On 03/20/2013 11:43 AM, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
Like Mike emaild me, i can just change my code to something like
$obj->getImage()->getUrl(), where getImage() will return a mock object
with getUrl() returning an empty string.
But my request here is not about this case only.
Imagine you have a web
On 01/14/2013 10:12 PM, Herman Radtke wrote:
If it is called "array_pluck" it should remove the data in question from the
original array. (I'm not saying that is a desirable feature here, I'm just
saying that makes more sense based on the meaning of the name you seem to
prefer.)
Why do you think
On 01/14/2013 02:19 PM, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Ben,
Am 14.01.2013 um 23:16 schrieb Pierre Joye :
[...]
Up to you, but I'd to suggest again to re do the vote and add the
naming option, easy, clear, open.
I was one of the people changing from yes to no because of the name. I like the
functional
Hi,
On 01/12/2013 07:34 AM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
2) Developers coming from other languages (Ruby, JavaScript, etc.)
will instantly recognize array_pluck(). It's what they'll be looking
for to do the same thing, but they won't be looking for array_column().
-Ben
When I have to write JavaScri
On 01/11/2013 04:17 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
I've opened voting for the array_column() function RFC.
You can vote at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_column#voting
Regards,
Ben
+1
I can't vote, but I support this RFC.
This is much, much simpler to use and easier to implement than most
other th
On 04/13/2012 09:12 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 04/13/2012 09:09 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
However I think it would make sense not to use this conversion in string
comparisons when we know it's lossy - it seems to be outside of the use
case for such comparisons and it seems apparent by now that
class_implements() this is what I thought it did before reading the
docs)
-matt
On Jun 30, 2011 12:46 AM, "David Muir" wrote:
> On 30/06/11 11:13, Matt Pelmear wrote:
>> Seems odd to me that is_subclass_of returns true for interfaces... I
never
>> realized that before.
>&g
Seems odd to me that is_subclass_of returns true for interfaces... I never
realized that before.
Personally I would prefer a separate method to check for interfaces, since
they aren't really classes (at least in my head), but I suppose that would
break BC. (I've always wanted a method for checking
Hello,
I discovered today that the DOMNode::getAttribute() function (which is
undocumented on the php site) returns an empty string if the requested
attribute doesn't exist in the node.
>From the source:
if (value == NULL) {
RETURN_EMPTY_STRING();
} else {
I'm sure this has probably been covered here in the past, but I've
been unable to find a good way to search for it, so I'll just ask.
if( '2011020402421730' === '20110204024217300264' )
echo 'BAD';
else
echo 'GOOD';
results in "GOOD" being echoed.
However,
if( '2011020402421730' == '
Hello all,
First post here; been watching for a while though.
IMHO:
1) Implicit isset() checks in ?: would be bad. This would not
"silently improve not-so-well written code"; In fact it would make
not-so-well written code more difficult to debug. I can't count the
number of times I've run across c
11 matches
Mail list logo
