[PHP-DEV] SensitiveParameterValue serialization behavior

2022-02-24 Thread Tim Düsterhus , WoltLab GmbH
Hi Internals! during code review of the "Redacting parameters in back traces" RFC [1] an issue with the proposed serialization behavior of SensitiveParameterValue objects became apparent that was not noticed before the RFC went into voting: The RFC proposed that serialization was allowed, bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 4.0

2022-02-24 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Hi On 2/24/22 09:47, Go Kudo wrote: RFC has been updated. Is this up to the required standard? https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension I've just passed my own RFC just yesterday, so I'm certainly not an expert with regard to RFC standards, however: I think the explanation in the RFC is *much

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 4.0

2022-02-24 Thread Mel Dafert
On 24 February 2022 09:47:39 CET, Go Kudo wrote: > >Hi > >RFC has been updated. Is this up to the required standard? >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > >I acknowledge that the previous RFC may have been difficult to discuss. If >the problem has been solved, I would like to make another ML-w

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Undefined Variable Error Promotion

2022-02-24 Thread Rowan Tommins
On 23/02/2022 23:03, Mark Randall wrote: On 23/02/2022 19:32, Rowan Tommins wrote I think that wording change should be part of the proposed change in the RFC. Otherwise, a lot of people simply won't know the decision to remove it has been made and will be surprised when 9.0 comes around. It

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 4.0

2022-02-24 Thread Go Kudo
2022年2月21日(月) 21:44 Tim Düsterhus : > Hi > > On 2/21/22 03:57, Go Kudo wrote: > > I am sorry for the delay in replying. > > Don't worry, there was a weekend inbetween and I totally understand that > one wants to take their weekend off. > > > Thank you for the clear explanation. > > It is true th