Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 22:50, Jason H wrote: > What is the "web" you speak of? LOL It's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWW ;-) > Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue. However I > have to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall web development. > We were approachi

Re: [Interest] QNetworkAccessManager in a command line, non-eventloop application

-Original Message- From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:27 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] QNetworkAccessMan

Re: [Interest] QNetworkAccessManager in a command line, non-eventloop application

On sexta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2013 00.59.13, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > I have a command line application, with no event loop. We can stop here. QNetworkAccessManager requires an event loop. But if you're going to block anyway in order to do work, you can use QEventLoop to start the event loop

[Interest] QNetworkAccessManager in a command line, non-eventloop application

I have a command line application, with no event loop. I also have a function where I need the tool to send a HTML request out, and not care about the result.. There is 1 and only 1 QNAM. I know what the issue is, there is NO event loop, what I would like to do is have a QThread (or a concurre

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On 01/17/2013 10:58 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > On Thu, January 17, 2013 09:46:30 Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 01/17/2013 03:55 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: >>> On Thu, January 17, 2013 13:52:06 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 01/15/2013 03:43

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On 01/17/2013 01:37 PM, qtnext wrote: > 2013/1/17 Thomas Senyk > > On Thu, January 17, 2013 09:46:30 Eric Nelson wrote: > > On 01/17/2013 03:55 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > > > If you want a straight, simple, pixel- and color-perfect > video-playe

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Jason H wrote: > > Wt on the other hand, is C++ and takes care of all of that for you. You can > provide a CSS, but you don't have to. It doesn't matter if tomorrow the web > ditches HTML for XML or pure javascript, or ditches MIME headers for JSON > ones. The tool

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

Hello, Me being the Debian maintaner for Wt, +1 (I think I was the first one to ever mention Wt in this list and in Planet KDE/Qt :-) ) On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Bob Hood wrote: > +1 > > On 1/17/2013 1:50 PM, Jason H wrote: > > What is the "web" you speak of? LOL > > Anyway, that [ze

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

+1 On 1/17/2013 1:50 PM, Jason H wrote: > What is the "web" you speak of? LOL > > Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue. However I have > to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall web development. We were > approaching something really good with Java and .NET, but th

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

What is the "web" you speak of? LOL Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue. However I have to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall web development. We were approaching something really good with Java and .NET, but these got sidelined by a handful of easy-to-imple

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

2013/1/17 Thomas Senyk > On Thu, January 17, 2013 09:46:30 Eric Nelson wrote: > > On 01/17/2013 03:55 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > > > On Thu, January 17, 2013 13:52:06 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson > > >> > > >> wrote: > > >>> On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtn

Re: [Interest] touch functionality not working with my Qt 5 apps

I think I've figured out what I need to do to get the touch functionality to work. I believe I need to download the Tslib sources, cross-compile them for arm, then build qtbase/src/plugins/generic/tslib plugin, and put that plugin on the BeagleBoard-xM. Then, I think I need to use the  -plugin

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On Thu, January 17, 2013 09:46:30 Eric Nelson wrote: > On 01/17/2013 03:55 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > > On Thu, January 17, 2013 13:52:06 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtnext wrote: > thanks for the info

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On 01/16/2013 03:05 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > On Tue, January 15, 2013 15:52:48 Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtnext wrote: >>> thanks for the info ... I hopes that with I.MX6 it's possible to decode >>> HD video in hardware and for example remap to an opengl texture or >>> quick2 i

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On 01/17/2013 03:55 AM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > On Thu, January 17, 2013 13:52:06 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson >> >> wrote: >>> On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtnext wrote: thanks for the info ... I hopes that with I.MX6 it's possible to decode HD video in

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 17.01.2013, 19:38, "Nikos Chantziaras" : >> On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras >> > wrote: >>> >>> I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x,

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

17.01.2013, 19:38, "Nikos Chantziaras" : > On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > >>  On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras >  > wrote: >> >>  I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc.  Would you run those >>  on the server?  Sure yo

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras > wrote: > > I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those > on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client instead >

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those > on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client instead > has enormous benefits. Having to download 10MB of JS is a small price > to pay. If that re

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 17:17, Yves Bailly wrote: > Le 17/01/2013 16:10, Nikos Chantziaras a écrit : >> I don't have customers. Why does everybody assume that *everything* out >> there is developed on a commercial basis? Have you people never used a >> piece of software that is development by someone on thei

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

Le 17/01/2013 16:10, Nikos Chantziaras a écrit : > I don't have customers. Why does everybody assume that *everything* out > there is developed on a commercial basis? Have you people never used a > piece of software that is development by someone on their spare time and > provided for free? Let'

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

I don't have customers. Why does everybody assume that *everything* out there is developed on a commercial basis? Have you people never used a piece of software that is development by someone on their spare time and provided for free? On 17/01/13 17:03, Jason H wrote: > This is where you set

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 17.01.2013, 18:40, "Nikos Chantziaras" : >> On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote: >> >>> You all are doing it wrong!!! >> >> >> >>> If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly >>> translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

This is where you set up a server and charge for the service. Or fins a sponsor. Or advertise. If you aren't popular, AWS has a free tier now too. I use hub.org which has VPSs and some affordable plans. They also donante to PostgreSQL. They even donated a VM for a free/OSS project I have. (Though

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 16:53, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 17.01.2013, 18:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" : >> On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >>> 17.01.2013, 18:40, "Nikos Chantziaras" : On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote: > You all are doing it wrong!!! > If you wan

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

Without knowing his application, I can say that Wt is a joy, and it is compiled server code. It isn't Qt though, but damn close. I did a project to blend Qt and Wt, mostly by hacking MOC to take IU files and create files for Wt usign Wt class names. It worked 100%. Where I fell over though was p

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

17.01.2013, 18:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" : > On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  17.01.2013, 18:40, "Nikos Chantziaras" : >>>  On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:    You all are doing it wrong!!! >>>      If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly >>

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

Le 17/01/2013 15:31, Jason H a écrit : > You all are doing it wrong!!! > > I've been researching this a week or so. Emcripten is not going to work. You > do not want your binary > transalted to JS. The demos are slow, and regardless of optimization will > always be slow. 4MB of > compressed javas

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

17.01.2013, 18:40, "Nikos Chantziaras" : > On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote: > >>  You all are doing it wrong!!! > > > >>  If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly >>  translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML to WebGL. > > I'm not even using OpenGL.  There's nothing to

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote: > You all are doing it wrong!!! > If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly > translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML to WebGL. I'm not even using OpenGL. There's nothing to translate. There's about 3000 lines of code that are GUI-

Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

You all are doing it wrong!!! I've been researching this a week or so. Emcripten is not going to work. You do not want your binary transalted to JS. The demos are slow, and regardless of optimization will always be slow. 4MB of compressed javascript for a program? Not with the bandwidth we hav

Re: [Interest] clang 3.2, -Wunused-private-field and qtestspontaneevent.h

17.01.2013, 15:52, "Jan Kundrát" : > On Thursday, 17 January 2013 12:15:45 CEST, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>  or just add Q_UNUSED(posted), Q_UNUSED(m_accept), >>  Q_UNUSED(reserved) to the implementation of some method. > > Thanks, filed as https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,45071 > >>

[Interest] Re: clang 3.2, -Wunused-private-field and qtestspontaneevent.h

On Thursday, 17 January 2013 12:15:45 CEST, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > or just add Q_UNUSED(posted), Q_UNUSED(m_accept), > Q_UNUSED(reserved) to the implementation of some method. Thanks, filed as https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,45071 > Use -isystem instead of -I for Qt headers. Cool

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

> > They concept is to use the GPU-buffer (maybe a FBO) as a texture > (that's how it's done on the desktop and other embedded HW) > > That why you can use the video in the same matter as any other item in your > SceneGraph (e.g. transform, translate, shadereffect, mapping on 3D-items,) > > ...

Re: [Interest] clang 3.2, -Wunused-private-field and qtestspontaneevent.h

17.01.2013, 14:24, "Jan Kundrát" : > Hi, > I've upgraded to clang 3.2 from 3.0 and am getting these build warnings when > using -Wall -Wextra: > > In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtTest/QTest:1: > In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtTest/qtest.h:252: > In file included from /usr/incl

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On Thu, January 17, 2013 13:52:06 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson > > wrote: > > On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtnext wrote: > >> thanks for the info ... I hopes that with I.MX6 it's possible to decode > >> HD video in hardware and for example remap to an opengl tex

[Interest] clang 3.2, -Wunused-private-field and qtestspontaneevent.h

Hi, I've upgraded to clang 3.2 from 3.0 and am getting these build warnings when using -Wall -Wextra: In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtTest/QTest:1:

Re: [Interest] I.MX6 and QT5

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 01/15/2013 03:43 PM, qtnext wrote: >> thanks for the info ... I hopes that with I.MX6 it's possible to decode >> HD video in hardware and for example remap to an opengl texture or >> quick2 item , but I have checked on freescale website and