Not trying to rush anyone to something they have no energy working on
anymore here but what's the plan here then? And what plan is there
with these short tags on the long run?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 5/11/2019 9:51 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
https://pecl.php.net/package/sync/1.1.1/windows
The DLLs were not built for 7.3 when 7.3 was released. I could probably get it
to happen by doing a package release but, if no actual code changes are
needed, creating a new package that says "Bumping ver
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Hruska
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2019 2:57 PM
> To: Anatol Belski ; PHP Development
>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Trigger rebuild of DLLs for PECL extensions?
>
> On 5/11/2019 4:58 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >
On 5/11/2019 4:58 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hruska
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2019 1:39 PM
To: PHP Development
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Trigger rebuild of DLLs for PECL extensions?
Is there a way to trigger the Windows DLL build process for a PECL extension
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Hruska
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2019 1:39 PM
> To: PHP Development
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Trigger rebuild of DLLs for PECL extensions?
>
> Is there a way to trigger the Windows DLL build process for a PECL extension
> without publishing a new relea
Is there a way to trigger the Windows DLL build process for a PECL
extension without publishing a new release?
--
Thomas Hruska
CubicleSoft President
I've got great, time saving software that you will find useful.
http://cubiclesoft.com/
And once you find my software useful:
http://cubicleso
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:56 AM Niklas Keller wrote:
> > I'm against deprecating it or removing it.
> >
> > As said earlier, it has some security value, especially with mass
> > hosting. If I'm hosting thousands of websites for thousands of users,
> > using chroot is not doable, and open_basedir
On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 06:12, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019, 2:06 PM Peter Kokot wrote:
>
> >
> > The images for such C software are one of the more useless ones. Snaps
> > or custom Linux repositories are the way to go here. Because of the
> > installation time. Building several ex
On 11/05/2019 08:53, Niklas Keller wrote:
That's exactly the reason why I'm for removing it. There will always
be ways to circumvent open_basedir and setups like this are insecure.
It gives a false sense of security. It's not better than nothing,
because most hosting providers would opt for a rea
> > That's exactly the reason why I'm for removing it. There will always
> > be ways to circumvent open_basedir and setups like this are insecure.
> > It gives a false sense of security. It's not better than nothing,
> > because most hosting providers would opt for a real solution instead
> > of le
10 matches
Mail list logo
