Hi,
I noticed that the php.net windows binaries for php 4.3.4 are compiled
against a newer version of the token table then is in the source tarball
for php 4.3.4. If you compile php 4.3.4 by hand a T_INLINE_HTML returns
308 where as the windows binary from php.net will return 309.
This causes
- Puvodní zpráva -
Od: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Komu: "Christian Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ing.Martin Prásek" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Kopie: "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Odesláno: 21. prosince 2003 22:33
Predmet: Re: [PHP-DEV] Extending PHP with sand
Dick Van Der Kaaden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the php.net windows binaries for php 4.3.4 are compiled
> against a newer version of the token table then is in the source tarball
> for php 4.3.4. If you compile php 4.3.4 by hand a T_INLINE_HTML returns
> 308 where as the windows binary from
Thanks for the patch. Please check out the latest CVS and see if it's OK.
Andi
At 09:51 PM 12/20/2003 +0100, Jakub Vrana wrote:
I am sending a patch with some corrections to PHP man-page.
Jakub Vrana
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
> Thanks for the patch. Please check out the latest CVS and see if it's OK.
Perfect. Thanks for commit.
Jakub Vrana
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Has anyone who's played with the tokenizer lately checked if this patch is OK?
Andi
At 11:14 AM 12/22/2003 +0100, Jakub Vrana wrote:
Hello!
Some characters (like [, ], {, } and backslash sequences) in double
quote strings are highlighted as keywords even on places where they
don't have any speci
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > Why not make the default catch-all as E_ALL and add to the documentation
> > that the new E_STRICT option needs to be turned on explicitly?
>
> Just using E_ALL would match error_reporting where the default E_ALL
> does not
Hi there!
I have beta 3 running on my win98 machine. I tried to use tidy functions and
php returns a "Fatal error: Call to undefined function"...
Then I assumed that I had to uncomment the extension on php.ini, but there
is no line for tidy extension, although the tidy extension is in its dir
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:29:03 -0200
Felipe Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I have beta 3 running on my win98 machine. I tried to use tidy
> functions and php returns a "Fatal error: Call to undefined
> function"...
>
> Then I assumed that I had to uncomment the extension on php
Derick Rethans wrote:
I would like to see E_STRICT added by default otherwise things start out
getting way too complex.
As mentioned here on the list I added E_STRICT to the patch two days
ago, now I'm curious if someone with karma will apply it ;-)
- Chris
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
At 01:46 PM 12/23/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
I would like to see E_STRICT added by default otherwise things start out
getting way too complex.
As mentioned here on the list I added E_STRICT to the patch two days ago,
now I'm curious if someone with karma will appl
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I disagree with Derick and I thought we agreed that the default would
stay E_ALL and not E_ALL|E_STRICT.
Oh, I misunderstood you comment then.
I don't really have an opinion on E_ALL vs. E_ALL|E_STRICT, as soon as
you and Derick sort it out I'll adapt my patch (or you can mak
On Tuesday, Dec 23, 2003, at 13:54 Europe/Copenhagen, Andi Gutmans
wrote:
At 01:46 PM 12/23/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
I would like to see E_STRICT added by default otherwise things start
out
getting way too complex.
As mentioned here on the list I added E_STRIC
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I disagree with Derick and I thought we agreed that the default would stay
> E_ALL and not E_ALL|E_STRICT.
I missed your point, why do you want this?
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:04:41 +0100
Edin Kadribasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it was clearly agreed that for the sake of PEAR and others
> E_STRICT should not be a part of E_ALL. Derick's probably getting too
> old to remember things correctly :)
A countless agreement here :). Obviously for
At 02:07 PM 12/23/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I disagree with Derick and I thought we agreed that the default would stay
> E_ALL and not E_ALL|E_STRICT.
I missed your point, why do you want this?
a) BC
b) Because we agreed that E_STRICT is only fo
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Yes it was clearly agreed that for the sake of PEAR and others E_STRICT
> should not be a part of E_ALL. Derick's probably getting too old to
> remember things correctly :)
Uhm? This is not what we were talking about Edin.
Derick
--
PHP Internals -
Hi,
I usually have to work with dates and i miss a date format character
wich returns year of the week. I'm not a C developer, i could just play
with it in datetime.c, but i send the patch file, please check this and
if you are interest in it, use in the future.
About the working:
in case 01/01/2
Em 23 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye escreveu:
>On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:29:03 -0200
>Felipe Lopes wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I have beta 3 running on my win98 machine. I tried to use tidy
>> functions and php returns a "Fatal error: Call to undefined
>> function"...
>>
>> Then I assumed tha
Although we bundled tidy we did not make it enabled by default,
and AFAIK, it was not added to the default windows build so
I don't think that we currently have an official working php_tidy.dll
for PHP 5. This is something that will probably be turning up in
the windows snapshots on snaps.php.net o
It seems I was misinformed; php_tidy.dll *is* in B3, so it
sounds like you are just not loading it correctly.
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Felipe Lopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:53 PM
Subjec
Em 23 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong escreveu:
>It seems I was misinformed; php_tidy.dll *is* in B3, so it
>sounds like you are just not loading it correctly.
>
>--Wez.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Wez Furlong"
>To: "Felipe Lopes"
>Cc:
>Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:53 PM
>Subjec
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:00:06 +0300
Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm going to rename functions from oci8 to match the naming-conventions.
> Old names will be kept as aliases, of course, but should be deprecated.
> Imho these changes will make OCI extsension more handy an
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 13:38, Andrew Johnstone wrote:
> PHP 5.0 Beta 3 rc 1
>
> new Reflection_Method('','') causes apache2 on windows to crash
Works fine w/ cli:
$ ./sapi/cli/php -r 'var_dump(new Reflection_Method("", ""));'
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'reflection_exception' with message
'C
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 16:05, Hans Lellelid wrote:
> Hi -
>
> We're using the Reflection API in a project for which I'm lead developer.
> Seems to be something changed between beta-2 and beta-3. We're now
> getting the following exception when calling getClass() on a class hint:
[...]
Works fine
> On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 16:05, Hans Lellelid wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> We're using the Reflection API in a project for which I'm lead
>> developer.
>> Seems to be something changed between beta-2 and beta-3. We're now
>> getting the following exception when calling getClass() on a class hint:
> [...]
>
Maybe some more information about how my code files are layed out
may be helpful.
/home/mfischer/htdocs/php5/test.php
This is my test script which is executed via apache.
It includes the file 'Database/MySQL.php'.
/home/mfischer/php/Database/MySQL.php
Inc
I havn't looked at your patch yet, but does this differ in any way from
strftime('%G') ?
-Sara
"Bányai Zsolt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I usually have to work with dates and i miss a date format character
> wich returns year of the week. I'm not a C dev
28 matches
Mail list logo
