Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-08.txt

2023-07-26 Thread Donald Eastlake
I believe this revision resolve the comments from the IEEE 802.1 WG in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/mMDG3O8uzezg6I3x_Ee7atuhU0k/ The Shepherd's Write-Up might need some minor tweaks but other than that I believe this document is ready for publication request. Thanks, Donald

[Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-08.txt

2023-07-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group (INTAREA) WG of the IETF. Title : IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters Authors

Re: [Int-area] [Masque] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-26 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Re-, Not sure why using PvD would be “cleaner” vs. what they are doing with PCO IEs. There are plenty proxies that are enabled in cellular networks and being discovered by UEs already (CSCFs, etc.). Cheers, Med De : Tommy Pauly Envoyé : mercredi 26 juillet 2023 09:17 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INN

Re: [Int-area] [Masque] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-26 Thread Tommy Pauly
Indeed, I don’t think 8801 is currently deployed by the carriers, but the target of this document is to have a standard, cross-network way to bootstrap the discovery of these proxies. Using IPv6 RAs and related information to advertise proxies would allow 3GPP to provide this as a clean discove

Re: [Int-area] [Masque] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-26 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 25 juill. 2023 à 23:33, Tommy Pauly a écrit : > > Hi Marc, > > To start — I have no objection to there being some mechanism to discover a > proxy using dns-sd / bonjour! If someone has a good use case for that, that > certainly is a possibility. > > I do think it would be a different u

Re: [Int-area] [Masque] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-26 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Tommy, > - ... on cellular > carrier networks, which is one of the main deployment targets > here. Unless I'm mistaken 8801 is not required/supported in 3GPP specs. Typically, PCO IEs are used there. FWIW, the network already provides the following to a UE (excerpt from 23501): == (0-RTT Co