Hello Marcus,
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 01:16:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 11:23:47 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
That's done, for 5_3 [1] and HEAD [2].
And a test [3][4] covering mostly all the cases.
Hello Arnaud,
Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:36:53 AM, you wrote:
Hello Marcus,
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 01:16:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 11:23:47 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
That's done, for 5_3 [1]
Hello,
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
That's done, for 5_3 [1] and HEAD [2].
And a test [3][4] covering mostly all the cases.
[1] http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/MultipleIterator_5_3.patch
[2] http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/MultipleIterator_HEAD.patch
[3]
Hello Arnaud,
Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 11:23:47 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
That's done, for 5_3 [1] and HEAD [2].
And a test [3][4] covering mostly all the cases.
[1] http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/MultipleIterator_5_3.patch
[2]
Hello Arnaud,
Thursday, July 10, 2008, 2:16:33 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:06:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
if you can provicde the same for HEAD then I'll submit it. And if you're
fast enough we might even get it into 5.3.0 :-) Johannes, Lukas, how
Hello
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
If you do intend to do it, (or if you don't), please let us know so we
can prioritize things, and eventually focus on other things, before
the 24th.
Thanks in
Hello,
Slightly modified and applied. Thanks for the good work.
Thanks :)
Care to look into the MultipleIterator next?
Ok, I will do that.
Etienne, I think I can do that before the 24th.
Regards,
Arnaud
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hello Arnaud,
I will commit it afte I have reviewed and changed it a bit. Right now you
ignore conversoin errors. I'll change this to throw exceptions to be inline
with other code. However I am in Tel Aviv right now for a company work
meeting, so I have little time this week.
marcus
Hello,
Ok, that's why I said that I didn't know what to do with these conversions. At
now I just left the E_NOTICE errors.
Regards
Hello Arnaud,
I will commit it afte I have reviewed and changed it a bit. Right now you
ignore conversoin errors. I'll change this to throw exceptions to be
On 16.07.2008, at 17:47, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:06:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
if you can provicde the same for HEAD then I'll submit it. And if
you're
fast enough we might even get it into 5.3.0 :-) Johannes, Lukas, how
much time does he have?
Hello,
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:06:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
if you can provicde the same for HEAD then I'll submit it. And if you're
fast enough we might even get it into 5.3.0 :-) Johannes, Lukas, how
much time does he have?
marcus
Ok, I made it [1]. I never
Hello Arnaud,
Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 3:49:36 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
I have seen a NEEDS DEVELOPER flag on the TODO for the Implement
RecursiveTreeIterator in C task, so I would like to propose my
implementation [1].
Currently it follows the PHP implementation, except that it does not have a
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks very good! Many thanks.
Best regards,
Marcus
Thanks :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Arnaud,
if you can provicde the same for HEAD then I'll submit it. And if you're
fast enough we might even get it into 5.3.0 :-) Johannes, Lukas, how
much time does he have?
marcus
Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 4:16:20 PM, you wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Marcus Boerger
Hi,
I have seen a NEEDS DEVELOPER flag on the TODO for the Implement
RecursiveTreeIterator in C task, so I would like to propose my
implementation [1].
Currently it follows the PHP implementation, except that it does not have a
$prefix public property (how about a private property and a
15 matches
Mail list logo
