re-titled from "Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website"
Sounds good to me. Well, thank you for your trust and confidence. This is the
perfect size of project that can probably be finished while we're waiting for
OSUOSL. I don't expect it will be very much larger than
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 12:22 -0700, brynn wrote:
> If it's as simple as making a "good" or "vetted" tag, and writing
> guidelines, why not get started?
Why not indeed. I trust you wholly with creating a simple set of
guidelines, I think you made a good start in the previous email.
You may wish to
Haha!
> it will bear as much responsibility for tagging tutorials
as 'good' or 'vetted' as there are volunteers to do the vetting.
So when we have a tag for "good" or "vetted" should there be guidelines for
using it? Because what one sees as good will not necessarily be what all
consider good
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 22:35 -0700, brynn wrote:
> It seems to me like the Inkscape website should bear some
> responsibility for providing quality content (even if it's not its
> own content), especially regarding tutorials.
And it will, it will bear as much responsibility for tagging tutorials
as
