On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I don't think it's quite that easy, but I took it as a, "yes." Which one
> is patch 3?
"drm/i915: make semaphore signaller detection more robust" - it was a
follow-up patch in this thread, hence no 3/3. If the relevant bits on
bdw have moved
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:37:12PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:52:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:33:59PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Daniel
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:37:12PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:52:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:33:59PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Daniel Vetter writes:
> > >
> > > > There's an entire pile of issues in here:
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:52:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:33:59PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Daniel Vetter writes:
> >
> > > There's an entire pile of issues in here:
> > >
> > > - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:33:59PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
> > There's an entire pile of issues in here:
> >
> > - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the gtt
> > offset of the batch buffer when a batch is executed. Semaphores are
>
Hi,
Daniel Vetter writes:
> There's an entire pile of issues in here:
>
> - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the gtt
> offset of the batch buffer when a batch is executed. Semaphores are
> always emitted to the main ring, so we always want to look at that.
The ipe
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:31:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> There's an entire pile of issues in here:
> >>
> >> - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD p
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> There's an entire pile of issues in here:
>>
>> - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the gtt
>> offset of the batch buffer when a batch is executed. S
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> There's an entire pile of issues in here:
>
> - Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the gtt
> offset of the batch buffer when a batch is executed. Semaphores are
> always emitted to the main ring, so we al
There's an entire pile of issues in here:
- Use the main RING_HEAD register, not ACTHD. ACTHD points at the gtt
offset of the batch buffer when a batch is executed. Semaphores are
always emitted to the main ring, so we always want to look at that.
- Mask the obtained HEAD pointer with the act
10 matches
Mail list logo