On 7/13/10 11:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Sorry but if the same webserver binary is running php5 with the same vhosts
on the same machine and only one php-version does funny things why
does anybody start a foolish discussion where the problem is?
Could you please drop it. That bug was found
Am 14.07.2010 08:58, schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf:
On 7/13/10 11:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Sorry but if the same webserver binary is running php5 with the same vhosts
on the same machine and only one php-version does funny things why
does anybody start a foolish discussion where the problem is?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
No problem if you tell the other idiots which are thinking
i should read the documentation that the should be quiet
Stop to insult every second person on this list. You are not in the
Bahnhof Cafe here, some respect
Am 13.07.2010 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as
bogus then re-opened and fixed.
I've been wondering for a while now if much of the emotional reaction to bugs
being closed as bogus is due to that very word. I mean, the
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 03:22:30 pm Dirk Haun wrote:
Am 13.07.2010 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as
bogus then re-opened and fixed.
I've been wondering for a while now if much of the emotional reaction to
bugs
On 15 July 2010 04:22, Dirk Haun d...@haun-online.de wrote:
Am 13.07.2010 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as
bogus then re-opened and fixed.
I've been wondering for a while now if much of the emotional reaction to bugs
2010/7/14 Dirk Haun d...@haun-online.de:
Am 13.07.2010 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as
bogus then re-opened and fixed.
I've been wondering for a while now if much of the emotional reaction to bugs
being closed as
