Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-02 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 09:09 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 18:54 +, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 10:32 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 04:44 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:51 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 18:54 +, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 10:32 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 04:44 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:51 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, José Roberto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2018-12-11 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 10:32 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 04:44 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:51 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > > The old debugfs fields was not follow

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2018-12-11 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 04:44 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:51 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it > > > was > > > a bit confusing. > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2018-12-11 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:51 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it > > was > > a bit confusing. > > > > So it went from: > > ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2018-12-10 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was > a bit confusing. > > So it went from: > ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status > Sink_Support: yes > PSR mode: PSR1 > Enabled: yes > Busy front

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2018-12-04 Thread José Roberto de Souza
The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was a bit confusing. So it went from: ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status Sink_Support: yes PSR mode: PSR1 Enabled: yes Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x000 Main link in standby mode: no HW Enabled & Active bit: yes Sour