Hello All,
I just want to bring in a different perception on the proposed
feature. I think people are very focused on what I call "library
code". This is the kind of code that should in theory be worked on
less, than the glue code that you write in every project to finish up
the applicati
+1 for strict types.
That way it will be simple:
* Don't need - then don't use at all
* You need it - you use it fully.
One thing than left to clearfy - do we allow to hint only part of args or do
we go the road "if hint args, then hint them all!" (I'm personaly for second
one - be strict)
2008/4/18, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I just want to bring in a different perception on the proposed feature. I
> think people are very focused on what I call "library code". This is the
> kind of code that should in theory be worked on less, than the glue code
> that
Hi all...
I am developing a PHP extension and I must confess that my C skills
are not all that great. Is there anyone out there who would be able
to lend a hand? The extension is very simple, it's only four
functions and the whole thing comes to just over 300 lines of C. It's
pretty much comple
Hi Matt,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Matt Parlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be willing to make it worth your while - perhaps if you had an
> Amazon wishlist (or similar), I could help out that way.
>
> Please reply privately if you can help me out.
If it is open source, you ma
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suddenly I need to ensure that all my variables have the proper types. So
> what will people do?
>
> So maybe an "(int)" here or there
> is not so much more code to type, but you can already see that code you safe
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is open source, you may consider to publish the code and ask for
> help or advices in the PECL developer list or here. If it is not,
> well, there is little hope to get any help :)
I'm planning on open-sourcing it,
On 18/04/2008, Arvids Godjuks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for strict types.
>
> That way it will be simple:
> * Don't need - then don't use at all
> * You need it - you use it fully.
>
> One thing than left to clearfy - do we allow to hint only part of args or do
> we go the road "if hint
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 12:33 +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 18/04/2008, Arvids Godjuks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for strict types.
> >
> > That way it will be simple:
> > * Don't need - then don't use at all
> > * You need it - you use it fully.
> >
> > One thing than left to clearf
Em Sex, 2008-04-18 às 10:22 +0300, Arvids Godjuks escreveu:
> +1 for strict types.
>
> That way it will be simple:
> * Don't need - then don't use at all
> * You need it - you use it fully.
>
> One thing than left to clearfy - do we allow to hint only part of args
> or do we go the road "if hint
Hi all,
I changed things so that the many "built-in" constants (CONST_PERSISTENT
ones) will be replaced at compile-time, saving the FETCH_CONSTANT opcode, if
these changes are usable. This was added for TRUE/FALSE/NULL 2 years ago,
but seems like it can be done for "lots" of others too.
Since th
Recently, my pear package has been accepted.
So please give me the CVS account.
Package: Services_Yahoo_JP
My proposal is here.
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=545
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I had a question about object instantiation.
You can do this:
function createObject() {
return new myObject;
}
$result = createObject() -> myMethod();
But you can't do this:
$result = new myObject -> myMethod();
Is there a technical reaosn as to why this can't be done? If not can
this
Hey Internals
I've been wondering for quite some time why PHP doesn't allow you to access
arrays when you assign it to a value like in Javascript:
function ArrayTest(Array $range)
{
return($range);
}
$range = Array(1337 => Array('Hello World'));
echo ArrayTest($range)[1337};
I would
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:40 -0700, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hey Internals
>
> I've been wondering for quite some time why PHP doesn't allow you to access
> arrays when you assign it to a value like in Javascript:
>
> function ArrayTest(Array $range)
> {
> return($range);
> }
>
> $rang
Hi!
$result = new myObject -> myMethod();
Is there a technical reason as to why this can't be done? If not can
this be changed?
I think this can not be parsed unambiguously. This could be new
(expression with ->) or (new expression)->expression. E.g., what this means:
$a = new $foo->bar();
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:42 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > $result = new myObject -> myMethod();
> >
> > Is there a technical reason as to why this can't be done? If not can
> > this be changed?
>
> I think this can not be parsed unambiguously. This could be new
> (expression with
Back in Jan/Feb of 2007 I raised the issue of including
the pecl fileinfo package into 5.3 and 6.0.
This idea was mostly regarded as a good idea as PHP lacks
any method of checking file types, aside from checking the
file extension.
The lack of checking is, I feel, a major oversite in the package
This should really be fixed similar to the iconv //IGNORE flag - so
that bad characters are just replaced with '?'
We use it to render spam email summaries, and dont really care if the
encoding is incorrect, just as long as it shows something.
Throwing a warning without having a fix/workarou
2008/4/18, Sam Barrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:40 -0700, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> > Hey Internals
> >
> > I've been wondering for quite some time why PHP doesn't allow you to
> access
> > arrays when you assign it to a value like in Javascript:
> >
> > function ArrayTe
20 matches
Mail list logo
