On 21.12.2007 06:35, sungyun wrote:
> Developing the PHP runtime
> Translating the documentation
Usually we don't give CVS accounts right away.
It's recommended to start with sending patches to the appropriate lists.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Lis
Am 20.12.2007 um 23:43 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
On 20.12.2007, at 20:54, David Zülke wrote:
Am 20.12.2007 um 19:25 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
So maybe enlighten me what the purpose of the CLA is.
The purpose is that a project/company/whoever has written
confirmation that the developer
On 21.12.2007 05:15, Martin Alterisio wrote:
>> http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/packages/popa3d/popa3d/md5/
>>
>> Tried that one and it is about 30% faster indeed (on md5-only benchmark,
>> 32-bit Linux on AMD Opteron. Anybody objects to accepting this?
>>
>>
> Just one, but is a mere
isn't "public domain" specific enough?
On 12/21/07, Martin Alterisio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/12/20, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Attached is a quick patch for PHP 5.2.5 that replaces RSA's copyrighted
> > > implementation of MD5 with my public domain one:
> > >
> > >
Greg Beaver schreef:
> Martin Alterisio wrote:
>> Consider the following code:
>>
>> foo.php:
>> > class test {
>> public static function foo() { echo "I'm foo in class test\n"; }
>> public static function foo2() { self::foo(); }
>> }
>> ?>
>>
>> foo2.php:
>> > namespace test;
>> function foo()
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
isn't "public domain" specific enough?
Public Domain actually isn't a universal concept, and it isn't
recognized everywhere in law. A very open BSD style license first,
followed by granting it to the public domain, should cover all bases.
Even somewhere that doesn't re
Hello Solar,
thanks again for offering this. What we require is to have the PHP License
in the code. If you are fine with this we will gladly replace the existing
code with yours. You can of course put more header information in there to
stress out further that it is your code and where it can b
On 21.12.2007, at 10:08, David Zülke wrote:
I wonder why they need such elaborate bla bla to just say so
trivial things. The copyright part seems irrelevant given your
assessment and the patent clause seems overly complex if all they
are saying that any patents that are infringed upon by
No, public domain isn't recognized by copyright law as a copyright notice.
An extra line should be added that says something like "no copyright is
claimed", and attach a year range where the copyright is in effect (since
copyright expires, if I remember correctly). Anyway, the keyword here is
"copy
Fix a few bugs, in the documentation, and in the longer run helping out with
the core.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Not entirely correct. As I pointed out in the other thread, not all
countries have the concept of transferrable copyright. Therefor, a
note should be added that explicitly states that everyone is free to
use it without permission, fees etc. Much like a BSD or MIT license,
but without the ad
Would someone be willing to apply the patch the Wez emailed in? That would
at least enable me to upgrade to the latest version of php once it is in a
released version.
I'd still love to get a fix for bug #36561 [PDO_ODBC/MSSQL does not work
with bound params in subquery], anyone interested? Name a
Sounds to me like we should stop accepting this legal BS. Then they will
only be able to pay for a nice little house if they write understandable
stuff or nothing is they are unwilling to adapt to the demands of their
customers.
It is quite impossible to write anything understandable for the p
Thanks! I didn't know about that.
2007/12/21, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Not entirely correct. As I pointed out in the other thread, not all
> countries have the concept of transferrable copyright. Therefor, a
> note should be added that explicitly states that everyone is free to
> use i
On Dec 21, 2007 7:38 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only thing needed for this is willingness to actually listen.
Listen the masses: NO, we don't want CLAs in php.net, period.
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm
Has anyone tried refactoring a "real world" application/library to use
namespaces?
I've been pondering about how to algorithmically/mechanically prepare a non
namespaced code for namespaces appliance. This would be a first step which
will just prepare the code for namespaces in a safe way, but not
Hi Martin,
On Dec 21, 2007 8:30 PM, Martin Alterisio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been pondering about how to algorithmically/mechanically prepare a non
> namespaced code for namespaces appliance. This would be a first step which
> will just prepare the code for namespaces in a safe way, but
On Dec 21, 2007 9:55 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Only thing needed for this is willingness to actually listen.
> >
> > Listen the masses: NO, we don't want CLAs in php.net, period.
>
> I like when people call themselves "masses", it is amusing.
I don't know how much answ
2007/12/21, Paul Biggar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 8:30 PM, Martin Alterisio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been pondering about how to algorithmically/mechanically prepare a
> non
> > namespaced code for namespaces appliance. This would be a first step
> which
> >
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:14:02 +0100, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007 9:55 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Only thing needed for this is willingness to actually listen.
>> >
>> > Listen the masses: NO, we don't want CLAs in php.net, period.
>>
>> I like
20 matches
Mail list logo
