Re: [Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

2010-12-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:14:53 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com wrote: Chris, just notice you removed pipe control notify entirely on -next, that seems wrong to me. In Ironlake time, we've seen interrupt stall issue with user interrupt, and be warned user interrupt is deprecated, so

Re: [Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

2010-12-15 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.12.15 10:05:01 +, Chris Wilson wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:14:53 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com wrote: Chris, just notice you removed pipe control notify entirely on -next, that seems wrong to me. In Ironlake time, we've seen interrupt stall issue with user

Re: [Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

2010-12-15 Thread Fu Michael
On 2010/12/16 9:59, Zhenyu Wang wrote: On 2010.12.15 10:05:01 +, Chris Wilson wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:14:53 +0800, Zhenyu Wangzhen...@linux.intel.com wrote: Chris, just notice you removed pipe control notify entirely on -next, that seems wrong to me. In Ironlake time, we've seen

[Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

2010-12-14 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Chris, just notice you removed pipe control notify entirely on -next, that seems wrong to me. In Ironlake time, we've seen interrupt stall issue with user interrupt, and be warned user interrupt is deprecated, so we moved on to use pipe control notify, although there's a workaround later covered

Re: [Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

2010-12-14 Thread Shuang He
Yeah, I also met this issue, and bisection point to this as well :) 32402 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402 19:05:15 cri hig ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk shuang...@intel.com NEW [piketon -next bisected] Many tests make GPU hang and reset Thanks --Shuang On