On 22 February 2010 17:19, Jani Taskinen jani.taski...@iki.fi wrote:
22.2.2010 17:28, Richard Quadling wrote:
A couple of low level things
Nitpicking, are we? :D
It's what I'm good at ;-)
1 - Can/should the PHP Versions include release candidates?
Yes, they're outdated. This is one part
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
What exactly are you trying to fix here?
gcc 4.4's optimiser removes the overflow check present in
php_filter_parse_int and ZEND_HANDLE_NUMERIC (but I can't touch that part of
the code anyway...) which prevents the
The third release candidates for PHP 5.3.2 was just released for testing
and can be downloaded here:
http://downloads.php.net/johannes/php-5.3.2RC3.tar.bz2
MD5 (php-5.3.2RC3.tar.bz2) = 7d9a716e5c18763572f214dcac216be0
http://downloads.php.net/johannes/php-5.3.2RC3.tar.gz
MD5 (php-5.3.2RC3.tar.gz)
Hi!
My question is not so much about implementation it is about language. I
have noticed quite a few times now that PHP developers use the word
closure when I would prefer lambda.
Everybody on the internet knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of
knowledge, and it says:
In computer
This is not entirely correct, you are right. There's a difference
between anonymous function and closure, though in practice in PHP
anonymous functions are closures (though some of them are rather trivial
ones with no variables to close over) and that's now the only way to
do closure in PHP (i.e.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Ionut G. Stan wrote:
** namespaced functions don't make any difference, as variables aren't
namespaced.
I never did understand *why* variables were not namespaced.
However, since 5.3 has been out for a while it might make things difficult to
make
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 05:00:28 pm Ionut G. Stan wrote:
This is not entirely correct, you are right. There's a difference
between anonymous function and closure, though in practice in PHP
anonymous functions are closures (though some of them are rather trivial
ones with no variables
Hi!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but given the fact that PHP only* supports
functions defined in the global space**, with the additional ability to
import global variables using the global statement, wouldn't that make
named functions able to close-over global variables?
It's different mechanism.
Hi!
I never did understand *why* variables were not namespaced.
If you have so many global vars you need to namespace them, you should
not use global vars.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
s...@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: s...@zend.com
--
PHP
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
My question is not so much about implementation it is about language. I
have noticed quite a few times now that PHP developers use the word
closure when I would prefer lambda.
Everybody on the internet knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source
of knowledge,
10 matches
Mail list logo
