> [1] In fact if the right hand side of with may be an expression that
> evaluates to an array, folks wouldn't need to learn new syntax at all:
>
> $newProperties = [ "foo" => "bar" ];
> clone $object with $newProperties;
>
> and
>
> clone $object with [ "foo" => "bar" ];
in my
> I think it would be more intuitive to implement an array "appending"
> functionality with "concatenating" syntax. The `.=` syntax already
exists,
> but is forbidden from use on non-strings. If you want to implement this
> preexisting syntax as an array concatenation operator, then it is a
i can't prove that i was shadowbanned but after a huge fight with someone
on this mailing list, i stopped getting all responses from it, even just
general help commands, for about 6 years. mysteriously it just started
working again last year with nothing done on my part, and here i am, right
where
> Currently there are people with voting permissions that do vote, yet do
not
interact with RFCs or the mailing list.
it does not help that depending on how you get the mailing list (like me,
in digest form) its almost impossible to actually chime in. just to reply
to this i have done about 13
why stop with clamp? add wrap too. imagine being against clamp but ok with
floor and ceiling. lets make our math lib even better.
> - Do you think that PHP needs an object-scoped random number
> > implementation? And why?
if this means each object can maintain its own seed i dont know why php or
many other languages dont have this truely. been doing game dev recently
and i needed an rng system that does not involve messing
