On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:10 AM Theodore Brown wrote:
> > As requested at the end of April, [1] Bishop and I are resurrecting
> > the Numeric Literal Separator RFC:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/numeric_literal_separator.
> >
> > If no serious issues come up, voting will start in two weeks
> > (on
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 12:35, G. P. B. wrote:
>
> Also I think those kind of magic numbers should be constants with
> meaningful names, and it that case you could just compute them by adding
> powers of ten.
> E.g. DISCOUNT_IN_CENTS = 1 * 10^5 + 3 * 10^4 + 5 * 10^3;
I agree naming things is impor
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:03 AM Côme Chilliet wrote:
> > My understanding from the RFC is that that the grouping is not
> > relevant, the `_` is stripped regardless.
> >
> > Am I wrong?
>
> No you’re not, the RFC allows grouping as the coder wants.
>
> Which is why I think it may cause problems b
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:34 AM G. P. B. wrote:
> I share the same concerns as Rowan Collins
>From my reading of Rowan's email, he was making a general point that
new features can have a cost of added complexity for users. He then
clarified "I don't personally think that applies here".
> I'm re
Le mercredi 29 mai 2019, 10:39:17 CEST Markus Fischer a écrit :
> My understanding from the RFC is that that the grouping is not relevant,
> the `_` is stripped regardless.
>
> Am I wrong?
No you’re not, the RFC allows grouping as the coder wants.
Which is why I think it may cause problems beca
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 2:49 AM Côme Chilliet wrote:
> What bugs me with this RFC is that it seems to be mainly intended
> for grouping digits by 3, which from what I understand is cultural.
While it is expected that grouping decimal literals by 3 will be a
frequent use case, the RFC does not en
I share the same concerns as Rowan Collins, and I'm really not a fan of the
RFC in general.
Also I think those kind of magic numbers should be constants with
meaningful names, and it that case you could just compute them by adding
powers of ten.
E.g. DISCOUNT_IN_CENTS = 1 * 10^5 + 3 * 10^4 + 5 * 10
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:40 PM Markus Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29.05.19 09:49, Côme Chilliet wrote:
> > What bugs me with this RFC is that it seems to be mainly intended for
> grouping digits by 3, which from what I understand is cultural.
> > At least some asian languages have a concept of
>
Hi,
On 29.05.19 09:49, Côme Chilliet wrote:
What bugs me with this RFC is that it seems to be mainly intended for grouping
digits by 3, which from what I understand is cultural.
At least some asian languages have a concept of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriad and group them by 4, at least f
On 29.05.2019 at 09:49, Côme Chilliet wrote:
> What bugs me with this RFC is that it seems to be mainly intended for
> grouping digits by 3, which from what I understand is cultural.
> At least some asian languages have a concept of
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriad and group them by 4, at
What bugs me with this RFC is that it seems to be mainly intended for grouping
digits by 3, which from what I understand is cultural.
At least some asian languages have a concept of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriad and group them by 4, at least from the
language point of view.
It does seem w
11 matches
Mail list logo
