How hard is to swap Solr search engine backend to client side JS search?
Are there any fast client side JS search engines?
If no-JS navigation is important, maybe it is possible to add clickable index
for all packages under the search form?
I added CI job for GitHub Pages, but of course it is
On 12/11/20 12:21 AM, Anatoli Babenia wrote:
I've deployed the static website to GitHub Pages at
https://abitrolly.github.io/fedora-packages-static/
The search doesn't work, and there is no index to browse,
so it is not very useful.
If you'd like to see the prototype container with working
Hi.
I've deployed the static website to GitHub Pages at
https://abitrolly.github.io/fedora-packages-static/
The search doesn't work, and there is no index to browse,
so it is not very useful. Looks like the search is supposed
to be Solr, which is not static.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:41:21PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 20:26, Brendan Early wrote:
>
> > On 11/25/20 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > My understanding is that the -static version cannot update at the same
> > > cadence as the content synced out to the mirrors.
I can't find anymore the links to the testing instances of the two apps.
Can anyone re-post them here?
Thanks
Mattia
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 20:26, Brendan Early wrote:
> On 11/25/20 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is that the -static version cannot update at the same
> > cadence as the content synced out to the mirrors. To me, that's a
> > problem, because then the data is just too stale or
On 11/25/20 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
My understanding is that the -static version cannot update at the same
cadence as the content synced out to the mirrors. To me, that's a
problem, because then the data is just too stale or wrong because it's
not fresh enough.
How often do the mirrors
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:30 PM Brendan Early wrote:
>
> On 11/25/20 12:00 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > I can't find anymore the links to the testing instances of the two apps.
> > Can anyone re-post them here?
>
> I don't have testing instances, but it will look similar to this.
>
>
On 11/25/20 12:00 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
I can't find anymore the links to the testing instances of the two apps.
Can anyone re-post them here?
I don't have testing instances, but it will look similar to this.
https://mymindstorm.fedorapeople.org/pkgs-demo/pkgs/numix-icon-theme-square/
You
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 23:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:18:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
> > >
> > > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
> >
> >
Dne 24. 11. 20 v 22:53 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> Miroslav: what do you think?
I am not personally attached to any solution. Whatever has wider consensus work
for me.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:18:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
> >
> > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
>
> Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we
On 11/24/20 5:18 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to deploy?
Timothée and I
Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
>
> see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to deploy?
If that will be the fedora-packages-ng I will be happy
Thanks for the new link.
It may be worth fixing the link from
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#Packages
which is still alive, although many packaging links from that page seem to be
broken, so possibly that page is no longer maintained.
___
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:41:42PM -, Phil Clayton wrote:
> Thanks for the new link.
>
> It may be worth fixing the link from
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#Packages
> which is still alive, although many packaging links from that page seem to be
> broken, so possibly that page is no
For a while now
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/
has been reporting
Service Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance
downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Has this packages site been retired or does a server just need
17 matches
Mail list logo
