n"
> > To: "Jason H"
> > Cc: "Interests Qt"
> > Subject: RE: [Interest] Let's talk about the upcoming Camera breakage in
> 5.4.2
> >
> > Jason makes some good points:
> >
> > 1. Developers trying to use Q
ibute to the Project’s
success"?
Thanks.
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> From: "Michael R Nelson"
> To: "Jason H"
> Cc: "Interests Qt"
> Subject: RE: [Interest] Let's talk about the upcoming Camera breakage in 5.4.2
>
>
st-bounces+mnelson=sutron@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jason H
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:49 AM
To: Jason H
Cc: Interests Qt
Subject: Re: [Interest] Let's talk about the upcoming Camera breakage in 5.4.2
I've just confirmed via Commercial support that the changes cannot be handled
a
are so many mobile fixes in the x.x.Y
> releases, I have a hard time believing that is the case.
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM
> > From: "Gunnar Sletta"
> > To: "Jason H"
> > Cc: "Interests Qt"
> > Subject: Re: [I
t; wrong, I'll back off. But since there are so many mobile fixes in the x.x.Y
> releases, I have a hard time believing that is the case.
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM
>> From: "Gunnar Sletta"
>> To: "Jason H"
>> Cc: "Interes
ot;
> To: "Jason H"
> Cc: "Interests Qt"
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Let's talk about the upcoming Camera breakage in 5.4.2
>
> I’m sorry you are hit by this, but the idea was that people coming from 5.3
> to 5.4 would not suffer regressions and neither people m
I’m sorry you are hit by this, but the idea was that people coming from 5.3 to
5.4 would not suffer regressions and neither people moving from 4.8, 5.0, 5.1,
5.2 and 5.3 -> 5.5 or from 5.4 LTS to 5.5 or 5.6 or any other 5.6+ which
already had workarounds in place which would have now been broken
43 AM
To: Interests Qt
Subject: [Interest] Let's talk about the upcoming Camera breakage in 5.4.2
I wanted to open this discussion up to anyone who is using a Camera, who has
working code in 5.4.1.
Brief backstory:
At 5.4.1 introduced a fix that is is being removed in 5.4.2, because it is
I wanted to open this discussion up to anyone who is using a Camera, who has
working code in 5.4.1.
Brief backstory:
At 5.4.1 introduced a fix that is is being removed in 5.4.2, because it is
considered a "behavior" change and not a bug fix. I think this categorization
is wrong, and I'm going
