Hi Greg,
Please look at the stream wrappers in include_path patch I posted last
week.
I went to try this, but the patch doesn't apply to 5_3 any more since the
re2c change. Could you post an updated version please?
Thanks,
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
T
Hi,
Please look at the stream wrappers in include_path patch I posted last week.
Thanks,
Greg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Could I just get a confirmation that the parent forwarding patch has
been looked at? It seems to me that the patch makes parent:: work as
one would expect when extending static methods, and would not cause
any backwards compatibility problems. Why is add a function preferred?
Thanks,
Joseph North
Okay. I'm fine with the patch.
Stephen Bach wrote:
Sorry for the ambiguity. Allow me to clarify: I meant that U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP
and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST should work the same as the other error modes.
Otherwise, what's the point of having them?
-Stephen
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:02:36 pm Geof
To answer Stanislav's question yes, the forward_static_call patch will
suffice my concerns with the current implementation. You did mention that
you weren't a big fan of the name, I am not particularly attached to it
either. If you (or anyone else) has better name in mind I would be happy to
chang
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Cristian Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/19, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Another alternative would be to simply bundle CMake with PHP,
>
> Nope, Cmake is available in almost all distributions and in the case
> some of them dont have
hi everyone,
sorry for digging up this dead horse...
On Thursday 10 January 2008 01:05:35 pm Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:03:02PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > It's a bit of a maintenance headache for distributions when
> > > packages
2008/3/19, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Another alternative would be to simply bundle CMake with PHP,
Nope, Cmake is available in almost all distributions and in the case
some of them dont have it yet, they will because sooner or later will
need to integrate KDE4.
Please dont bundle mo
I'd be in favor of this idea because it sounds cool, but it has some
crippling drawbacks:
- There isn't really a "homogenous" way to build PHP without OS-
specific checks. There's just too much that even the most minimal
build needs to know about its host system.
- "configure.php" wouldn't
Actually, it should behave like with flex: only rebuild when it is
necessary (due to the file being touched).
This _is_ behaving like flex under doze!
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I hope it must be fixed now.
Dmitry.
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Dmitry,
can you please fix your mail client? You are breaking every single thread
you reply to. Thx!
marcus
Monday, March 17, 2008, 9:07:41 AM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL P
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
>
> > 1. If re2c IS found, try to rebuild the .c versions
> > 2. If re2C is NOT found, use the .c versions in cvs
> > - this allows not making re2c required but letting pe
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
> 1. If re2c IS found, try to rebuild the .c versions
> 2. If re2C is NOT found, use the .c versions in cvs
> - this allows not making re2c required but letting people who do have
> it get properly generated files every time
Actually, it should behav
With regard to the CMake SoC proposal ...
I may be a little naive here but surely it would be better to use PHP
to build PHP?
I know that outside of PHP, a LOT of tools which I have no knowledge
of (I'm a windows user. I use point and click interfaces to build apps
when I used Delphi - no need fo
Hello Dmitry,
can you please fix your mail client? You are breaking every single thread
you reply to. Thx!
marcus
Monday, March 17, 2008, 9:07:41 AM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:24 PM
>> To:
Hello Stanislav,
since when does building PHP on windows require anything of Cygwin?
In fact those are two completely different platforms. Not that PHP and re2c
wouldn't both support both. However I do not see a reason to require re2c
after all when finding a way around the -g switch. That is we
16 matches
Mail list logo