Re: [PHP-DEV] REMINDER - stream wrappers in include_path

2008-03-20 Thread Steph Fox
Hi Greg, Please look at the stream wrappers in include_path patch I posted last week. I went to try this, but the patch doesn't apply to 5_3 any more since the re2c change. Could you post an updated version please? Thanks, - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List T

[PHP-DEV] REMINDER - stream wrappers in include_path

2008-03-20 Thread Gregory Beaver
Hi, Please look at the stream wrappers in include_path patch I posted last week. Thanks, Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] LSB - new patches for forward_static_call and parent:: forwarding (was: 5.3 Release Planning)

2008-03-20 Thread Joseph North
Could I just get a confirmation that the parent forwarding patch has been looked at? It seems to me that the patch makes parent:: work as one would expect when extending static methods, and would not cause any backwards compatibility problems. Why is add a function preferred? Thanks, Joseph North

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Bug 43477 - Unicode error mode ignored

2008-03-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Okay. I'm fine with the patch. Stephen Bach wrote: Sorry for the ambiguity. Allow me to clarify: I meant that U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST should work the same as the other error modes. Otherwise, what's the point of having them? -Stephen On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:02:36 pm Geof

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] LSB - new patches for forward_static_call and parent:: forwarding (was: 5.3 Release Planning)

2008-03-20 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
To answer Stanislav's question yes, the forward_static_call patch will suffice my concerns with the current implementation. You did mention that you weren't a big fan of the name, I am not particularly attached to it either. If you (or anyone else) has better name in mind I would be happy to chang

Re: [PHP-DEV] CMake SoC Proposal

2008-03-20 Thread Pierre Joye
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Cristian Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/3/19, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Another alternative would be to simply bundle CMake with PHP, > > Nope, Cmake is available in almost all distributions and in the case > some of them dont have

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] date/timelib: use system timezone database

2008-03-20 Thread sean finney
hi everyone, sorry for digging up this dead horse... On Thursday 10 January 2008 01:05:35 pm Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:03:02PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Joe Orton wrote: > > > It's a bit of a maintenance headache for distributions when > > > packages

Re: [PHP-DEV] CMake SoC Proposal

2008-03-20 Thread Cristian Rodriguez
2008/3/19, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Another alternative would be to simply bundle CMake with PHP, Nope, Cmake is available in almost all distributions and in the case some of them dont have it yet, they will because sooner or later will need to integrate KDE4. Please dont bundle mo

Re: [PHP-DEV] Could PHP be used to build PHP?

2008-03-20 Thread Gwynne Raskind
I'd be in favor of this idea because it sounds cool, but it has some crippling drawbacks: - There isn't really a "homogenous" way to build PHP without OS- specific checks. There's just too much that even the most minimal build needs to know about its host system. - "configure.php" wouldn't

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /win32/build config.w32

2008-03-20 Thread Steph Fox
Actually, it should behave like with flex: only rebuild when it is necessary (due to the file being touched). This _is_ behaving like flex under doze! - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for opcode caches

2008-03-20 Thread Dmitry Stogov
I hope it must be fixed now. Dmitry. Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Dmitry, can you please fix your mail client? You are breaking every single thread you reply to. Thx! marcus Monday, March 17, 2008, 9:07:41 AM, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /win32/build config.w32

2008-03-20 Thread Pierre Joye
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Elizabeth M Smith wrote: > > > 1. If re2c IS found, try to rebuild the .c versions > > 2. If re2C is NOT found, use the .c versions in cvs > > - this allows not making re2c required but letting pe

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /win32/build config.w32

2008-03-20 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Elizabeth M Smith wrote: > 1. If re2c IS found, try to rebuild the .c versions > 2. If re2C is NOT found, use the .c versions in cvs > - this allows not making re2c required but letting people who do have > it get properly generated files every time Actually, it should behav

[PHP-DEV] Could PHP be used to build PHP?

2008-03-20 Thread Richard Quadling
With regard to the CMake SoC proposal ... I may be a little naive here but surely it would be better to use PHP to build PHP? I know that outside of PHP, a LOT of tools which I have no knowledge of (I'm a windows user. I use point and click interfaces to build apps when I used Delphi - no need fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for opcode caches

2008-03-20 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Dmitry, can you please fix your mail client? You are breaking every single thread you reply to. Thx! marcus Monday, March 17, 2008, 9:07:41 AM, you wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:24 PM >> To:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /win32/build config.w32

2008-03-20 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, since when does building PHP on windows require anything of Cygwin? In fact those are two completely different platforms. Not that PHP and re2c wouldn't both support both. However I do not see a reason to require re2c after all when finding a way around the -g switch. That is we