On 10/9/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09.10.2007 06:32, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > I will use an example:
> >
> > $foo = substr($bar, 0, 5) . "-" . substr($bar, 5);
> >
> > or
> >
> > $foo = $bar[:5] . "-" . $bar[5:];
> >
> > I would argue that the second line is hardly more cry
On 09.10.2007 06:32, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> I will use an example:
>
> $foo = substr($bar, 0, 5) . "-" . substr($bar, 5);
>
> or
>
> $foo = $bar[:5] . "-" . $bar[5:];
>
> I would argue that the second line is hardly more cryptic than the
> first one.
How come?
It looks like you're reading
I will use an example:
$foo = substr($bar, 0, 5) . "-" . substr($bar, 5);
or
$foo = $bar[:5] . "-" . $bar[5:];
I would argue that the second line is hardly more cryptic than the
first one. And if we were concerned that concerned about duplicate
functionality, we probably wouldn't have Simp
So what? Just because other languages implemented a good idea first
does not mean that it is verboten to us. PHP is result of years of
evolution (and yes, Terry, it's also a ball of nails) and stealing
ideas is one way to inject fresh genes into it.
-Andrei
On Oct 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Mar
On 10/8/07, Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> by the way, 33487 is not really a bug if it is stated this way.
> the proper bug description for 33487 would be:
> "there is no mechanism in zend_object_storage to free unused memory
> during script execution"
Yeah, it fixes the issue in t
On 10/8/07, Tony Bibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the untrained eye, would this then fix these bugs?
>
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33595
yes
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33487
no
by the way, 33487 is not really a bug if it is stated this way.
the proper bug description for 33487 wo
For the untrained eye, would this then fix these bugs?
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33595
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33487
--Tony
- Original Message
From: David Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 2:12:31 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Referen
Thanks David.
We'll start testing the patch in our labs right after we're done with the
Zend/PHP conference (early next week).
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:13 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-D
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (60 total including feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
26771 Suspended register_tick_funtions crash under threaded webservers
===
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (626 total including feature requests)
===[*Programming Data Structures]=
40496 Assigned Test bug35239.phpt still fails (works in PHP 5)
=
2007/10/8, David Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey all,
>
> Now that macros for manipulating refcount and is_ref have been implemented,
> I'm ready to submit patches for the GC. I know you all have been waiting for
> this for a long time ☺.
Good, I will test you patches as soon I have time to.
>
Hey all,
Now that macros for manipulating refcount and is_ref have been implemented, I’m
ready to submit patches for the GC. I know you all have been waiting for this
for a long time ☺.
I have made two sets of patches, one for HEAD and one for PHP_5_3 (note that I
had to rearrange the order of
12 matches
Mail list logo
