On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:35 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 01:05 PM, Kevin Gessner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Kevin Gessner
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello internals team! I'd like to propose an RFC to allow traits to
> > > implement interfaces.
> > >
> >
> > I'v
I agree. with Sebastian. I'm personally a big fan of using traits as the
implementation mechanism for interfaces (i.e. implement the interfaces
methods in a trait, then use that trait in a class that implements the
interface), but I don't think there is anything positive to gain from
having the tra
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM John Bafford wrote:
> Chase,
>
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 13:15, Chase Peeler wrote:
> >
> > 1.) I think everyone already knows how to be an adult. The fact that
> > sometimes we don't act in a civil manner isn't because we don
ul to Anthony and Derick for carrying this RFC.
>
> Now… I have one issue with this argument :
>
> Chase Peeler a écrit le 22/01/2016 19:15 :
> > 3.) Finally, I think a Code of Conduct that includes punitive
> > measures is a bad idea. I won't go into details on why,
I just want to reiterate what I've said a few times before. I'm leaving the
points about why I think a Code of Conduct, in general, is a bad idea until
the end, in hopes that others will at least read my other points. I don't
think there is anything "new" in what I'm saying below either - I'm prett
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:46 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On 1/13/16 1:18 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> > On 1/12/16 5:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >
> >> But we can not change the conduct of "whole of internals as a group".
> >
> > Yes we can!
> >
> > Let's say *we* would improve our conduct. I m
I personally offered at least two emails with constructive feedback and
alternative solutions. I never saw any reply or feedback to either one. I
also had some emails in which I was somewhat argumentative (the ones
related to the definition of harassment). I still stand by those emails as
they were
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2016 8:47 PM, "Brandon Savage"
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > At the same time, though, if someone is being maliciously hostile what
> > > great cover! A private email is not a PHP-Group managed resource, so
> no
> > > rules! Twitter,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM Paul M. Jones wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >
> > Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can trust
> to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but that are
> fair) that don't fall too far
Let's look at this from the perspective of a conflict mediation standpoint
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:55 AM Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Keith,
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:38 AM, D Keith Casey
> wrote:
> > On 1/7/16 11:52 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01/07/2016 10:08 PM, Brian Moon wrote
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:49 AM Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 8, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Anthony Ferrara
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Simply look at the level of attacks that me and a few other committers
> >> have received by m
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2016 2:58 AM, "Chase Peeler" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Pierre Joye
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jan 8, 2016 2:44 AM, "Paul M. Jones&quo
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2016 3:34 AM, "Chase Peeler" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Pierre Joye
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 8, 2016 3:14 AM, "Chas
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2016 3:14 AM, "Chase Peeler" wrote:
>
> >
> > And none of those caveats exist in the definition you provided.
>
> Hmmm. Which one did you read?
>
> "the act of systematic and/or
The way I see this, and I believe others do as well based on the previous
recommendation to split this into two RFCs, is there are two goals:
1.) Making it clear that the community welcomes all individuals
2.) A means for handling conflict resolution.
To me, #1 doesn't really fall into a "Code of
While overall I tend to agree with Paul on the concept of a CoC, I don't
think that precludes the ability to offer suggestions. It's to everyone's
advantage to make sure that if we do adopt a CoC, we adopt the best one
possible.
Obviously one of the biggest fears is unjust treatment of the accused
201 - 216 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
