hi,
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
> I'd like to address the most obvious issues I see with moving on to PHP 6.
>
> First, there has already been a lot of discussion on PHP 6 since as
> early as 2007, if I recall correctly. Albeit, a lot of this has died
> down over the ye
Sherif Ramadan wrote:
I propose choosing a different version naming for the next branch.
Perhaps we can skip 6 since it got nowhere and move right to 7. I'm
sure that's superficial right now, but will be important for the sake
of not confusing anyone that may have read or heard about what PHP 6
w
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Stas,
>
>> I like this idea. array_first_key would be nice too
>>
>> I am probably missing something, but what those would allow to do that
>> rewind/end+key() doesn't do?
>>
>
> The big thing that it does that end()+key() doesn't do is rea
+1 :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Craig [mailto:kris.cr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:47 AM
> To: Anthony Ferrara
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 6.0 And Moving Forward
>
> >
> >
> > 4. Rewrite the entire parser completely. I keep hearing abou
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Paul Dragoonis wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Anthony Ferrara
> wrote:
> > Stas,
> >
> >> I like this idea. array_first_key would be nice too
> >>
> >> I am probably missing something, but what those would allow to do that
> >> rewind/end+key() doesn't
(forgot to CC internals on the previous email)
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, John LeSueur wrote:
> Readability is solved by creating a userland function:
>
> function array_last_key(&$array)
> {
> return key(array_slice($array, -1,1,true));
> }
Another userland function, with a by-ref par
Em Sat, 14 Jul 2012 04:04:27 +0200, Anthony Ferrara
escreveu:
I like this idea. array_first_key would be nice too
I am probably missing something, but what those would allow to do that
rewind/end+key() doesn't do?
The big thing that it does that end()+key() doesn't do is really what it
do
Gustavo,
Why is the last key special? Why not a function to get the first or the
> penultimate key?
>
How would such a function look?
> Of course, there is one aspect where the first and last keys are special
> -- if you have some algorithm where you pop or shift the array
> successively. But i
On 07/14/2012 10:13 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Gustavo,
>
> Why is the last key special? Why not a function to get the first or the
>> penultimate key?
>>
>
> How would such a function look?
I think the function would look just like the function we have for doing
this.
key(array_slice($arr,-2
Em Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:13:32 +0200, Anthony Ferrara
escreveu:
Why is the last key special? Why not a function to get the first or the
penultimate key?
How would such a function look?
I think you've misread my statement. I was not suggesting a function that
would get an arbitrary key.
On 07/14/2012 10:29 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 07/14/2012 10:13 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>> Gustavo,
>>
>> Why is the last key special? Why not a function to get the first or the
>>> penultimate key?
>>>
>>
>> How would such a function look?
>
> I think the function would look just like the
Hi there,
This is a patch that replaces PHP's infamous logo GUIDs with data URIs
instead, and also embed PHP credits in the phpinfo() page, hidden
using JavaScript (but gracefully degrading), to eliminate these GUIDs
altogether.
:)
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/132
--
Andrew Faulds (AJF)
Hi,
I'm calling the function php_pcre_replace() in my extension:
http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_5_4/ext/pcre/php_pcre.c#952
I would like to use a callback for the replace_val, but this will be
supplied by my extension. I'm wondering what the recommended way of
creating the replace_val zval callback
On 07/14/2012 01:49 PM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is a patch that replaces PHP's infamous logo GUIDs with data URIs
> instead, and also embed PHP credits in the phpinfo() page, hidden
> using JavaScript (but gracefully degrading), to eliminate these GUIDs
> altogether.
>
> :)
>
>
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is a patch that replaces PHP's infamous logo GUIDs with data URIs
> instead, and also embed PHP credits in the phpinfo() page, hidden
> using JavaScript (but gracefully degrading), to eliminate these GUIDs
> altogether.
>
>
FYI, data URIs are only supported in IE8 or higher, IE7 and below do not
support them.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 07/14/2012 01:49 PM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > This is a patch that replaces PHP's infamous logo GUIDs with data URIs
> > instead, a
Hi!
> And I actually know of websites using the functions to display the logo..
> Is there some way we could provide a BC function for it somehow?
> Maybe rather then removing the functions, make then return the data uris?
Having the functions to get the images sounds like a good idea, some
sites
Hi!
Could anybody tell me what defaulthost parameter is supposed to do in
imap_headerinfo()? The docs say nothing about it and it doesn't seem to
be used anywhere in the code. Any ideas? Should we just remove it or it
serves some purpose?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http:/
I can't seem to get a vanilla php binary from a simple
$ ./configure
make
make install
The last few lines indicate that everything went well:
Installing PHP SAPI module: cgi
Installing PHP CGI binary: /usr/local/bin/
*Installing PHP CLI binary:/usr/local/bin/*
Installing PHP CLI ma
On 2012-07-14 04:12, jpauli wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
4. Rewrite the entire parser completely. I keep hearing about how bad PHP's
parser is, and how it's growing out of control. Perhaps this is a good time
to rewrite it (perhaps changing semantics slightly)
Hi!
When I go to qa.php.net to see pulls for php-src, I only see pulls down
to number 56, but earlier ones are not displayed for some reason. Does
anybody know what's wrong with it and could fix it?
Thanks,
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-690
Hi!
We've got a bit of a discussion on bug #49510 in the comments. The
problem is this: filter_var('', FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN, array("flags"
=> FILTER_NULL_ON_FAILURE)) returns "null" (i.e. failure) while docs say
boolean filter will return false on ''. I think we need to sync with the
docs.
The
22 matches
Mail list logo
