Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-03-03 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Ramalingam C wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2016 02:00 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: >>> The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock >>> are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions >>> have changed compared to old stepp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-26 Thread Ramalingam C
On Thursday 18 February 2016 02:00 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions have changed compared to old stepping. v2: Fixing compilation warning. v3: Retained the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: >> The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock >> are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions >> have changed compared to old stepping. >> >> v2: Fixing compilation warning. >> v3: Retained the ol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: > The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock > are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions > have changed compared to old stepping. > > v2: Fixing compilation warning. > v3: Retained the old Macros (Jani) > > Signed-off-by: Deepak M Rev

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-15 Thread Deepak M
The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions have changed compared to old stepping. v2: Fixing compilation warning. v3: Retained the old Macros (Jani) Signed-off-by: Deepak M --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 96 +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-04 Thread Deepak, M
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 7:28 PM > To: Deepak, M ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider > form B0 stepping o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-04 Thread Jani Nikula
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider >> form B0 stepping onwards >> >> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: >> > The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock are revised from >> > B0 stepping onwards, the bit defini

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-04 Thread Deepak, M
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 6:29 PM > To: Deepak, M ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Deepak, M > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-04 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016, Deepak M wrote: > The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock > are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions > have changed compared to old stepping. > > v2: Fixing compilation warning. Why did you move and rename everything when it was not needed? BR, J

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Additional MIPI clock divider form B0 stepping onwards

2016-02-02 Thread Deepak M
The MIPI clock calculations for the addtional clock are revised from B0 stepping onwards, the bit definitions have changed compared to old stepping. v2: Fixing compilation warning. Signed-off-by: Deepak M --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 104 +-- driver