Re: [Interest] CLion + Qt?

Hello, You might want to check these out (if you don’t already know it) (And possibly vote) if you read the comments in (I think it was the type renderers or qt-project file support one) there was some useful info https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-274

[Interest] QML onActivated reason always 3

Hi, I’m toying with QtQuick and QML for a few days and found that the reason is always 3 no matter how I click the icon in the following code; import QtQuick 2.9 import QtQuick.Controls 2.2 import QtQuick.Window 2.2 import Qt.labs.platform 1.0 Window { id: root visible: true width:

Re: [Interest] QFile fails on Windows when screen is locked with message "device not open"?

ject.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest I’m seing it on console, it outputs this message on its own. I’ll try to investigate it further when I have time. Thank you all. Best Regards, Emre Besirik ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] QFile fails on Windows when screen is locked with message "device not open"?

> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:39, Thiago Apperantly wrote: > > On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 03:26:41 PST Emre Besirik wrote: >> Hello list, >> QFile fails on Windows when screen is locked with message "device not open”? >> And it is on new QFile(“somefile.txt”) not on

[Interest] QFile fails on Windows when screen is locked with message "device not open"?

ed to act like this recently (in all windows version that I tested — 7, 8, 10) Does any one knows a workaround? Or can you tell me why suddenly it started to act like this? is that because of an update or its a Qt change? Best Regards, Emre Be

[Interest] Partial message support in QWebSocket?

Hi all, I was wondering if QWebSocket does support partial messages and if there is anything special to do to enable etc? (Qt is on Client side, talks with java wss server) thanks Regards. ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.

Re: [Interest] QtSharp, the C# bindings for Qt, reach beta status

Thank you Dimitar. Regards/Saygilar, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com > On 12 Jun 2016, at 03:26, Dimitar Dobrev via Interest > wrote: > > Hello all, > > My name is Dimitar Dobrev, I develop C# language bindings for Qt. Today's > release contains bindings for all Qt modules (except QML-only

Re: [Interest] Is there a mirror for the Qt online documentation?

> On 10 Apr 2016, at 20:41, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > On 10/04/16 19:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On domingo, 10 de abril de 2016 14:02:25 PDT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> http://doc.qt.io is down. Are there any mirrors for this? I was not able >>> to find anything with my google-fu. >> >>

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 06 Apr 2016, at 12:18, André Somers wrote: >> >> What I’m trying to say is; non of us here are a UI/UX expert, right? > > I would not make such assumptions out of hand... Do you know who is > subscribed here, and who is working on QtC? Well yes I can not know for sure but I’m betting on

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

>> it only searches for filenames > > Utter nonsense. Well ok even it does not do it as good as JB products I’ll accept this but watch the video link I’ve sent if you had time, you’ll then see what I actually mean > >> You only offer mostly workarounds which are not the same. debugging value

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

>> I do not always use the same mail client and even though I try to clean up >> things, as I am a simply human, I may forget to do somethings occasionally. >> And about the top-posting; thats really an argument belong to entirely >> different thread on its own. don’t get me started on the anti-to

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> In other words, CLion is eons behind Qt Creator in Qt support. no definetly not saying that, at least not yet ofcourse, I’m saying is as an IDE CLion is a better IDE. I’m not using CLion for my Qt dev, I still am using QtC, its just I’m craving for UI/UX and some other things from the likes o

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:29, Reinhardt Behm wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:03:35 NoMercy wrote: >> >> And people keep saying that it is open source, you do it, why don't you do >> it etc. well it maybe open source but I think Qt company is payed well >> considering the license costs, why

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> 4) It's just brain-dead to suggest using a non-Qt ide for Qt. Qt is the > perfect framework for writing an IDE, irrespective of the language > you're aiming for :) JetBrains stuff is only performant in the expense > of a huge memory footprint and relatively longer startup time. This is > of cour

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 17:08, Guenter Schwann wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 04:19:42 PM NoMercy wrote: >> That QtCreator is eons behind current technology and trends, isn't it very >> obvious? > > No! Absolutely not. > QtCreator is a really great IDE. Very lightweight, but still very powe

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:41, André Somers wrote: > > > > Op 05/04/2016 om 15:28 schreef NoMercy: >> Check out the bug report link in first mail. >> >> > So, start contributing to CLion... Why do you need Creator to be effectively > dumped for that? > > André I’m really thinking about it a

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:39, Sean Harmer wrote: > > ps No need to forward everybody's replies to the list. They are cc'd to you > as > well as to the list. I didn’t forward anythink? I know how mailing lists work ;) I just accidentally double posted one of mail own mails and told someone to a

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:41, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >> Well there must be something can be done, Qt Can use Intellij like google >> did, I know its a little bit more work compared to CLion fork but it is >> possible. > > A liitle bit? > > That would mean porting of all clang code model

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:55, Jean-Michaël Celerier > wrote: > > Class implementations > > As somebody wrote already, this refactoring already exists. > > While debugging the values of variables are displayed inside the text editor, > in light gray > > You can hover the variables and see the

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:18, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > > 04.04.2016, 15:13, "Emre Besirik" : >>> * XML tags completion for known tags. This can be done for *.UI files, and >>> maybe some part of *.QS. Basic XML structure is already know - so e

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Sorry forgot to mention this was meant for Alexey Rusakov :) Regards, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com > On 04 Apr 2016, at 13:59, Emre Besirik wrote: > > BTW I think you are replying to the person instead of list address. > list can not see your replies if you dont send it

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> XML tags completion for known tags. This can be done for *.UI files, and > maybe some part of *.QS. Basic XML structure is already know - so even for > unknown XML variants - the IDE knows what tag to close. > Class implementations - for example, I derive from an interface and pressing > cont

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

> XML tags completion for known tags. This can be done for *.UI files, and > maybe some part of *.QS. Basic XML structure is already know - so even for > unknown XML variants - the IDE knows what tag to close. > Class implementations - for example, I derive from an interface and pressing > cont

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

BTW I think you are replying to the person instead of list address. list can not see your replies if you dont send it to the list. Regards, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com > On 04 Apr 2016, at 13:47, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > On 04/04/16 13:29, Alexey Rusakov wrote: >> I don't know what I'm

[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Hello list, I know its a little bit off-topic but I was wondering your ideas about the unpleasentness of coding with QtCreator (no offense, I respect the creators of the original IDE but..) So there is this; https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-318

Re: [Interest] Example SSL Server based on Qt...

There is already a http(s) server written with/for qt in case you missed it on google… http://www.stefanfrings.de/qtwebapp/index-en.html Regards/Saygilar, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com > On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:16, BRM via Interest wrote: >

Re: [Interest] High DPI support in QT (Windows)

Well, I also hope for some imrovement on this subject as I’ve been there too with 5.3 I think… > On 21 Sep 2015, at 18:36, Adam Light wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Pavlo Dyachenko > wrote: > Hi QT team, I posted a question on the forum about high D

[Interest] qt5 + mavericks + xcode 5.0.2 = problem?

with no luck :( any help appriciated, thanks Regards --  Emre Besirik Sent with Airmail___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest