Op ma 15 mei 2023 om 20:06 schreef Rowan Tommins :
>
> On 15 May 2023 14:07:31 BST, Lydia de Jongh wrote:
> >> ...
> >> #[SomeAttribute(callback: nameof(\Acme\bar(...))]
> >> ...
> >
> >This callback to nameof(). is really terrible 😣😣
>
>
(I hope it is ok that I take parts from several mails)
Op za 13 mei 2023 om 12:37 schreef Rowan Tommins :
> On 13 May 2023 10:04:39 BST, Lydia de Jongh wrote:
>
> >I prefer a magic constant like `::name` instead of a function call as it
> >can be used in a wider scope; for exam
Wow! Yess please. My mail yesterday crossed yours, I guess (thanks Claude
for answering)
asking for almost the same:
myClass::$normalProperty::name
So I would like to add my thoughts to your proposal.
I prefer a magic constant like `::name` instead of a function call as it
can be used in a wider
Hi,
Lately I made a small object initializer/builder with php Attributes.
'Directly' accessing properties and methods of the class as a parameter in
an Attribute is not really possible.
You can do that for a class with: \path\to\MyClass::class, but for
properties or methods you have to use string
Hi,
Interesting discussion
I do prefer a good organised forum above a mailinglist:
- better overview
- better searchable
- quicker to read
- less mail
- possibility to give likes
As a newcomer here, it is hard to find previous information. Even on
externals.io.
That signing on to the mailin
Hi Derick, Thomas,
Op do 16 feb. 2023 om 08:57 schreef Derick Rethans :
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/unicode_text_processing
>
> And yes, that won't be as fast as just calling strtoupper.
>
> cheers
> Derick
>
Looks great!!!
Complex string manipulation inside an object will be faster then al
Hi,
Very interesting topic! On which I have NO experience 🙈
Op wo 15 feb. 2023 om 08:02 schreef Rowan Tommins :
> On 15 February 2023 05:18:50 GMT, Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
> >My instinct was that it could just be a built-in class, with an internal
> pointer to a zend_string that's completely in
Hi,
Thanks for all the answers so far.
On 2/8/23 17:04, naitsi...@e.mail.de wrote:
> > Would it make sense to make "null" the default value for nullable
properties at least?
> > So that one could write
> >
> > class Test {
> > public ?string $name;
> > }
> >
> > var_dump((new Test())
Hi Kamil,
Thanks for your reply.
With regards to the automatic default, of course I can only agree!
Indeed isset() should not be needed for declared properties!
But because of the typed properties, you have to initialize them before you
can access them. I think that is cluttering up the code.
>F
ults to []
protected ?string $optionalVar; // defaults to null
protected string $table = 'category';
protected !bool $isOk; // defaults to false
protected !float $someNumber; // default to 0
protected ?myObject $oObject; // no default for objects... to
complicated and risky
10 matches
Mail list logo
