Quoting Jani Nikula (2017-12-18 17:37:13)
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Looks good, I'm thinking we might push the drm_printer to the caller of
> > intel_device_info_dump(), but this is already a substantial improvement
>
> Param ordering seems a bit surprising in both patches. T
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2017-12-18 15:51:31)
>> We dump device flags in few places (init_early, debugfs, gpu_error)
>> using different functions. Lets add reusable function to avoid
>> code duplication.
>>
>> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 1
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2017-12-18 15:51:31)
> We dump device flags in few places (init_early, debugfs, gpu_error)
> using different functions. Lets add reusable function to avoid
> code duplication.
>
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 1296/-3572 (-2276)
> Function
We dump device flags in few places (init_early, debugfs, gpu_error)
using different functions. Lets add reusable function to avoid
code duplication.
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 1296/-3572 (-2276)
Function old new delta
intel_device_info_dump_
