On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Chad Fulton chadful...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
of adding a
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Stanley Sufficool ssuffic...@gmail.comwrote:
After reading a little of this back and forth of annotations,
validation and documentation (oh my). I thought, why not just abstract
the standard types (string, int, bool, etc...) to SPL classes.
This would allow
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:56 -0700, Chad Fulton wrote:
Hello,
Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
of adding a function to the
Hello all.
In trying to follow the annotations threads currently running, I've
come to realise just how little I understand a LOT of what I read
here.
But, then again, I don't need to, so hurrah for me. I try to follow,
but, #fail most of the time.
One thing that did come to mind is if we
hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this something that can just be an extension with its own evolution?
Unless the PHP parser engine can be extended via normal or zend
extensions, no, it can't. And pretty useless to have annotations
outside the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
In trying to follow the annotations threads currently running, I've
come to realise just how little I understand a LOT of what I read
here.
But, then again, I don't need to, so hurrah for me. I try
On 2010-09-16, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:56:04 +0100, Chad Fulton chadful...@gmail.com
wrote:
Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
This RFC does not deal
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that did come to mind is if we ignore all the issues and
complexities of actually implementing annotations, are annotations
hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
weierophin...@php.net wrote:
(I'm still not entirely convinced that the same goals could not be achieved
via
code written on top of a docblock parser extension.)
Look at the xdoclet fiasco, that should finish to convince you that
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:41:33 +0100, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
weierophin...@php.net wrote:
On 2010-09-16, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
Pointless.
Well, this will maybe speedup and standardize the usage of doc comments,
but it's very far from what we could do with real
FWIW, I am in favour of something that allows the parsing of DocBlock comments
(should it just be DocBlock comments though?) and am implementation agnostic so
far (i have too little understanding of where in the core/extensions this would
need to sit).
This would then allow developers to hack
On 17 September 2010 14:17, Rafael Dohms lis...@rafaeldohms.com.br wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10 +0100, Richard Quadling
rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that did come to mind is if we ignore all the
Hi Richard,
Comments inline
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2010 14:17, Rafael Dohms lis...@rafaeldohms.com.br wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:10
Hi!
Unless the PHP parser engine can be extended via normal or zend
extensions, no, it can't. And pretty useless to have annotations
outside the core...
I disagree - it would be very useful *if* we could do that. I.e. if we
could associate data with classes, functions, etc. without actually
Hi!
Look at the xdoclet fiasco, that should finish to convince you that
phpdoc has nothing to do with annotations.
It would be useful if, for those unfamiliar with xdoclet history, you
would explain why it was a fiasco.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM:
On 9/17/10 12:49 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
userspace) 2) adding syntax (probably can't be done in userspace unless
somebody thinks of a clever way to do it).
I've thought of it, and I guess I'll give it a go, I could make this a
proposal if it makes sense to.
The idea is to make the Zend
On Fri Sep 17 01:06 PM, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
Another good example is to map your persistence data into your
Entities. Doctrine 2 implements this and I think that way you can
compare easily with the PHP code alternative. I'd like to ask you to
compate the same Entity mapped through
Inline response:
On 9/17/10 1:57 PM, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
On Fri Sep 17 01:06 PM, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
Another good example is to map your persistence data into your
Entities. Doctrine 2 implements this and I think that way you can
compare easily with the PHP code alternative. I'd
Hello,
I was wondering how early a zend_eval_string call can be made.
Currently it works fine in a PHP_FUNCTION(), but was hoping to put it in
a PHP_MINIT() in hopes of it just executing once.
It seems PHP_MINIT() is too early, and is causing failures. I came
across
19 matches
Mail list logo
