Re: [PHP-DEV] Large file support for PHP

2007-10-17 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
but this wouldn't be any different from any other api/abi bump. furthermore, Of course. If there are two different PHP versions with different API numbers, it's OK. What's less OK is when there's two PHP builds with same API numbers which are binary incompatible. in the context of running d

[PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread jean jayet
Hi folks working at Sun Microsystems QA org we are integrating php into our new Open Solaris release (php 5.2.4 for now) we have run the functional test suite shipped within the php release to address/assess non regression testing area similarly we have run the php 5.2.4 test suite vs a Red Hat

Re: [PHP-DEV] Method overloading by method signature

2007-10-17 Thread Richard Quadling
On 17/10/2007, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > suit fully fitted) "catch-up". (Hey when has documentation EVER been > > ahead of the game!?!). > > Always? Otherwise there would be no need for documentation, if > everything was in the code. Some people even start with writing docs

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, jean jayet wrote: > we would like to know whether at php org level there are any test > results available / published / shared per OS (like Solaris, RH in > particular) Not grouped, but we do have all the test results here: http://news.php.net/php.qa regards, Derick -- Der

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, jean jayet wrote: > i have the following naive question : how can get a reference of test > results > > smth to be able to find : > > such set of test case id MUST pass > such set test case id MUST fail > such set test case id skip if such extension missing etc,... Well, th

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread jean jayet
Hi Derick many thks for the pointer going thru this link, there are hundreds of reports posted !!! can not go thru all of them most of the reports opened are for Linux didn't find any dedicated to Solaris (but for sure assuming they exist) parsing results, tests failed may vary (even if notici

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread jean jayet
> Well, they should all pass as catching 50 failed tests for php 5.2.4 / 5.11 for failed tests can someone tell the action to take ? - report a new bug at php org level for this php release ? - integration problem specific to OS (eg implementation specifities) ? - other ? rgds, Jean Derick R

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread Zoe Slattery
Derick Rethans wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, jean jayet wrote: i have the following naive question : how can get a reference of test results smth to be able to find : such set of test case id MUST pass such set test case id MUST fail such set test case id skip if such extension missing etc,.

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 17.10.2007 18:05, jean jayet wrote: >> Well, they should all pass > > as catching 50 failed tests for php 5.2.4 / 5.11 > > for failed tests can someone tell the action to take ? Figure out the reason and act accordingly. If it's a problem caused by some Solaris-specific behaviour and we're mi

[PHP-DEV] exception policy for core

2007-10-17 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
Hi, I remember that we discussed the question of exception throwing from core in the very early days of php 5, when the suggestion of turning all errors into exceptions first came up. I remember that we decided that exceptions should only be thrown from core on constructor errors by defau

Re: [PHP-DEV] exception policy for core

2007-10-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I remember that we discussed the question of exception throwing from core in > the very early days of php 5, when the suggestion of turning all errors into > exceptions first came up. I remember that we decided that exceptions should > only

Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE

2007-10-17 Thread Sebastian Nohn
Are there already any results on these checks? - Sebastian On 10/2/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course not (and I know we use import in a few places in ZF) which is why I > want to see whether it makes sense to allow reserved words. The basic parsing > rule would be easy but

Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE

2007-10-17 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Are there already any results on these checks? Looks like we have the simple patch that allows to use "import" as method name, function name and class name. If we didn't discover any problems with it then import stays. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.2.4 test results reference

2007-10-17 Thread Nuno Lopes
we would like to know whether at php org level there are any test results available / published / shared per OS (like Solaris, RH in particular) Not grouped, but we do have all the test results here: http://news.php.net/php.qa In addition to what Derick said, there is a "reference" build and t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Large file support for PHP

2007-10-17 Thread sean finney
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 09:13:03 am Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Of course. If there are two different PHP versions with different API > numbers, it's OK. What's less OK is when there's two PHP builds with > same API numbers which are binary incompatible. right. > > in the context of running

Re: [PHP-DEV] My musings on... a Solaris test platform

2007-10-17 Thread Nuno Lopes
It would be interesting, yes. My university has been discontinuing the Solaris servers and now I only have access to an ancient Solaris 7 server. Even more interesting would be to get your patches to fix those bugs :) Thanks, Nuno - Original Message - From: "Rob Thompson" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [PHP-DEV] Object arithmetic

2007-10-17 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
While looking at bug 42780: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42780 The only way not to lose precision is to explicitly cast the object to float or string, which just doesn't seem right to me. I'm not sure how this can be fixed - there should be some type used and many objects won't provide conve

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: james

2007-10-17 Thread James McGlinn
Assisting with maintenance of the documentation starting with user notes, and eventually editing of the manual itself. I have subscribed to the relevant mailing lists & introduced myself, and Philip Olson has confirmed I should apply for CVS access here. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm

Re: [PHP-DEV] Object arithmetic

2007-10-17 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On 10/18/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While looking at bug 42780: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42780 > > The only way not to lose precision is to explicitly cast the object to > > float or string, which just doesn't seem right to me. > > I'm not sure how this can be fixed

RE: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE

2007-10-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
Main problem I have right now after digging deeper is that any such "fix" in the parser will mean that tokenizers and syntax highlighters will not treat keywords like "import" correctly. Fixing this would require them to do parsing which in many cases you don't want to do. There are a lot of uti

Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE

2007-10-17 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On 10/18/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Main problem I have right now after digging deeper is that any such "fix" in > the parser will mean that tokenizers and syntax highlighters will not treat > keywords like "import" correctly. Fixing this would require them to do > parsing whi