Since I did not like the text of the announcement that much, I wrote
the following:
We are happy and proud to announce the first Release Candidate for the
eagerly awaited first release, PHP 5.0.0, of PHP 5. More than two years
in the making, PHP 5 is the next "major release" in the su
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:25:06AM -0500, Adam Bregenzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 18:02, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> > A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for developers using MySQL 4.1 and
> > later. Additionally to a functional interface this new extension also
> > includes an object-oriented
In a message dated 3/19/2004 1:25:23 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 18:02, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for developers using MySQL 4.1 and
> later. Additionally to a functional interface this new extension also
> includes
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 18:02, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for developers using MySQL 4.1 and
> later. Additionally to a functional interface this new extension also
> includes an object-oriented interface and support for many of MySQL's
> new features such as prepa
Thanks. I commited a fix but it'll take some time to update.
Andi
At 09:02 AM 3/19/2004 +1000, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for developers using MySQL 4.1 and
later. Additionally to a functional interface this new extension also
includes an object-oriented interface
What else does debug_print_backtrace() include? If the info is more maybe
we should change debug_backtrace()?
In any case, in general I don't have a problem to do this. Might be nicer
if we could do it without output buffering though but I haven't looked at
the code to see how hard that would be
A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for developers using MySQL 4.1 and
later. Additionally to a functional interface this new extension also
includes an object-oriented interface*d* and support for many of MySQL's
new features such as prepared statements.
A new MySQL extension named MySQLi for d
Hi internals,
what do you think about adding an optional parameter to debug_print_backtrace() (PHP 5
only) so instead of printing the stacktrace to get it as string. The information provided
by debug_print_backtrace() is more than the information provided by debug_backtrace().
So if the paramete
The much overdue 4.3.5RC4 is finally out and hopefully will shortly (within a
week) be followed by the final release. In the meantime please download this
release, which is avaliable from http://qa.php.net/ and try it with against
your code as well as "make test".
While I do not anticipate any
The PHP development team is proud to announce the release of PHP 5 Release
Candidate 1.
Some of the key features of PHP 5 include:
- The Zend Engine II with a new object model and dozens of new features.
- XML support has been completely redone in PHP 5, all extensions are now
focused around the
On 2004/03/18, at 16:04, Tadashi Jokagi wrote:
Hi,
Haruki Setoyama's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My purpose is translation of the PEAR manual into Japanese, and
mentemance of it.
I did Japanese translation of PEAR manual with Mr. Jokagi since last
year. and he suggest to me that I should apply t
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Andrey Hristov wrote:
> a small licensing question. Is it only forbidden to have extensions in PECL that
> link to GPL or it's not possible at all to have PHP extensions (even not hosted
> in PECL) that link to GPL code , and there is no exception in the license of
> the code (
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, BDKR wrote:
> I take it that some of you have also received an email from
> "management". This seems extremely fishy and just
> wanted to make sure I'm correct.
This is some lame-ass tricky virus. Feel free to delete / ignore it.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Devel
I take it that some of you have also received an email from
"management". This seems extremely fishy and just
wanted to make sure I'm correct.
Here is the body of the message.
Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content)
outgoing from your e-mail account. Prob
Hello user of Php.net e-mail server,
Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content)
outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by
a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer safe,
follow the instructions.
Pay attention
Hi,
a small licensing question. Is it only forbidden to have extensions in PECL that
link to GPL or it's not possible at all to have PHP extensions (even not hosted
in PECL) that link to GPL code , and there is no exception in the license of
the code (like with mysql).
Andrey
--
PHP Internals -
Dear PHP community,
We are two French students.
We study computer sciences at the "Universite Louis Pasteur" of Strasbourg.
During our fourth year, we had to create a project.
We chose to develop an extension for the PHP community.
"att_codec" is the name of our extension. It is written in C langu
Checking the Subject's here, PHP5 activity seems to be very low.
So, I assume there is a dedicated place somewhere else for PHP5
beta testing.
But where, please? (I haven't found any clues either in the README*
files along the sources, or by a 1-minute scanning of php.net.)
(Also strange, that th
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:59:40 +0200 (IST), Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Why would anyone need this? if __construct() contains php5-only
> syntax, it won't work anyway on php4.
I just image the case of a class with some optimizations
for php5, but with a fallback implementation of some of its
feature
Why would anyone need this? if __construct() contains php5-only syntax, it
won't work anyway on php4. If it contains something that works in php4 -
why do you need separate constructor? Anyway, since in no place besides
constructor you can not do such tricks - why constructors should be the
onl
OK done
At 09:21 AM 3/18/2004 +0100, Lorenzo Alberton wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:10:42 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Well it doesn't really make sense to redefine a constructor. We
> added it on purpose. Do you want me to change it to E_STRICT?
if that is possible, yes, please.
The example below
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:10:42 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Well it doesn't really make sense to redefine a constructor. We
> added it on purpose. Do you want me to change it to E_STRICT?
if that is possible, yes, please.
The example below should make it clear
why redefinig a constructor *could* ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
