Re: December status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

0. harrisonb (email: harri...@harrisonbrock.com) 1. I have only logged into the main sever. I have only been in this group about a week. I plan to work 10 – 15 hours week. 2. Right now I'm not sure what all I would like to do but I would like to get more into DevOps 3. Yes. I'm looking at

Plan for tomorrow's Fedora Infrastructure meeting - 2016-12-15

The infrastructure team will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow, 2016-12-15 at 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on the freenode network. We have a gobby document (see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby ) fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next is the document. Please try and review and edit that

Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Murali Krish

IRC : mk779 Hello I'm Murali Krish, I've knowlege in HTML,CSS , JAVA , SQL,Linux and I've a year of Developement experience and Basic Knowlege of Python,AWS(Willing to learn). I want to be a part of fedora community and help the Fedora Project grow. I'm intreseted in DevOps and so I want to

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On 12/14/2016 05:02 PM, Athos Ribeiro wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: Okay, so needs here are: Sysadminy/packager stuff: - some more hands on deck for routine administration - updating to newest codebase - package as RPM? - update

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Okay, so needs here are: > > > Sysadminy/packager stuff: > > - some more hands on deck for routine administration > > - updating to newest codebase > - package as RPM? > - update ansible playbooks > > -

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > - updating to newest codebase > - package as RPM? Looks like I left out "Figure out how to get running with either Django 1.6 (EL7) or 1.9 (F25)". -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Justin W. Flory wrote: > One of the things I've wished we could have done is integrate into > the StackExchange network of Q sites. The benefits of using this > service is that we have also have a much larger community who has > access to the site and

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 06:00:58PM -, Josh Boyer wrote: > However, I'm concerned about setting the precedent of paying to host > a service. The cost to Fedora to host it is not in machine time or > bandwidth, but in sysadmin and maintenance. Ideally, some of those This is a good point that I

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

Le 14/12/2016 à 20:54, Justin W. Flory a écrit : I think if the big question becomes *what to do with Ask Fedora*, we should give special consideration to choosing a route forward that will provide the best user experience for people who are (1) asking questions, and (2) answering the

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

On 12/14/2016 01:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Ask Fedora is one of our primary user-facing support resources. It's reasonably successful, with over 18,000 questions, with almost 80% of those having at least some answer. It has a small but active and passionate community. On the other hand, I've

Re: December status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

0. bry2112 1. Not yet - made attempt, but unable to login. Busy with XMas shopping to fix 2. NA 3. NA 4. Yes 5. Just more time to review issues 6. Finding issues with my experience 7. No 8. No 9. Mad Max (Fury Road) - with lots 'o beer included On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Kevin

Re: The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

> Ask Fedora is one of our primary user-facing support resources. It's > reasonably successful, with over 18,000 questions, with almost 80% of > those having at least some answer. It has a small but active and > passionate community. > > On the other hand, I've heard from the infrastructure team

Re: Cert penning, Certs and related

On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:51:25 -0500 Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, at 02:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > The various browsers already have our digicert cert hard coded. > > So, if we ever had problems with that cert and had to switch to the > > secondary or

Re: Cert penning, Certs and related

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:16:47 -0500 Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 10:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > FYI, I marked this thread to reply to, but I simply have not had > > time lately with last week on site at the datacenter and this > > weekend prepping for the

Weekly Koji Infra Tag Report

This is a list of packages in the various infrastructure koji tags Please check and make sure there are not any that can be removed/dropped ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Cert penning, Certs and related

On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:14:48 -0500 Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, at 02:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > The various browsers already have our digicert cert hard coded. > > Hum, really? Reference? > > $ pwd > /home/walters/src/github/mozilla/gecko-dev > $

The Future of Ask Fedora (potentially: hosted by upstream)

Ask Fedora is one of our primary user-facing support resources. It's reasonably successful, with over 18,000 questions, with almost 80% of those having at least some answer. It has a small but active and passionate community. On the other hand, I've heard from the infrastructure team that it's

Re: src.fedoraproject.org vs pkgs.fedoraproject.org and TLS

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 11:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We missed fixing this when we made changes sunday night. > Oops. Thanks for pointing it out. > > I have now done so, and it should only offer https:// It works now, thanks! https://github.com/CentOS/sig-atomic-buildscripts/pull/202