Here is a patch I am submitting as a recommendation to implement a
setcookie2() function to support the Set-Cookie2 response header defined
in RFC 2965.
RFC 2965 obsoletes the original Netscape cookie specification and RFC
2109. Unfortunately, the only major browser I can find that implements
Here is a patch I am submitting as a recommendation to implement a
setcookie2() function to support the Set-Cookie2 response header defined
in RFC 2965.
I think setcookie2 can ve useful, but a function with 13 arguments is a
monster. Especially that you may not use all of them. Maybe it's
On 8/25/07 4:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Here is a patch I am submitting as a recommendation to implement a
setcookie2() function to support the Set-Cookie2 response header
defined in RFC 2965.
I think setcookie2 can ve useful, but a function with 13 arguments is a
monster. Especially
On Thu, August 23, 2007 5:52 pm, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
define_ns('FOOBAR', $value);
Can be, but there's two downsides:
1. define_ns would be weird construct - it would be combined
function/operator
2. operators with underscores look bad...
At the risk of starting another packages versus
On Wed, August 22, 2007 8:03 am, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
You can have const outside namespaces but they are not real
compile-time
constants.
They are set during execution in the same way as define() does.
?php
const DIR = dirname(__FILE__);
echo DIR;
?
You do realize this is going to
On Tue, August 21, 2007 1:22 am, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Before we continue this discussion I think there are a couple of
things
which would be useful data points:
a) What is the performance difference between an implicit Unicode
app
and non-Unicode. If we have 3-4 apps
On Tue, August 21, 2007 5:21 pm, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
So if you don't deal with them, you'd just say we don't run on PHP
6.
Is it better than saying we run on PHP 6 only with that specific
setting?
Yes, it is better, imho.
--
Some people have a gift link here.
Know what I want?
I want
I think we should rename flex to something else because you just
confused me with that new Adobe not-quite-flash flex thingie...
:-) :-) ;-)
Just Kidding!!!
(Not about the confusing me part, as we all know that's trivial...)
On Mon, August 20, 2007 5:04 am, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello
