[Int-area] 答复: 答复: Is the UDP destination port number resource running out?// re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-gue-04.txt

Hi Tom, > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com] > 发送时间: 2017年5月20日 23:46 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: int-area@ietf.org > 主题: Re: 答复: [Int-area] Is the UDP destination port number resource running > out?// re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-gue-04.txt > > On Fri, May 19, 2017

[Int-area] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: Is the UDP destination port number resource running out?// re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-gue-04.txt

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com] > 发送时间: 2017年5月21日 0:01 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Joe Touch; int-area@ietf.org > 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [Int-area] 答复: Is the UDP destination port number > resource running out?// re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-gue-04.txt > > On Fri,

[Int-area] The INTAREA WG has placed draft-bonica-intarea-eping in state "Adopted by a WG"

The INTAREA WG has placed draft-bonica-intarea-eping in state Adopted by a WG (entered by Wassim Haddad) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-intarea-eping/ ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-06.txt

+1 – I concur with Fred that this draft should become a BCP. The concept of a tunnel as a link is fundamental and should be a foundational principle for how tunnels are designed/specified. Thanks, --David From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L Sent:

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-06.txt

Hi Joe, I read the whole document, and I think is ready for advancement in its current form modulo the Informational -> BCP decision. I support changing the document track from Informational to BCP, with the understanding that more work will be needed in Section 5 if that would be the case.