On Di., 5. Sep. 2017, 21:32 Andreas Heigl wrote:
> Hey Richard
>
> Am 05.09.17 um 19:29 schrieb Fleshgrinder:
> > On 9/5/2017 7:01 PM, Andreas Heigl wrote:
> >> Hey Richard, Hey all.
> >>
> >> Thanks for putting up the RFC and the implementation!
> >>
> >> Having UUIDs in the core would be awesom
On 05/09/17 21:45, Rowan Collins wrote:
>> I've been pushing the idea of a single method of managing metadata for
>> a long time.
>> A single standard set of rules
>> that can be used across the board from variable creation to checking
>> data going out to forms and returns coming back and data be
Granted, sorry about delay.
Cheers
Joe
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:10 AM, BohwaZ/PHP wrote:
> Hello, anyone? :)
>
>
> Kia ora,
>>
>> I'm requesting access to wiki to be able to write the RFC on
>> implementing missing pdo_sqlite features, following pull request
>> https://github.com/php/php-src/pu
Granted, sorry about delay.
Cheers
Joe
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Treichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I registered my wiki account "Blar" and need some karma for my first RFC
> for new cookie functions. I already posted some infos about
> "http_cookie_set and http_cookie_remove" on the mail
On 6 September 2017 at 02:15, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> What should we do for this?
Not us, you.
You should start listening to other people's feedback.
You continually refuse to accept any feedback that doesn't agree with
your world-view, not only on the subject of hkdf, but on validation
and other
On 5 September 2017 at 18:24, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> Maybe I should stop the vote. The discussion is happening now instead of
> before when I asked for it. We'll have to wait for at least six months
> for another vote if this is a no, due to the rules.
That would be fine and appropriate. The RFC t
On 6 September 2017 09:29:37 BST, Lester Caine wrote:
>My only problem with Yasuo's latest offering is once again it adds a
>whole new set of defines that have to be mapped to existing metadata
>definitions ... That and it is a lot of longhand code using a different
>style to existing arrays. We n
On 6 September 2017 at 12:15, Rowan Collins wrote:
> If you have suggestions for how the format should look
Don't use a format. Just write code - see below.
> Which is why Yasuo and I have both suggested we work together
If you're going to work together and continue the conversation, please
ca
I'd seriously start considering to start doing PHP code for things like
these, so they are not bogged down by the fact that they are in C and there
is 0.5 devs interested in supporting it.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, 14:09 Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 18:24, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> > Maybe
On 06/09/17 12:15, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 09:29:37 BST, Lester Caine wrote:
>> My only problem with Yasuo's latest offering is once again it adds a
>> whole new set of defines that have to be mapped to existing metadata
>> definitions ... That and it is a lot of longhand code u
Am 06.09.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Lester Caine:
The likes of ADOdb datadict are still used as a base for metadata in
projects, but PDO destroyed the standardisation that used to exist by
spawning a number of competing wrappers. https://github.com/ADOdb/ADOdb
has evolved from a private project to b
> On 6 Sep 2017, at 18:15, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
>> On 6 September 2017 09:29:37 BST, Lester Caine wrote:
>> My only problem with Yasuo's latest offering is once again it adds a
>> whole new set of defines that have to be mapped to existing metadata
>> definitions ... That and it is a lot of l
On 06/09/17 13:00, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 06.09.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Lester Caine:
>> The likes of ADOdb datadict are still used as a base for metadata in
>> projects, but PDO destroyed the standardisation that used to exist by
>> spawning a number of competing wrappers. https://github.com/A
On 6 September 2017 12:38:03 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>On 6 September 2017 at 12:15, Rowan Collins
>wrote:
>
>> If you have suggestions for how the format should look
>
>Don't use a format. Just write code - see below.
I'm going to assume that the code you posted was something of a straw man, and
On 6 September 2017 12:52:24 BST, Lester Caine wrote:
>On 06/09/17 12:15, Rowan Collins wrote:
>> On 6 September 2017 09:29:37 BST, Lester Caine
>wrote:
>> Which is why Yasuo and I have both suggested we work together to come
>up with such a standard format that can be used or adapted for these
>
I think that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just because of the
supportability – but also because of security. A whole class of security
exploits – buffer/stack overflows, underruns and all sorts of memory
mismanagement become irrelevant when the code is implemented in PHP. I brought
Le 06/09/2017 à 14:46, Zeev Suraski a écrit :
> We could create a mechanism where the contents of certain .php files is
> embedded into the binary, compiled during MINIT, and made available pretty at
> the same ‘builtinness’ level as C extensions.
Just for memory, an implementation already exi
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I think that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just because of the
> supportability – but also because of security. A whole class of security
> exploits – buffer/stack overflows, underruns and all sorts of memory
> mismanagement become i
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > I think that actually makes a lot of sense, and not just because of the
> > supportability – but also because of security. A whole class of security
> > exploits – buffer/stack overfl
On 06/09/17 13:46, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> We’d probably have to be pretty selective in terms of what goes in there –
> probably just as selective as we are with the C-based extensions, but I’d
> imagine that things like ext/exif, UUID, and perhaps even things like
> unserialize() could find thems
Hi Zeev,
Le 06/09/2017 à 16:01, Zeev Suraski a écrit :
Thanks for the pointer! I didn't pay close attention to that discussion
back then. I do remember François brought it up in a discussion back in
2015 in Paris.
For me the issue of security is a major benefit that I don't think was
brought u
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:30 AM, François Laupretre
wrote:
>> Secondly, ideally, this shouldn't just be a mechanism to mix and match C
>> and PHP - but actually make it easy for people to write pure PHP code
>> that'll become integrated to the PHP binary. PCS can practically already
>> support th
Hi!
> That would be fine and appropriate. The RFC targets 7.3. Having a
> discussion and vote in March gives plenty of time for getting it into
> 7.3
>
> Cancelling a vote just to avoid an RFC being rejected is (imo) playing
> slightly fast and loose with the rules.
I agree. I think the RFC itse
On 6 September 2017 at 13:31, Rowan Collins wrote:
> I'm going to assume that the code you posted was something of a straw
> man, and you're not actually advocating people copy 20 lines of code for
> every variable they want to validate.
You assume wrong. No it's not, and yes I am.
I can point a
On 6 September 2017 21:33:53 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>On 6 September 2017 at 13:31, Rowan Collins
>wrote:
>> I'm going to assume that the code you posted was something of a straw
>> man, and you're not actually advocating people copy 20 lines of code
>for
>> every variable they want to validate.
Results for project PHP master, build date 2017-09-05 19:23:47-07:00
commit: dfe0300
previous commit:002856c
revision date: 2017-09-05 18:14:21+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
Hi everyone,
This is the tiniest of issues, but it's bugged me for a long time and
makes the HTML produced by PHP code less readable than it out to be.
Specifically, PHP ignores a newline immediately following a ?> tag. The
reason for this is, from what I recall, to prevent issues where
white
Hi Dan
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 12:15, Rowan Collins
> wrote:
>
> > If you have suggestions for how the format should look
>
> Don't use a format. Just write code - see below.
>
> > Which is why Yasuo and I have both suggested we work together
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 18:45, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Would anyone object to me changing how PHP handles this so that only the
> final ?> tag consumes its following newline, and only at the end of the file?
>
I object. It's a change in ancient behavior that has the potential to break
existing c
Hi Dan,
I appreciate your feedback, regardless of your opinion towards this issue.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 02:15, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > What should we do for this?
>
> Not us, you.
>
OK. It is recorded that you think current API is totally
Hi Dan,
Sorry for keep posting broken English.
I shouldn't difficult.
>
It shouldn't be difficult.
Looking forward more than handful, useful and common hash_hkdf()
application
examples for PHP that justify the API. If you would not like to spend time
for working
code, just ideas are OK also.
R
31 matches
Mail list logo
