allowable to change the plugin, >so "Ticket Description" can be cleared on mass (to do) I don't see a way

Re: Updated totpcgi version with support for token reprovisioning

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:21:31 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > Hi, all: > > I released a new version of totpcgi today, which adds support for > token reprovisioning. It's a most commonly requested feature and > supports issuing a new token if you still have access to either your > old device,

Planned Outage: Cloud networking - 2013-09-25 17:00 UTC

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage: Cloud networking - 2013-09-25 17:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2013-09-25 17:00 UTC, which will last approximately 0.5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2013-09-25 17: