Re: Proposed zchunk file format - V3

2018-03-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along >> the way. > > Oh, thanks. I screwed up (again), this time by hitting "Reply" > instead of "Reply to all"

Re: Libravatar shutting down on 2018-09-01

2018-04-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote: > I was reseraching a little bit and I found that this project is made in > python with Django. Is it possible that we can take this project and do an > implementation of our own? > I don't know if there's a reason _not_ to take over the proje

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Zchunk update

2018-04-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > It's been a number of weeks since my last update, so I thought I'd let > everyone know where things are at. > > I've spent most of these last few weeks reworking zchunk's API to make > it easier to use and more in line with what other compr

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Zchunk update

2018-04-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 09:00 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> > I've also added zchunk support to createrepo_c (see >> > https://github.com/jdieter/

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Zchunk update

2018-04-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 17:39 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> > On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 09:08 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: >> > > Hello Jonathan, >> > > >> > > Once it is in createrepo

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Patch review request: zchunk patches for dnf, libsolv and librepo

2018-06-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 5:21 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > I've finally finished writing patches to integrate zchunk support into > dnf/libsolv/librepo[1], and I'd greatly appreciate some code review. A > vast majority of the code is in librepo, but libsolv has been expanded > to support zchunk f

Re: [CoreOS] Migrating from fedimg to ore

2018-07-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:50 PM Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > > Last few days, I spent doing a feasibility analysis on the migrating > from fedimg to ore, a subproject of mantle to release the Fedora cloud > images. > > ore/mantle comes from the CoreOS community. mantle is comprised of > multiple util

Re: [CoreOS] Re: Migrating from fedimg to ore

2018-07-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:50 AM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On 07/22/2018 04:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Is there a good reason to migrate from fedimg to ore instead of > > implementing what we "like" from ore in fedimg? > > Mostly the fac

epel7-infra and epel7 conflicts wrt pagure updates (or, can we have an epel7-infra DistTag?)

2018-09-27 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, So as you all know, Pagure 5.0 was released[1]. With 5.0, I've taken over primary maintenance of the package outside of epel7-infra, which means that Fedora and EPEL7 packages are generally maintained by me (with packaging changes generally synced from upstream), since Pierre-Yves doesn't

Re: epel7-infra and epel7 conflicts wrt pagure updates (or, can we have an epel7-infra DistTag?)

2018-09-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 09/27/2018 01:50 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On 09/27/2018 10:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we change epel7-infra so that the DistTag > >> defined in %dist is ".el7.inf

Re: FAS & openid application development

2018-10-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:24 AM Radka Janekova wrote: > > Hi, > > please excuse me if this information is somewhere and I failed to find it... > > I'm looking for a way to add an application / get an id, to be used in a web > application used to authenticate the user with Fedora account. I did no

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

2018-12-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSBS to > build the fedora container base image, indeed OSBS has the capability > to build a base container image using a kickstart file. > To do this OSBS needs a Docke

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

2019-01-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > > Forwarding info I got from Tomas off-line... > > """ > oz should be py3-ready according to clancellete (not tested by me). I've > started some work on ImageFactory, but didn't get too far as there were other > priorities. It seemed to b

Re: do we use mash any more?

2019-01-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:11 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > I was going to update the Mash README at https://pagure.io/mash to > indicate that the Fedora Project no longer uses this software, but I > wanted to be sure that's really true. > Mash is dead. We killed it a little over a year ago. -- 真実はい

What are we going to do about sigul?

2019-01-21 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired during Fedora 29 development due to constant breakage. This means that sigul is in danger of being retired in Fedora. Unfortunately, sigul is the o

Re: Project Details

2019-01-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:07 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am trying to get a handle on the number of projects that we are > actively working on for any given day of the week. Could I ask everybody to > reply here with some information. At a minimum if you could share with me: > >

Re: Project Details

2019-01-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:45 AM Karsten Hopp wrote: > > Wow, that's an impressive list ! > > Mine is much shorter: > > - Pagure (see above) > Well, I work on Pagure too. I'm the maintainer for Pagure in Fedora and EPEL now, as well as in Mageia and openSUSE. Mainly I fix things related to makin

Re: Future of fedora-packages

2019-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:43 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 05:39, Clement Verna wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> fedora-packages [0] code base is showing its age. The code base and >> the technology stack (Turbogears2 [1] web framework and the Moksha >> [2] middleware) is currently n

Re: Future of fedora-packages

2019-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:56 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 14:36, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:20 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > 2. Packaging of elasticsearch was a mess. At the time we had rules > > > that all packages needed t

Re: Future of fedora-packages

2019-03-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 2/26/19 11:38 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > fedora-packages [0] code base is showing its age. The code base and > > the technology stack (Turbogears2 [1] web framework and the Moksha > > [2] middleware) is currently not ready

Re: cloud retirement

2019-03-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 4:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 3/1/19 4:36 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 27. 02. 19 v 23:00 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > >>> Hey everyone. > >>> > >>> As you know, we currently have a RHOSP5 ancient cloud. After a bunch of > >>> work last year, we got a RHOSP13 cloud u

Re: How do we turn zchunk on for updates-testing for F30?

2019-03-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:28 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > Hey, I just noticed that, while we have zchunked metadata for the F30 > base repository, it's not enabled to for updates-testing. > > I've looked in the ansible repo and in pungi, but I can't see where > createrepo_c is actually called for

Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-09 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python 3 wherever possible: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4 The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on the upstream spec for Koji, which accounts for all the variations (Py2 Koji + Py3 client for Fedora

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:53 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 22:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python > > 3 wherever possible: > > https:/

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:57 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 10:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:53 AM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 22:19, Neal Gompa wrote: >

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:42 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python > > > 3 wherever possible: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4 > > > > > > The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on t

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:12 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python > > > > > 3 wherever possible: > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4 > > > > > > > > > > The PR is a bit c

Re: Koji 1.17.0 and Python 3

2019-03-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:44 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > I disabled autopushing precisely so that there's no accidental pushing > > to stable updates. The worst thing that can happen is that we have to > > unpush the update from testing. Seriously, that's really not the end > > of the world. >

Re: What are we going to do about sigul?

2019-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 1/21/19 10:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable > > in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired &

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi > > > > > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which would > > replace checks performed by autocloud. > > > > (CC'ed tflink and kparal) > > Does taskotron provides capa

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi > > > wr

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:21 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:10:59AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:32 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:22:31AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:21 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:10:59AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrot

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-05-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:48 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On 5/1/19 10:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 18:57 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:47 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sinny Kumari wrote: > >>> > > >

Re: Retire keys.fedoraproject.org?

2019-07-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:15 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:47:36PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > As some of you may have read: > > > > https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f > > and > > https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blo

Re: proposal: move pagure01 and pagure-stg01 to rdu2

2019-07-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > I'd like to propose we migrate pagure01 (which is pagure.io) and > pagure-stg01 (pagure-stg.io) from osuosl to the community cage in rdu2. > What is "community cage in rdu2"? What is "rdu2"? Where is it? > We have had odd netwo

Re: BYO Jenkins for Pagure CI?

2019-07-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 2:37 PM Justin W. Flory wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was looking into Pagure CI with Jenkins, but it wasn't clear if there > is a Fedora-provided Jenkins server or if someone needs to bring their > own Jenkins build infrastructure for Pagure CI. > > If there is a Fedora-provide

Re: [FBR] Upgrade pagure in production

2019-08-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning, > > A bit before freeze started, we upgrade pagure to 5.7.4 on src.fp.o but forgot > to do pagure.io > Since then there has been 4 small bug fixes releases (most of which are > related > to src.fp.o), changelog is at: ht

Re: State/future of the packages app

2019-09-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I was looking for information on the future of the packages >> application[1]. I didn't see it mentioned in the commblog post[2]. > > > Currently the application is in

Re: State/future of the packages app

2019-09-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:20 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 08:41, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, An

Re: State/future of the packages app

2019-09-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:51 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main > > > reason it was not included in the ap

Re: repospanner and our Ansible repo

2019-09-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:47 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > > stickster asked me today how these numbers would compare to > Git{Hub,Lab}. I did a bit of testing with GitLab just now. > > Note that this isn't a particularly apples to apples test, because my > repospanner nodes were on the same virtual ho

Re: repospanner and our Ansible repo

2019-09-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 09:44, Randy Barlow > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 19:01 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, do we know where the bottlenecks are in > > > repoSpa

Re: communishift reinstall

2019-10-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 07:38:04PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:37 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > Greetings communishift group (and infrastructure list). > > > > >

Re: communishift reinstall

2019-10-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Sorry for the delay here. The re-install took yesterday, last night and > into today. ;( (Mostly due to hardware and os deployment issues). > > Anyhow, it's all re-installed and set back up, feel free to re-import > your applications/projects

Re: The packages app has a short runway

2019-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:13 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 18:07, Randy Barlow > wrote: >> >> Greetings! >> >> The packages app is running on Fedora 30, and its dependencies are not >> available in Fedora 31+ as I understand it. >> >> This means it has about 7 months bef

Re: The packages app has a short runway

2019-10-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 20:12 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > The packages app (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/) was > > originally running on RHEL6, I tried to move it to RHEL 7 but they > > were some dependencies missing there so we

Re: The packages app has a short runway

2019-10-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:48 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 21:42 Randy Barlow wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 14:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > It's not a bad feature to have in fedpkg, but it fundamentally does >> > n

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-10-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:19 AM Chris Rainey wrote: > > I just noticed that my FAS account has an automatic(?) @fedoraproject.org > email address. Is there an "Inbox" for this or is it just an alias to my > "Primary" account address for privacy, etc.? > The latter. You can set up your email cl

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-10-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:27 AM Chris Rainey wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification. I just received this "reject" notice when > sending a test msg. So, if I understand correctly, it is non-deliverable from > the outside world and can simply be used as the "From:" address in my MUA? > No, peo

Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2019-11-16 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, In the interest of helping to modernize the infrastructure Fedora runs on, I'm working on introducing Pagure into EPEL8. This will hopefully allow us to upgrade our Pagure instances to use RHEL 8 instead of RHEL 7, and notably, make the transition (mostly) complete for moving all Python s

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2019-11-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I've done an early build locally to determine what's needed to make > > this possible. The following report from DNF indicates the missing > >

Re: status.fedoraproject.org

2019-11-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi. > For long time, I plan to do something about > https://status.fedoraproject.org/ > > I think that manual updates of this page does not reflect the capabilities of > these century. > > My question is: do we want to go SasS way? I fou

Re: CPE Weekly: 2019-11-29

2019-11-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail! > > > > Background: > > The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining > IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep >

Re: moving bugzilla overrides to dist-git

2019-12-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:39 AM Karsten Hopp wrote: > > Hi, > > We are currently working on getting rid of the git repo at > fedora-scm-requests [1] which is nowadays only used to store the overrides of > the default assignee in bugzilla (for example to allow different default > assignee for Fed

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:57 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Fedora has been part of an GPG sks service[1] for a number of years running > off of keys.fedoraproject.org. Last year, there were a number of attacks made > on the service which due to its 'write-only' nature makes it impossible

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-02-14

2020-02-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:29 AM Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:56:26PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > ### AAA Replacement > > IMHO this section should be labeled "AAA - Replacement for Fedora > Account System (FAS)" or is this not called AAA but securitas? > > > > This project

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2020-02-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:16 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I've done an early build locally to determine what's needed to make > >

Re: Weekly Backlog Refinement - Week Mar 09 2020

2020-03-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:58 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:47:47PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi! > > > This is the first email with trying to better prioritize our backlog of > > ticket ( https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ). > > Thanks for doing

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:16 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > &g

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2020-03-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:42 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:16 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > &

The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

2020-03-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > ### Other Updates > > GitForge Decision > * After evaluating over 300 user stories from multiple stakeholders we > have aligned on a decision for the Gitforge that CPE will operate for > the coming years. We are opting for Gitlab for ou

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

2020-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:13 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le dimanche 29 mars 2020 à 23:47 -0400, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > As a General User > > > I want to access repos fully over https > > > For environments where SSH is blocked > >

Re: Hello world!

2020-04-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Kirwan wrote: > > Hello all, > > My name is David Kirwan, I'm originally from Kilkenny, Ireland, now living in > Waterford, Ireland. I've recently transferred to the CPE team at Red Hat, > where I'll likely be working on CentOS and Fedora infrastructure in a

Re: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache

2020-04-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:27 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The Fedora kernel is moving to maintaining the package in a source > (sometimes people refer to it as an "exploded") tree. Basically just a > fork of upstream. This makes a lot of packager tasks easier, but has > introduced a min

Re: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache

2020-04-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:55 PM clime wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 00:48, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:27 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > The Fedora kernel is moving to maintaining the pack

Re: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache

2020-04-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 7:17 PM clime wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 01:08, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:55 PM clime wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 00:48, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > >

Packit Pagure support (was: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache)

2020-04-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > > useful to us. There's huge piles of

Re: Packit Pagure support (was: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache)

2020-04-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:55 PM James Cassell wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > > > > >

Re: Packit Pagure support (was: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache)

2020-04-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:55 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > > > >

Re: Backlog prioritization

2020-04-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 11:04 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > * Mirror the ansible git repo on [4]pagure.io > Trouble: Low > Gain: Low > > Since that would not allow PRs I think the gain is quite low, but it also > seems like not much trouble to do it. > We could upgrade the Gain to High if we confi

Re: Backlog prioritization

2020-04-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:03 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > * Mirror the ansible git repo on pagure.io > > > I'd like to set up a mirror on pagure.io that would pull from > > > batcave01. It > > > would mean that PR can't really b

Re: FBR: Allow RHEL8 systems to know about code-ready

2020-04-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:03 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > diff --git a/files/common/rhel8.repo b/files/common/rhel8.repo > index 162848d..9686500 100644 > --- a/files/common/rhel8.repo > +++ b/files/common/rhel8.repo > @@ -25,3 +25,10 @@ > baseurl=https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Allow RHEL8 systems to know about code-ready

2020-04-21 Thread Neal Gompa
Okay then... +1 from me. :) On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:10 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > There were worries it might pull in things we do not want. I am going to let > that be dealt with outside of FBR season. > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:05, Neal Gompa wrote: >> &g

Re: Mirror the ansible repo from pagure in the batcave

2020-04-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:47 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > Kevin and I had a discussion on IRC the other day about mirroring the ansible > repo. > The options we considered are: > - mirroring to pagure > - mirroring from pagure > - using pagure's mirroring feature >

Re: [FBR] fix openshift

2020-04-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in > staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started. > It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve correct

New ipsilon snapshot update submitted for F31+ (Fedora AAA stack)

2020-05-05 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, I've submitted a new snapshot update of Ipsilon for Fedora 31+. * Fedora 31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-42cc028b51 * Fedora 32: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a47230d384 This update is the result of fixes made while working with Stasiek Mich

Re: How to deal with dist-git repository of packages never imported

2020-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:11 PM Mattia Verga wrote: > > I've started to clean up the list of approved review-tickets which were > never closed when I found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564412 > > The package bwping was approved and a git repo created, but it always > have been empty

Re: The future of loopabull

2020-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I know this question has already been raised a few times, but I think we > should > raise it once more: what do we see as future for loopabull? > > It is currently triggered on 4 topics (3 from prod and 1 fro

Re: The future of loopabull

2020-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:31 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 08:30 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > I know this question has al

Re: Staging

2020-06-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings everyone. > > As you hopefully know, we took down our old staging env in phx2 as part > of the datacenter move. Once machines from phx2 are shipped to iad2 and > racked and installed and setup we can look at re-enabling our staging >

Re: What is our technical debt?

2020-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:27 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > Just like every team we have technical debt in our work. > I would like your help to try to define what it is for us. > > So far, I've come up with the following: > - python3 support/migration > - fedora-messa

Re: What is our technical debt?

2020-06-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:15 AM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:50:47AM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 10:34, David Kirwan wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > If we are moving towards openshift/kubernetes backed services, we should > > > probably be

Re: What is our technical debt?

2020-06-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:22 AM Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > > > 20/6/26 11:32(e)an, David Kirwan igorleak idatzi zuen: > > Hi all, > > > > If we are moving towards openshift/kubernetes backed services, we should > > probably be sticking with containers rather than Vagrant. We can use CRC > > [

Re: What is our technical debt?

2020-07-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:57 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 14:46, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 30. 06. 20 v 9:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > > > What are you talking about here? The Fedora release

Re: The state of the planet (the app)

2020-07-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:36 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > Running a personal planet and having upgraded the box running it to a recent > OS > (Fedora in this case), I have found out that the underlying application does > not > support python3. > > To be precise, th

Re: Freeze Break Request: koji update for all builders

2020-08-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:37 PM kevin wrote: > > The koji 1.22.0 update added handling for the '--extra-boot-args' > kickstart option. UNfortunately, this support wasn't working right and > causes all our images specifying such options to fail. > > The good news is that the fix is just a one-liner

Re: Freeze Break Request (Fix 2factor on builders)

2020-08-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:29 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Currently the builders are trying to contact os-node boxes on port 8443 but > that is not where fas-all lives. > > diff --git a/roles/base/templates/iptables/iptables.kojibuilder > b/roles/base/templates/iptables/iptables.kojibuil

Re: FBR: Fix DKIM signing for aws and fedorahosted

2020-09-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:03 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable > b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable > index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644 > --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable > +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable > @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ > *@fed

Re: Freeze break request: update koji to 1.22.1

2020-09-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > koji 1.22.1 just was released. It's a small bugfix only release: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/koji-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/YU5CXXID6VMWMV6EBCFYIHPI5LMHTVHH/ > > https://docs.pagure.org/koji/release_notes/release_no

Re: the state of staging

2020-09-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:32 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > greetings everyone. > > I thought I would send out an email about where we are with staging and > get more input on some things related to that. :) > > Account system / noggin: > > I will let the noggin team report here. I know they have been

Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:52 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each guest > in ansible and via virsh commands. > +1 -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ infrastructur

Re: Freeze break request: pagure.fedoraproject.org

2020-09-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:10 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > We have been wanting to upgrade pagure01 from rhel7 to rhel8 for a > while. Additionally, the disk we have defined for it is getting too > small, so we would need to add space. > > To deal with both issues, I have created a pagu

Re: Fedora packages site down

2020-11-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:30 PM Brendan Early wrote: > > On 11/25/20 12:00 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: > > I can't find anymore the links to the testing instances of the two apps. > > Can anyone re-post them here? > > I don't have testing instances, but it will look similar to this. > > https://mymind

Re: ssh git access to src.fedoraproject.org feedback

2021-03-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, 5:13 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:53:28PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 4) We could add some kind of GSSAPI/Kerberos support to pagure, so > > people could use https and a kerberos ticket. > > What's amount of effort required for this option? Because

Re: ssh git access to src.fedoraproject.org feedback

2021-03-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, 5:13 PM Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:53:28PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >

Re: informal video meeting for infrastructure contributors

2021-05-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 08:30:30AM -0400, Eduard Lucena wrote: > > What if we record this an we put it in the Fedora Project Channel on > > YouTube? > > Well, I am not sure about that. We wanted to just have some casual > conversation and no se

Re: Older Fedora use in infrastructure

2021-05-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 4:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 18:10 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > We have a new bodhi release, we should build the rpms on F34 and move > > these up: > > > > bodhi-backend01.iad2.fedoraproject.org > > bodhi-backend01.stg.iad2.fedoraproject.org

Re: epel-next and MirrorManager

2021-06-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:17 AM Adrian Reber wrote: > > Recently a bug was opened to add additional repositories to > MirrorManager for epel-next. One of the problems with adding new > repository definitions to MirrorManager is that the definitions are part > of the code. For each new/changed repos

Re: Freeze Break Request: debugging sssd on ipsilon

2021-09-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 3:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings everyone. > > We have been having a sporadic issue for a while now where sssd on > ipsilon01 and/or ipsilon02 goes into a error state and starts rejecting > everyone's logins. ;( See https://fedorastatus.org and the ticket on > this.

  1   2   >