Hi again,
ok, I just verified that the current PHP 5.3 CVS has the same behaviour
as PHP 5.3 alpha 3 (which is the original design). So basically, I'd
suggest the following:
* Feature freeze as Lukas and Johannes had planned tomorrow with *no*
more changes wrt. closures for beta1, then
hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Christian Seiler chris...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi again,
ok, I just verified that the current PHP 5.3 CVS has the same behaviour
as PHP 5.3 alpha 3 (which is the original design). So basically, I'd
suggest the following:
* Feature freeze as Lukas and
On 22.01.2009, at 20:39, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Christian Seiler chris...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hi again,
ok, I just verified that the current PHP 5.3 CVS has the same
behaviour
as PHP 5.3 alpha 3 (which is the original design). So basically, I'd
suggest the
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
On 22.01.2009, at 20:39, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Christian Seiler chris...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hi again,
ok, I just verified that the current PHP 5.3 CVS has the same behaviour
as
Hi!
I'm talking about the features we already have, not about adding more
major features. If one of the new features is not complete and we know
it, why do you want to go ahead then? I can't find any good reason.
You can argue every feature is not complete because there's always
something
On 22.01.2009, at 21:08, Pierre Joye wrote:
I'm talking about the features we already have, not about adding more
major features. If one of the new features is not complete and we know
it, why do you want to go ahead then? I can't find any good reason.
because it means all the other features
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
On 22.01.2009, at 21:08, Pierre Joye wrote:
I'm talking about the features we already have, not about adding more
major features. If one of the new features is not complete and we know
it, why do you want to go
On Thursday 22 January 2009 8:21:28 am Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi everybody,
We had that chat that Lukas announced yesterday and I promised Lukas to
sum up the results of that chat.
Problem was: There were only four people really there: Stas, Lukas,
David and me. Lukas was interested in
