On 10/08/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My perception is that when people talk about namespaces they usually
mean logical separation of things in, well, naming space, and when they
talk packages they usually mean files on disk and putting things into
files and finding which
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (630 total including feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
42165 Open fsockopen ssl Operation now in progress (115)
hello again,
so now i have the test results :) (I dont have an ppc mac, so i ask
an friend)
And it dosn't work!
When i configure it on an intel mac, the WORDS_BIDENDIAN macro will
never definied.
But i need to define this macro when the compiler runs the ppc-compile.
I think the code
On 13.08.2007 14:09, Christian Speich wrote:
hello again,
so now i have the test results :) (I dont have an ppc mac, so i ask
an friend)
As far as I know, GCC on PPC is unable to generate universal binaries, so I
don't understand what exactly you were testing there..
And it dosn't work!
Stanislav Malyshev skrev:
And they, btw, are not ashamed of calling it namespaces just because
it's not c++ ;)
Exactly. That was my main point. And, as I said,ECMAScript 4 will most
probably be the main other language for most ordinary PHP developers,
not Java and certainly not C.
On 8/13/07, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev skrev:
And they, btw, are not ashamed of calling it namespaces just because
it's not c++ ;)
Exactly. That was my main point. And, as I said,ECMAScript 4 will most
probably be the main other language for most ordinary PHP
On Monday 13 August 2007, Tijnema wrote:
On 8/13/07, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev skrev:
And they, btw, are not ashamed of calling it namespaces just because
it's not c++ ;)
Exactly. That was my main point. And, as I said,ECMAScript 4 will most
probably be
On 13/08/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since JavaScript (or ECMAScript) doesn't have namespaces, people that
hear the name namespace for php will either don't know what it is, or
think that it's the same as the C implementation.
Tijnema
I don't know what namespaces look like in other
On 8/13/07, Larry Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007, Tijnema wrote:
On 8/13/07, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev skrev:
And they, btw, are not ashamed of calling it namespaces just because
it's not c++ ;)
Exactly. That was my main
It isn't C++-like namespaces and it isn't Java-like packages. So it
doesn't really matters what name will be used. It will confuse
newcomers from any language anyway.
I came to PHP from C++ and I find my self confused from time to time
even though I code in PHP for a few years now. There are
Tijnema skrev:
Since JavaScript (or ECMAScript) doesn't have namespaces, people that
hear the name namespace for php will either don't know what it is, or
think that it's the same as the C implementation.
ECMAScript 3 aka JavaScript 1.x does not have NS.
ECMAScript 4 aka JavaScript 2 will
Was there something wrong with the patch or what?
Reverting without _discussing_ is not very nice..
--Jani
Stanislav Malyshev kirjoitti:
stasMon Aug 13 21:16:57 2007 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_2)
/ZendEngine2 zend_language_parser.y
Log:
Revert
Was there something wrong with the patch or what?
Yes, it was major syntax change in minor version. These belong to
5.3/HEAD, as many others of like nature do.
Reverting without _discussing_ is not very nice..
It was discussed and I also confirmed it with the release manager (Ilia).
--
Jani,
Dmitry asked that the patch be reverted and I agreed with him. Since
the author didn't have time (I am guessing), I've asked Stas to
revert the patch. The reason being that this change is too major to
commit at the very last minute in the release cycle. The code will go
back into
The two pages for reference.
http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/chapter_11_packages.html
http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/chapter_12_namespaces.html
The spec's quite nice, although a bit of a nightmare to implement in
parts ;) -
From what I've seen, and I've not been keeping up with
Then this needs to be clear in the NEWS file as this is in RC1...
-Hannes
On 8/14/07, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jani,
Dmitry asked that the patch be reverted and I agreed with him. Since
the author didn't have time (I am guessing), I've asked Stas to
revert the patch. The
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (57 total including feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
26771 Suspended register_tick_funtions crash under threaded webservers
27372 Verified parse error
On 8/13/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was there something wrong with the patch or what?
Yes, it was major syntax change in minor version.
A Major bugfix maybe ( yes, it was clearly a bug/misfeature)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
A Major bugfix maybe ( yes, it was clearly a bug/misfeature)
A bug is when code doesn't do what was intended. This is not the case,
this is the case of missing feature. While I think everybody agrees this
feature is good to us, it's not the time to add it. We lived for years
without it, we
19 matches
Mail list logo
