[Int-area] Concluding call for comment (Was Re: IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol)

:34 PM, Suresh Krishnan mailto:sur...@kaloom.com>> wrote: Hi all, IANA received an IP protocol number allocation request from Jon Maloy mailto:jma...@redhat.com>> for the Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol. I picked up this request as Internet AD as the

[Int-area] IP Protocol number allocation request for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol

Hi all, IANA received an IP protocol number allocation request from Jon Maloy mailto:jma...@redhat.com>> for the Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) protocol. I picked up this request as Internet AD as the registration procedure requires IESG Approval. I had provided the

[Int-area] Considering AD sponsoring draft-lihawi-ancp-protocol-access-extension-03

Hi all, I am considering AD sponsoring the following draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lihawi-ancp-protocol-access-extension-03 that proposes extensions to ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol) that was specified in RFC6320 in order to support PON and some other DSL Technologies including

Re: [Int-area] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> On Jan 22, 2020, at 7:18 PM, Tommy Pauly > wrote: > > > >> On Jan 22, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Adam Roach > > wrote: >> >> Thanks again for the quick turn-around on this. >> >> Using your proposed 2**(Delay + 10) seems to strike an okay balance, if I'm >>

[Int-area] AD Evaluation : draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-08

Hi authors, I found this draft generally well written and easy to read but I would like a couple of things fixed in it before I send it off to IETF Last call. Major * Section 3 "The PvD ID is a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) which MUST belong to the network operator in order to

[Int-area] Wrapping up post IESG evaluation discussions on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile

Hi all, The text changes in version -16 of this draft for the resolution of Alissa Cooper’s DISCUSS position resulted in lively discussion on the mailing list. The authors have made another revision of the draft (version -17) to address the comments raised during this discussion. If you

[Int-area] AD sponsoring draft-thaler-iftype-reg-02

Hi all, I would like to AD sponsor the following draft that provides guidelines for definition of new interface types in the IANA IfType registries https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thaler-iftype-reg-02 If you have any concerns either with the contents of the draft, or about me AD sponsoring

[Int-area] Moving forward with draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile

Hi Joe/Fred T. /Tom, You have brought up some good points and I would really like to get this draft to progress in a timely manner. To help with this, I would greatly appreciate your help to move this along by sending specific change proposals pointing to the text in the draft you want changed

Re: [Int-area] To Pascal Thubert -- Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Handling reviews for draft-bi-savi-wlan

On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hello Jun I think this is a misinterpretation of the mandate. Pointing on IETF work done outside SAVI like RFC-to-be 8505 and AP-ND does not constitute creating a solution yourself. It is in the

Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] Considering AD sponsoring draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

Hi Lorenzo, > On Oct 23, 2018, at 12:05 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > Isn't v6ops a natural fit for this, since it essentially documents an > operational practice that is implemented by real hardware? I did think of it, but the draft is also expected to work with IPv4 and that made me

Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] Considering AD sponsoring draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

as RFC, we should also indicate that with draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd, we (will) have a more robust solution for devices that are willing to announce themselves. Cheers, Pascal From: ipv6 mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Lorenzo Colitti Sent: vendredi 19 octobre 2018 02:07 To: Sur

[Int-area] Considering AD sponsoring draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

Hi all, I am considering AD sponsoring the following draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bi-savi-wlan-15 that describes a source address validation solution for WLAN. If you have any concerns either with the content of the draft, or about me AD sponsoring it please let me know before

Re: [Int-area] Early IPv6 ND Option allocation for draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains

18, at 9:43 AM, Suresh Krishnan <sur...@kaloom.com> wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > I have sent off a request to IANA for this allocation. Will keep you posted > on the progress. > > Regards > Suresh > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:59 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) <ppf

Re: [Int-area] Early IPv6 ND Option allocation for draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains

Hi Pierre, I have sent off a request to IANA for this allocation. Will keep you posted on the progress. Regards Suresh > On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:59 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) > wrote: > > Dear intarea chairs, > > In order to maintain consistency between the different

[Int-area] RFC Editor Note for draft-ietf-intarea-probe-10

Hi all, The IANA evaluation of this document and the resulting codepoint allocation pointed out a potential misunderstanding regarding the desired range of code points (Thanks Amanda and Ron for sorting this out!). It would be nice to fix the IANA considerations text in the document to clarify

Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

Hi Khaled, > On Oct 7, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Hi, > > Seems like you are against the author or the idea or even both, your own > opinion is respected, but don't force someone to do something, He clearly mentioned he is against the idea. He does

[Int-area] IPMix/IPv10 event timeline (was Re: Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10))

Hi Melinda, First of all, I share your sentiments. This mail is a last ditch effort to get this proposal away from intarea (in one of two ways). More details below. > On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:22 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: > > I'm somewhat astonished to see this email - I

[Int-area] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment"

Hi all, The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment” and the deadline for providing inputs is 2018/01/28. The

Re: [Int-area] Request for a mailing list to IPmix I-D.

> On Oct 2, 2017, at 12:38 AM, Melinda Shore wrote: > > On 10/1/17 8:13 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> I have a proposal for the chairs: solicit interest in pursuing the >> topic by asking for prospective subscribers to a mailing list to >> discuss the draft/concept. If

Re: [Int-area] Request for a mailing list to IPmix I-D.

Hi Khaled, > On Sep 29, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Hi Suresh, > > The problem I’m trying to solve is to overcome the depletion of IPv4 address > space and the lack of implementing IPv6 , this will cause the IPv6 only hosts > not to be able to

Re: [Int-area] Request for a mailing list to IPmix I-D.

Hi Khaled, > On Sep 29, 2017, at 6:47 AM, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Hi Suresh, > > As you can see, many people are discussing IPmix through the internet area > WG, so it will be better if we create a mailing list specifically for the > IPmix discussion so we can

Re: [Int-area] IPv10.

Hi Khaled, > On Sep 11, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is IPv10 still not considered on your list of agenda, I think the discussion > phase has passed. > > I would like thank everyone who participated or reviewed the IPv10 I-D, but >

Re: [Int-area] INT AD Office hours ?

Hi Toerless, The INT AD office hours are Thursday 13:30-14:30 at the Paris Room (Lobby Level). Thanks Suresh On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > When & where ? I did not see a mail on the list with that subject nor on the > agenda. Where should i have

[Int-area] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-03

Hi all, I have gone through draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-03 and I found no issues in it other than some outdated references*. I have sent it along to IETF Last Call. Please update these references when you submit a new version (either to address comments from IETF Last Call or IESG

[Int-area] AD sponsoring draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-02

Hi all, I am considering AD sponsoring the following draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/ draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-02 This draft updates RFC6890 that was published as an AD sponsored document through the Internet area. If you have any concerns either with the content of the draft or with me

Re: [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes

Hi Lucy, Fully agree with Juan Carlos's assessment. This is how I was allocating time as well when I was the WG chair. The best way to get your slot earlier in the agenda is to get more discussion on the list *prio*r to the scheduling deadline for the meeting. The chairs use this information

[Int-area] Moving GUE from nvo3 to intarea

Hi all, Alia Atlas and I had a brief chat with the authors of the draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03 and decided that the draft would be a better fit in intarea as it is more widely applicable than just to nvo3. This draft is currently a WG item in nvo3 but I would like the chairs to gauge whether

[Int-area] Conclusion of adoption call (was Re: Call for adoption of draft-baccelli-intarea-adhoc-wireless-com-01.txt)

Hi all, Based on the response during the adoption call we see that there is consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. Authors please resubmit the draft as a working group draft after the submissions reopen. Thanks Suresh & Juan Carlos On 10/13/2015 08:13 PM, Suresh Kris

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-baccelli-intarea-adhoc-wireless-com-01.txt

Hi all, This draft was presented at the intarea face to face meeting in London (IETF89) and has received significant feedback since both at the meeting and on/off list. The authors have published a new revision that they believe addresses the comments and have requested WG adoption of the

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-nordmark-intarea-ippl-00.txt

Hi all, This draft was presented at the intarea face to face meeting in Prague, and the author has requested adoption of the draft. This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of draft-nordmark-intarea-ippl-00.txt as an intarea WG draft. The

[Int-area] Conclusion of adoption call (was Re: Call for adoption of draft-huitema-privsec-harmfulname-01.txt)

Hi all, Based on the support expressed at the Prague meeting and the mailing list we judge that there is consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. Authors please resubmit the draft as a working group draft. Thanks Suresh & Juan Carlos On 09/18/2015 11:25 PM, Suresh Kris

Re: [Int-area] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-welzl-icmp-text-middleboxes-00.txt

Hi Michael, On 06/29/2015 06:35 PM, Michael Welzl wrote: Dear all, We just posted the draft below. Not knowing which other group would fit, we're sending it here. We're really transport people and at least I am newbie to this group... very curious to hear your thoughts: - completely

[Int-area] Fwd: IESG Statement on Internet Draft Authorship

Hi all, Please be aware that the IESG has published the following statement on draft authorship. Thanks Suresh Forwarded Message Subject: IESG Statement on Internet Draft Authorship Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:31:32 -0700 From: The IESG i...@ietf.org Reply-To: i...@ietf.org

Re: [Int-area] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu-04: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Fred, On 05/19/2015 05:07 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: The draft is reliant on discovery of the GMTU, which is through PMTUD procedures. That being the case, the draft needs to tell the conditions under which PMTUD can be relied on. Reliable delivery of PTB messages is one necessary

Re: [Int-area] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu-04: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Ron, On 05/13/2015 11:39 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: Kathleen, AFAIK, most IP stacks include code that detects fragmentation overlap attacks. (Do I have that right?) So, reassembly attacks shouldn't be effective whether reassembly is performed at the GRE egress or the ultimate

[Int-area] List back to normal (was Re: NOTICE: Manual moderation in effect)

Hi all, I have removed the manual moderation flag from the list since the thread in question seems to have cooled off. Thanks Suresh On 05/06/2015 11:27 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi all, I have placed the wg mailing list under manual moderation for now and each message will have

[Int-area] NOTICE: Manual moderation in effect

Hi all, I have placed the wg mailing list under manual moderation for now and each message will have to be approved by the moderators before being posted to the list. This may cause a slight delay in the posting of messages and I apologize in advance for this. Thanks Suresh

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF93 intarea meeting

Hi all, We are issuing this call to estimate how much face to face meeting time we need for the intarea WG at the Prague IETF. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in

Re: [Int-area] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu

Hi Brian, On 04/08/2015 06:18 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: Fred, On 4/8/15 3:30 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: To be constructive, one way forward would be to define a new field in the GRE header called the fragment field. It would be used to fragment the payload packet prior to encapsulating each

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF92 intarea meeting

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Dallas IETF in a short 1 hour slot and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@tools.ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be

Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

Hi Ron, On 02/27/2015 07:13 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: Guys, I would like to suggest that this discussion is beyond the scope of draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. The chairs may correct me, but it might even be outside the scope of this WG. Agree with you that the discussion is out of scope for

Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

Hi Tom, On 02/06/2015 12:25 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Ronald Bonica rbon...@juniper.net wrote: Tom, Good point. I will fix this in the next version of the draft. h Hi Ronald, In section 2.1 of draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-02, making checksum verification

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF91 intarea meeting

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Hawaii IETF and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@tools.ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in the intarea

[Int-area] Conclusion of adoption call for draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

Hi all, We have gone through the responses and we see support for adoption of this draft as a wg document. Authors, please resubmit the draft as draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu-00 Thanks Suresh and Juan Carlos ___ Int-area mailing list

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-02

Hi all, This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and has received a bit of discussion. This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-02 as an intarea WG draft. The draft is available at

[Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06

Hi all, This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and has received a bit of discussion. This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 as an intarea WG draft. The draft is available at

[Int-area] Conclusion of adoption call for draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios

Hi all, We have gone through all the messages and unfortunately we do not see wg consensus for adoption. There have been some issues that were brought forward during the adoption call. It would be great we can continue discussing the draft on the list and try to work on the issues. Thanks

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF90 intarea meeting

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Toronto IETF in a two hour slot and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@tools.ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

Hi Alissa, On 06/19/2014 06:38 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: I guess it is a feature of area WGs that the sequence of work items is not well-defined in advance of taking up any particular work items, nor are those work items correlated to WG milestones (I looked at the intarea milestones, dated to

Re: [Int-area] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers

Hi SM, On 06/17/2014 02:58 PM, S Moonesamy wrote: Hi Suresh, Juan-Carlos, At 07:36 17-06-2014, SHEPPARD, SCOTT wrote: To close this for now. I see no compelling reason to change the BCP RFC 6302. Privacy is important. But equally so is the need to protect our customers, ourselves and the

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF89

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the London IETF (we have been allocated a short one hour slot) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@tools.ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think

[Int-area] Fwd: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas

Hi all, The NomCom is looking for more nominees for the open positions. Please consider volunteering and/or nominating people who you feel are suited for these open positions. Thanks Suresh Original Message Subject: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF88

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Vancouver IETF (we have been allocated a 2.5 hour slot on Monday) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots to intarea-cha...@tools.ietf.org detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-nachum-sarp-06.txt

Hi all, This draft has been presented at several intarea face to face meetings and has received quite a bit of discussion. It has been difficult to gauge whether the wg is interested in this work or not. This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of

[Int-area] Working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01

Hi all, This message starts a two week intarea working group last call on this draft describing the use of IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing as an Informational RFC. The draft is available at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01.txt

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF87

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Berlin IETF (we have been allocated a 2 hour slot on Friday) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in

[Int-area] IETF86 minutes available

Hi all, The draft minutes from the Orlando intarea meeting are now available at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-intarea Please review these minutes and send us changes/additions by April 27, 2013. We would like to thank Stuart Cheshire for taking the minutes. Regards

[Int-area] NAT reveal analysis IETF Last Call comments

Hi all, These comments were received on the IETF discussion list during the IETF last call. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77707.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg77273.html Thanks Suresh Original Message Subject: Re: Last

Re: [Int-area] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis

Hi Brian, On 02/11/2013 07:44 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: Hi Suresh, On 2/11/13 7:08 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. I wanted to clarify three points that you raised and I will ask the authors take care of the rest. On 02/11/2013 04:11 PM, Brian Haberman

Re: [Int-area] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis

Hi Behcet, On 02/12/2013 05:57 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Hi Suresh, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. I wanted to clarify three points that you raised

Re: [Int-area] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis

Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. I wanted to clarify three points that you raised and I will ask the authors take care of the rest. On 02/11/2013 04:11 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: 7. In Section 4.1.2, it would be good to describe any issues that the approach has with the original use of the

[Int-area] Request to advance draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-04.txt

. Personnel: Who is the Document Shepherd? Who is the Responsible Area Director? Suresh Krishnan is the document shepherd. Brian Haberman is the responsible AD. (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready

[Int-area] Adoption of draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02 as wg draft

Hi all, The adoption call on the mailing list has demonstrated consensus to adopt this draft as a wg draft. Authors, please resubmit this draft as draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-00. Regards Suresh Julien ___ Int-area mailing list

Re: [Int-area] IPv6 ND applicability in draft-nachum-sarp-03

Hi Linda, On 11/19/2012 07:11 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: Suresh, -Original Message- Because it is :-). As an example, if you take an fat tree architecture, the number of access switch ports on a subnet is not directly related to the number of ports on the L3 gateway that are on

Re: [Int-area] IPv6 ND applicability in draft-nachum-sarp-03

Hi Linda, On 11/20/2012 01:05 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: Suresh, Are you saying that router has to send out MLD Query for all potential ND multicast addresses and keep up state for listeners for all those multicast addresses? Nope. Only for those solicited node multicast groups that have

Re: [Int-area] IPv6 ND applicability in draft-nachum-sarp-03

Hi Linda, On 11/13/2012 08:43 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: Suresh, Comments are inserted below: -Original Message- Even though that IPv6 ND uses multicast instead broadcast, IPv6 ND does have scalability issues in Data Center when hosts within same subnet are spread across

Re: [Int-area] IPv6 ND applicability in draft-nachum-sarp-03

Hi Linda, On 11/12/2012 05:36 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: Suresh and Julien, When the “draft-nachum-sarp-02” was presented at InterArea WG in 84^th IETF, the feedback was that the draft needs to be updated to include the processing for IPv6. So we updated the draft to include the

[Int-area] Fwd: CORRECTION: Help the NomCom

Please consider providing feedback to the Nomcom. They need the community's feedback to pick good candidates for the open positions. Thanks Suresh Original Message Subject: CORRECTION: Help the NomCom Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:17:22 -0700 From: NomCom Chair

[Int-area] Call for agenda items at IETF85

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting at the Atlanta IETF (we have a 2 hour slot) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in the intarea meeting *

[Int-area] Second working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-04

Hi all, This message starts a two week intarea working group last call on advancing the draft about Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments as an Informational RFC. The editors believe that this version has addressed the issues raised

[Int-area] Minutes from IETF 84 available

Hi all, The minutes from the intarea WG meeting at IETF84 are available on the proceedings site. Thanks to Linda Dunbar for taking the minutes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-intarea.txt If there are any inaccuracies or omissions in the minutes, please let us know by

[Int-area] Completion of working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02

Hi all, After going through the responses to the WGLC, it is clear that the draft is not ready to go forward in the publication process. We will discuss further steps for this draft at the Vancouver meeting. Thanks Suresh Julien ___ Int-area mailing

[Int-area] Call for agenda items

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting in Vancouver (we have requested a 2 hour slot) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in the intarea meeting

[Int-area] ACTION REQUIRED: Extending working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02

call period is extended until Friday July 6, 2012. Thanks Suresh and Julien On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi all, This message starts a two week intarea working group last call on advancing the draft about Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST_ID

Re: [Int-area] New draft about formally obsoleting some historic IPv4 options

, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi all, Here is a new draft about formally obsoleting some IPv4 options that are not being used in practice. The draft is available at Text: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gp-intarea-obsolete-ipv4-options-iana-00.txt HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gp-intarea

[Int-area] New draft about formally obsoleting some historic IPv4 options

Hi all, Here is a new draft about formally obsoleting some IPv4 options that are not being used in practice. The draft is available at Text: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gp-intarea-obsolete-ipv4-options-iana-00.txt HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gp-intarea-obsolete-ipv4-options-iana-00

[Int-area] Working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02

Hi all, This message starts a two week intarea working group last call on advancing the draft about Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments as an Informational RFC. The draft is available at

[Int-area] Minutes from IETF 83 available

Hi all, The minutes from the intarea WG meeting at IETF83 are available on the proceedings site. Thanks to Ole Troan for taking the minutes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-intarea.txt If there are any inaccuracies or omissions in the minutes, please let us know by Friday

[Int-area] Call for agenda items

Hi all, The intarea WG will be meeting in Paris (we have requested a 2 hour slot) and we are in the process of setting the agenda. Please send us your request for slots detailing * Name of the draft * Short description of why you think the item needs to be discussed in the intarea meeting *

[Int-area] Adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis as WG draft

Hi all, There was significant support to adopt this draft as wg item both in the face-to-face meeting in Taipei and on the mailing list. There were some significant privacy concerns raised concerning the draft, and they needed to be addressed. Alissa performed a review and had proposed some text

Re: [Int-area] Call for confirming adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-04 as intarea working group draft

Hi Hannes, On 12/05/2011 09:16 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi Suresh, it would also be useful to state that the scope of the document has been changed with the discussions at the meeting. Without the clarified scope the call for adoption does not make sense (unless you have been at the

[Int-area] Minutes from the intarea wg meeting at IETF82

Hi all, The minutes from the intarea wg meeting at IETF82 are now available at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/minutes/intarea.txt Please take a look and send in any corrections/clarifications as required. Thanks again to Ole Troan for taking the minutes. Regards Julien Suresh

Re: [Int-area] My comments on draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-04 from the meeting

I think part of the confusion surrounding this draft arises because of the apparent discrepancy between the stated goal of the draft and the text currently in the draft. Since some of the solutions being analyzed in the draft have not been proposed in any other draft, it seems natural for this

Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-ietf-intarea-router-alert-considerations-01

Hi Francois, On 10-10-19 12:34 AM, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: * I am not sure that IP PID is a well known term and am certain that it is not defined in RFC791. It does not address IPv6 either. Please define a new term in the terminology that is IP version agnostic. Something like Upper Layer

[Int-area] Review of draft-ietf-intarea-router-alert-considerations-01

Hi Folks, I have read through this draft and I think it is in good shape to go forward. I do have some comments you may like to address * Section 3 * I am not sure that IP PID is a well known term and am certain that it is not defined in RFC791. It does not address IPv6 either. Please define