Lester Caine wrote:
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
of the things already available in the native driver, but the second
you do that they become incompatible, so in addition to the PDO
driver you need to also
Hello Jani,
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
marcus
Monday, August 6, 2007, 3:57:26 PM, you wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the
Yes, I know about this. I was wondering about this thing long time
ago..just never got around doing anything about it.. :D
But let's wait for PHP 5.3 branch to get opened first.
--Jani
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 14:22 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Jani,
David has a point here. So first
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and
Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
--Jani
Johannes Schlüter kirjoitti:
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 19:13 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
Well David's plan is to use the implementation for PHP-level getopt()
and I can imagine doing crazy stuff, so if we can make it thread-safe in
a good
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
initially the idea was to use getopt on windows machines. After proposing
my patch which just includes the NetBSD getopt(), there was a
recommandation in php.pecl to use the php_getopt instead of the system
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:02 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
of the things already available in the native driver, but the second
you do that they become
Larry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
of the things already available in the native driver, but the second
you do that they
On 08/08/07, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
of the things already
12 matches
Mail list logo
